Roman,
In early May, we had this exchange (also below in this thread). I wrote:
(3) We've had bad experiences in the past with people (especially iSSH on
> iOS) attempting to implement the Mosh protocol, but with imperfect results,
> and users blaming Mosh for the problems. As with these past cas
Part of the broader miscommunication here (assuming good faith, of course) seems to be around the
use of protocol names vs product names; using "SSH" and "Telnet" to refer to
protocols and not products. The protocol name SSP isn't well-known, and currently the public
recognise only the name of
I think that's a good observation. I think this conflation has also
happened because there are very few compatible clients and servers.
(Actually, I'm not aware of any other implementation of the mosh-server
component besides mosh).
Would "mosh protocol" be an appropriate compromise between accu