On Dec 6, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Ron Kulp xa...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 6, 2013, at 10:25 AM, MarshaV val...@att.net wrote:
I think by 'value rigidity' RMP means, in the Buddhist sense, attachment.
Ron:
I would agree, but where I think
RMP diverges from
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 6, 2013, at 10:25 AM, MarshaV val...@att.net wrote:
I think by 'value rigidity' RMP means, in the Buddhist sense, attachment.
Ron:
I would agree, but where I think
RMP diverges from Buddhism
Is how to overcome attachment ,
To me, he clearly states that
Ron,
On Dec 7, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Ron Kulp xa...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 6, 2013, at 10:25 AM, MarshaV val...@att.net wrote:
I think by 'value rigidity' RMP means, in the Buddhist sense, attachment.
Ron:
I would agree, but where I think
RMP diverges
Ron,
Please ignore last email. I just upgrade to OS X Mavericks and the the system
needs some adjustments. The last email was messed up.
On Dec 7, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Ron Kulp xa...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 6, 2013, at 10:25 AM, MarshaV
Hi MarshaV and All,
DQ/SQ! DQ individuality explores cognitive biases, remaining indefinable.
SQ static quality by definition will never stand alone in DQ individuality.
The perception of DQ precedes definition. Love remains indefinable.
Joe
On 12/7/13 12:27 AM, MarshaV val...@att.net wrote:
