Re: [MORPHMET] Photos vs scan

Hi Neha, Donax are great :) In my personal experience with bivalves, is that it is better to scan. In any case, scan or camera, the machine should be calibrated to check on distortions. I find that the scanners are cheaper and have less distorsion, no issue with scale, etc. thus I prefer it for

Re: [MORPHMET] Photos vs scan

Thanks a lot! On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, 02:24 Marta Rufino, wrote: > Hi Neha, > > Donax are great :) > In my personal experience with bivalves, is that it is better to scan. > In any case, scan or camera, the machine should be calibrated to check on > distortions. > I find

[MORPHMET] Photos vs scan

Dear All, Greetings! I am going to start a project which deals with studying morphological variability between bivalves belonging to Donacidae and Mactridae. The morphological variability would mainly focus on shell shape, internal structures, palial sinus, etc. I already have