o answer this.
>
>
>
> M
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Anderson Feijo [mailto:andefe...@gmail.com <andefe...@gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* Monday, January 1, 2018 11:02 PM
> *To:* Murat Maga <m...@uw.edu> <m...@uw.edu>
> *Cc:* MORPHMET <morphmet@morphometrics.org
Feijo [mailto:andefe...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, January 1, 2018 11:02 PM
*To:* Murat Maga <m...@uw.edu>
*Cc:* MORPHMET <morphmet@morphometrics.org>
*Subject:* Re: [MORPHMET] Doubt Scaling photos
Dear Murat,
Thank you very much for your email and time for explore my dataset. To
perfo
>
> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27038025
>
>
>
> Is there a reason you are not using a single magnification level for all
> your samples?
>
> M
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Anderson Feijo [mailto:andefe...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017
Is there a reason you are not using a single magnification level for all your
samples?
M
[cid:image001.jpg@01D38100.CDDD1E80]
From: Anderson Feijo [mailto:andefe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 1:35 AM
To: MORPHMET <morphmet@morphometrics.org>
Subject: [MORPHMET] Doubt Scaling
Hi everyone,
I am starting a new project using GM working with groups with different
sizes (eg. rodents and small carnivores). I would like to use the whole
dataset combined in the analyses, instead of perform set of analyses for
each sized group. So, I did a test using the same skull and
