and your posts are so birdy... maybe you should be somethinged ?
> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:10:07 -0500
> From: wjk...@mac.com
> Subject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a hunting issue
> (SHCR)
> To: MOU-NET@LISTS.UMN.EDU
>
> That's one person
PM
To: MOU-NET@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Subject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a
hunting issue
(SHCR)
Why can't you few people talk to each other OFF-LINE??
--
From: "Eric Harrold"
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 8:39 PM
T
x27;s what the delete button is for.
-Original Message-
From: Minnesota Birds [mailto:mou-...@lists.umn.edu] On Behalf Of
jbaum...@usfamily.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 8:42 PM
To: MOU-NET@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Subject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a
hunting issue
(SHCR)
That's what the delete button is for.
-Original Message-
From: Minnesota Birds [mailto:mou-...@lists.umn.edu] On Behalf Of
jbaum...@usfamily.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 8:42 PM
To: MOU-NET@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Subject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a hunting issue
dollars to publish such information. And
> those dollars are getting harder to come by.
>
> Eric Harrold
> Urbana, IL
>
> --- On *Tue, 7/27/10, linda whyte * wrote:
>
>
> From: linda whyte
>
> Subject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a hunting issue
Why can't you few people talk to each other OFF-LINE??
--
From: "Eric Harrold"
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 8:39 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a hunting issue
(SHCR)
Your clarification put
bject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a hunting issue
(SHCR)
To: "Eric Harrold"
Cc: MOU-NET@lists.umn.edu
Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 8:32 PM
They wouldn't publish hard-copy, I hope, except in limited quantity to make
available in libraries that might lack
: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a hunting issue
(SHCR)
To: MOU-NET@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 5:44 PM
Eric,
Your answer suggests a simple solution to part of the issue: perhaps
when monitoring, the agency SHOULD "write it up" to "publish it"
ns for the several crane sub-species."
>
> Seems to me that Jan made a good point that was backed by sound thinking.
>
> Terry Brashear
> Hennepin County, MN
> http://www.naturepixels.com
> birdnird AT yahoo.com
>
> --- On Tue, 7/27/10, Eric Harrold wrote:
>
>
>
winter.
Eric Harrold
Urbana, IL
--- On Tue, 7/27/10, Terence Brashear wrote:
From: Terence Brashear
Subject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a hunting issue
(SHCR)
To: MOU-NET@LISTS.UMN.EDU, "Eric Harrold"
Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 11:14 AM
Eric
Y
point that was backed by sound thinking.
Terry Brashear
Hennepin County, MN
http://www.naturepixels.com
birdnird AT yahoo.com
--- On Tue, 7/27/10, Eric Harrold wrote:
From: Eric Harrold
Subject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a hunting issue
(SHCR)
To: MOU-NET@LISTS.UMN.EDU
D
y
than those that do...in my book anyway.
Eric Harrold
Urbana, IL
--- On Mon, 7/26/10, Stefanie Moss wrote:
From: Stefanie Moss
Subject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a hunting issue
(SHCR)
To: MOU-NET@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 10:08 PM
I don't th
http://www.fiveships.com
>
>
>
>
>> From: Eric Harrold
>> Reply-To: Eric Harrold
>> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:49:25 -0700
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a hunting issue
>> (SHCR)
>>
>> I don't
>
> --- On Mon, 7/26/10, Liz Stanley wrote:
>
>
> From: Liz Stanley
> Subject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a hunting issue
> (SHCR)
> To: MOU-NET@LISTS.UMN.EDU
> Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 1:18 PM
>
>
> I must have missed the
Jul 2010 15:49:25 -0700
> To:
> Subject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a hunting issue
> (SHCR)
>
> I don't buy the notion that MOST birders objecting to the crane season on this
> forum are doing so because of perceived circumvention of the process by th
ctive.
Eric Harrold
Urbana, IL
--- On Mon, 7/26/10, Liz Stanley wrote:
From: Liz Stanley
Subject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a hunting issue
(SHCR)
To: MOU-NET@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 1:18 PM
I must have missed the part of the discussion tha
s.com
> From: Liz Stanley
> Reply-To:
> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:18:43 -0500
> To:
> Subject: Re: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy focused on a hunting issue
> (SHCR)
>
> I must have missed the part of the discussion that was anti-hunting. I
> thought the
I must have missed the part of the discussion that was anti-hunting. I
thought the issue at hand was the lack of an open process for the decision
made by the DNR. Discussing problems with the process, and debating the
end result of it are two different things.
> Folks,
>
> Do yourselves and more
while their money benefits us.
Onward!
Steve
Stevan Hawkins
San Antonio TX
-Original Message-
From: Minnesota Birds [mailto:mou-...@lists.umn.edu] On Behalf Of Eric
Harrold
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 11:14 AM
To: MOU-NET@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Subject: [mou-net] More wasted birder energy foc
Folks,
Do yourselves and more importantly bird conservation a lot of good by finding
something more biologically meaningful to focus on rather than whether 5 or 10
Sandhill Cranes are going to be killed by hunters in Minnesota during a crane
season. This is the kind of thing that makes folks l
20 matches
Mail list logo
