Re: [MonoTouch] Web Services Performance for Point of Sales application.

2013-08-27 Thread Nic Wise
The overhead of using Json over HTTP vrs pretty much anything else (binary over sockets etc) is going to be negated by the speed of the internet - or lack of it. The round trip from your POS to the server is going to be 1ms on a local network, and possibly 10-100ms (or more if it's 3G/4G - 2-5s

Re: [MonoTouch] Web-services vs other + BTFON

2011-11-08 Thread Nic Wise
it infrequently. D -Original Message- From: monotouch-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:monotouch-boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of simarx Sent: 07 November 2011 13:11 To: monotouch@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [MonoTouch] Web-services vs other + BTFON Another Question

Re: [MonoTouch] Web-services vs other?

2011-11-07 Thread Brian Newton
I can say that I've been using a web service backend for most of the processing in my app, have made probably close to 100-200 calls while developing it and I've never had it timeout. Are you thinking the unreliability is innate to web services or just the way Monotouch handles them? On Thu, Oct

Re: [MonoTouch] Web-services vs other?

2011-11-07 Thread David Black
From: monotouch-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:monotouch-boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Brian Newton Sent: 07 November 2011 08:28 To: simarx Cc: monotouch@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [MonoTouch] Web-services vs other? I can say that I've been using a web service backend for most

Re: [MonoTouch] Web-services vs other?

2011-11-07 Thread simarx
We have our own web-services on our own servers and use them all the time for all sorts of purposes and don't experience problems in using them so I know they're running fine. From the iPhone I was regularly getting timeouts getting a connection. So steps I took to progress... 1. Using the

Re: [MonoTouch] Web-services vs other + BTFON

2011-11-07 Thread David Black
a small amount of data and do it infrequently. D   -Original Message- From: monotouch-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:monotouch-boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of simarx Sent: 07 November 2011 13:11 To: monotouch@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [MonoTouch] Web-services vs other + BTFON

Re: [MonoTouch] web-services vs alternative

2011-10-28 Thread AnthonyLambert
I personally like ProtocolBuffers see : http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-net/ http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-net/ From their website: /protocol buffers is the name of the binary serialization format used by Google for much of their data communications. It is designed to be: small in

Re: [MonoTouch] web-services vs alternative

2011-10-28 Thread AnthonyLambert
Actually there are two mature implementations for c#. This is the one I personally prefer as its a little more light weight http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/ http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/ Have fun! Tony -- View this message in context:

Re: [MonoTouch] Web Services

2011-08-24 Thread Dean Harry
? Thanks! Dean From: Demis Bellot [mailto:demis.bel...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 23 August 2011 12:03 AM To: Dean Harry Cc: monotouch@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [MonoTouch] Web Services Hey Dean, Apart from the technical limitations, coupling your web services with your RDBMS is generally

Re: [MonoTouch] Web Services

2011-08-24 Thread Demis Bellot
if it works? Or tell me what I am missing / doing wrong? Thanks! Dean From: Demis Bellot [mailto:demis.bel...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 23 August 2011 12:03 AM To: Dean Harry Cc: monotouch@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [MonoTouch] Web Services Hey Dean, Apart from the technical