33.613.451.355
>
> http://www.dominiquebesson.com
> http://www.mondographics.net
> http://www.affichesdecinema.com
> http://www.chagall-posters.net
>
>
> *From:* Info Movie Poster Art Gallery
> *Sent:* Friday, May 12, 2017 12:40 PM
> *To:* MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: [M
net/>
>
>
> From: Info Movie Poster Art Gallery <>
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:40 PM
> To: <>MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU <mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Help please with LOLITA French 1p
>
> “I thought the repros were not
browning.
>
> As you pointed out correctly, 1960 is different.
>
> Helmut
>
>
>> Am 11.05.2017 um 19:42 schrieb Info Movie Poster Art Gallery
>> <i...@mpag.co.uk>:
>>
>> Re: [MOPO] Help please with LOLITA French 1p
>>
>> The repros wer
d have it linenbacked ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> the paper and ink used back then is quite typical so you should be able
>>>>> to determine whether its original or an 80s reprint whether it's
>>>>> linenbacked or
please with LOLITA French 1p
“I thought the repros were not litho printed? “
I’m sure they were, hence all the problems, finding their way into Christies
etc..
On 11/05/2017 20:57, "MPB Warehouse" <wlmailhtml:wareho...@comic-art.com> wrote:
At 12:12 PM 5/11/2017, Richa
³I thought the repros were not litho printed? ³
I¹m sure they were, hence all the problems, finding their way into Christies
etc..
On 11/05/2017 20:57, "MPB Warehouse" wrote:
> At 12:12 PM 5/11/2017, Richard C Evans wrote:
>> Interesting. Was going to ask how the
repros were printed since originals
> stone/hand drawn litho.
>
> Can't seem to find an image or any original online, seems unusually rare.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 11 May 2017, at 18:42, Info Movie Poster Art Gallery <i...@mpag.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Re: [
At 12:12 PM 5/11/2017, Richard C Evans wrote:
Interesting. Was going to ask how the repros
were printed since originals stone/hand drawn litho.
Can't seem to find an image or any original online, seems unusually rare.
Sent from my iPhone
On 11 May 2017, at 18:42, Info Movie Poster Art
the paper and ink used back then is quite typical so you should be able to
> determine whether its original or an 80s reprint whether it's linenbacked or
> not .
>
>
>
>
> filip
>
>
>
>
>
> From: MoPo List <mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN
>>>> linenbacked or not .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> filip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
V.AMERICAN.EDU> on behalf of David Lieberman
>> <cinemasterpie...@gmail.com> <mailto:cinemasterpie...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2017 10:53 PM
>> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU <mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>
>> Subject: [MOPO] Help
<cinemasterpie...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, May 6, 2017 10:53 PM
> *To:* MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> *Subject:* [MOPO] Help please with LOLITA French 1p
>
>
> We have this poster:
>
> http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/52017/sh1.jpg
>
>
>
>
> Originally folded, now line
urday, May 6, 2017 10:53 PM
*To:* MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
*Subject:* [MOPO] Help please with LOLITA French 1p
We have this poster:
http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/52017/sh1.jpg
Originally folded, now linen backed. Looks exactly like the ones
Heritage has sold.
Someone emailed us and s
From: MoPo List <mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> on behalf of David Lieberman
<cinemasterpie...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2017 10:53 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: [MOPO] Help please with LOLITA French 1p
We have this p
No fold discolouration?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 6 May 2017, at 21:53, David Lieberman wrote:
>
>
> We have this poster:
>
> http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/52017/sh1.jpg
>
>
> Originally folded, now linen backed. Looks exactly like the ones Heritage has
>
We have this poster:
http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/52017/sh1.jpg
Originally folded, now linen backed. Looks exactly like the ones Heritage
has sold.
Someone emailed us and said it looks like the 1980's reprint. I've seen
rolled reprints but never a folded linen backed one.
Dave
--
16 matches
Mail list logo