Part of the broader miscommunication here (assuming good faith, of course) seems to be around the
use of protocol names vs product names; using "SSH" and "Telnet" to refer to
protocols and not products. The protocol name SSP isn't well-known, and currently the public
recognise only the name of
Roman,
In early May, we had this exchange (also below in this thread). I wrote:
(3) We've had bad experiences in the past with people (especially iSSH on
> iOS) attempting to implement the Mosh protocol, but with imperfect results,
> and users blaming Mosh for the problems. As with these past
