Ben Justice wrote:
My mistake, maybe I got Mozilla confused with the Geko engine or
something like that. Seems like I read that thing was lean and mean.
I just want a non-bulky browser that loads quickly and consumes a minimum
of memory. Mail and news if included, should be an optional
It installs fine, loads the usual splash screen and pops up a window
saying Mozilla has generated errors... I don't even know where the log
file is. This problem is consistent on 0.9.2 3.
Using the following table definition shows vertical lines in Mozilla
0.9.3. It works in IE5 and appears to be valid HTML 4. (Note tags
removed)
table BORDER=1 CELLPADDING=6 CELLSPACING=0 WIDTH=100% ID=T2000
FRAME=box RULES=rows
Also after client side javascript to set an alternating BG
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Peter Lairo wrote:
I would propose, however, that you morph the mail6 keyword into a
*LoRiskHiReward* or *easy2fix* keyword that applies to all Mozilla
components.
We could at least spell them right.
Repeat after me:
Low risk high reward
Easy to fix
Oh, by the way,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Peter Lairo wrote:
I would propose, however, that you morph the mail6 keyword into a
*LoRiskHiReward* or *easy2fix* keyword that applies to all Mozilla
components.
We could at least spell them right.
Repeat after me:
Low risk high reward
Easy
Seref Arikan wrote:
hi, i have the latest rpm relase for redhat, and mozilla just can't get the
list of available groups from my usenet server. i am using outlook express
under vmware now, and oe, does not have any problem getting the list, so
it's not a connection issue .i don't want to use
Asa Dotzler wrote:
Al Smith wrote:
This has happened in Mozilla milestones, and just today I noticed it
in Netscape 6.1. Somehow JavaScript is turning itself on for Main and
News. Does anyone know why this is happening?
When I download a new milestone or nightly of Mozilla, everything
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Peter Lairo wrote:
PPS. What is important is that the *SPYWARE-ENABLING CODE* should be
removed from Mozilla.
See bug: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71270
That's what's known as scare mungering. For your information, this
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Lairo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
We should seriously consider the following question:
What benefit do we have from providing this information - at this
potential cost?
Another question: how hard is it to get the URL from Mozilla's own
widget?
Assuming that
Jason Kratz wrote:
D'Arcy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
K_Fd7.57109$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:K_Fd7.57109$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'd say it is pretty clear that Sun had nothing to worry about JDKs
criticalness of Java. Anyone whith a bit of sense would know that
JTK hadn't done even
hi,
it begins to get the list, and the progress bar indicates, say 130 kbs
reveived in 2 mins, but after some time, unkown error #somecode# is given
with a message box, and i am left with a bunch of groups, which is a very
low percentage of all.
i've tried oe again under vmware, and it took all
Ah, now it all makes sense.
The unknown error alert is a known bug that I think Seth Spitzer is
working on. I don't know if this exact case (using the Subscribe
window) is known.
Does anyone have a bug# handy?
Seref Arikan wrote:
hi,
it begins to get the list, and the progress bar
Peter Lairo wrote:
OK, for all the pedantic, anal retentive people who would rather
obscure the issue and ridicule those who are trying to improve the
system:
PPPS. Insults are the arguments of those who have no arguments. (J.J.
Rousseau, schw.-frz. Phil., 1712-1778)
OMG, after all
Right-clicking is busted in the latest nightly (build 2001081208). Also,
auto-completion has been broken on the trunk for about a week. Has anyone
else noticed?
For example, until ten years or so ago, most of New Zealand had only
three TV channels. This allowed the user interface for choosing a
channel to be really simple -- my family's TV set, for example, has four
buttons, labelled `1' through `4'. Now, however, when many of us have
Doh! I just
JSA wrote:
Right-clicking is busted in the latest nightly (build 2001081208). Also,
auto-completion has been broken on the trunk for about a week. Has anyone
else noticed?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990
Clarence
In the field chooser there is no option for 'addressee'. When I look at my
sent items I can see that I sent all the emails (surprise surprise) but I
can't see who I sent them to which can be very useful.
Any chance this could be added in?
Simon
Matthew Thomas wrote:
Jason Bassford wrote:
massive snip
No. All this discussion is evidence of is that Peter Lairo likes adding
keywords to bugs. This fact is well-known to anyone who gets a lot of
bugmail involving the front end of Mozilla, since a noticable proportion
of said bugmail
RV wrote:
Peter Lairo wrote:
OK, for all the pedantic, anal retentive people who would rather
obscure the issue and ridicule those who are trying to improve the
system:
PPPS. Insults are the arguments of those who have no arguments. (J.J.
Rousseau, schw.-frz. Phil., 1712-1778)
I have just got an e-mail that was split into 33 e-mails, each with
part of the attachment I want to extract and join. I originally thought
that makeing a mail-box, copying the messages into there and then
dragging that to Aladdin Expander would do the job. Since the mail
box is now binary I
JTK/Gary Van Sickle wrote:
[snip]
It turns
out that the Braemar company he designs heart monitors for, had to
recall a bunch of them. They were faulty, and the FDA ordered a recall.
The judge will likely order you to correct this yourself, but just for
the record, the FDA did not order
Peter Lairo wrote:
Maybe you're too focused on getting the list smaller at all costs, and
therefore refusing to accept even a beneficial new keyword.
Low rick and high reward bugs are highly subjective, and a new keyword to
further clutter things up is inviting abuse.
it is
jesus X wrote:
D'Arcy Smith wrote:
Please don't feed the trolls. Replying to their posts about Mozilla's technical
abilitiesis one thing, but this is nowhere near on topic. This just encourages
them. :)
Rabbi, word to the wise, you do not want to get involved in this
pathology.
--
Gary
This is the same bug as http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85475
I agree it would be nice to see this added.
Cheers,
Shawn
Simon Tompson wrote:
In the field chooser there is no option for 'addressee'. When I look at my
sent items I can see that I sent all the emails (surprise
Nope, still busted- using build 2001081303.
Peter Lairo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
JSA wrote:
Right-clicking is busted in the latest nightly (build 2001081208).
Also,
auto-completion has been broken on the trunk for about a week. Has
Al Smith wrote:
This has happened in Mozilla milestones, and just today I noticed
it in Netscape 6.1. Somehow JavaScript is turning itself on for
Main and News. Does anyone know why this is happening?
When I download a new milestone or nightly of Mozilla, everything
is already turned on
For the first time a complete ECMAScript is available for the PalmOS.
With this 4.40 release of device Javascript even large scripts can run
in very little memory (e.g. Nombas' memory-caching your program requires
less than 11K to initialize engine and all ECMA objects, less than 1K to
compile a
JTK wrote:
Rabbi, word to the wise, you do not want to get involved in this
pathology.
In this set of newsgroups, I don't want ANYONE getting involved. Old wars
between you and OffTopicMan should not spill over to here.
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton
I dont know if this is the correct place to report this but here it is
anyways, If there is a specific place in bugzilla to report this tell me
and I will try.
this site:
http://www.interestratecalculator.com/mortgage/mortgage.html
works in netscape and fails in mozilla.
I have mozilla .0.9.3
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Lairo wrote:
Greediy companies are not interested in formatting your hard drive or to
whom you are sending jucy love leters - there is no profit in that.
There IS, however, a large profit in having a *detailed analysis* of
peoples browsing habbits.
Chris Hoess wrote:
Except that the address book, and the information in it tying together
email addresses, street addresses, names, and various other personal data
seems like it would be just as useful a thing to snatch for marketing.
Shall we remove the address book, too? It's clearly
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001 23:54:28 -0500, Jerry Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my experience, 0.9.3 is the first version to handle forms well. Prior
to this version, I was experiencing parts of forms disappearing, buttons
overlayed over other buttons, etc.
For me, Mozilla 0.9.3 has been a
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:24:06 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It installs fine, loads the usual splash screen and pops up a window
saying Mozilla has generated errors... I don't even know where the log
file is. This problem is consistent on 0.9.2 3.
The error file should be in
Peter Lairo wrote:
RV wrote:
Peter Lairo wrote:
OK, for all the pedantic, anal retentive people who would rather
obscure the issue and ridicule those who are trying to improve the
system:
PPPS. Insults are the arguments of those who have no arguments. (J.J.
Rousseau, schw.-frz.
Jason Bassford wrote:
first thing I'd recommend is getting to know some of the other Mac
developers on the project. Check out the netscape.public.mozilla.mac
newsgroup and maybe introduce yourself there. If you haven't already,
start downloading daily Fizzilla builds
...and more
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jacek Piskozub wrote:
You can avoid writing such details in addressbook (actually I think most
people never bothers). You cannot avoid opening URLs if you want to see
the Web pages.
Good point. But the spyware can still slurp up the profiles directory and
use
Asa Dotzler wrote:
Every other browser you have ever installed keeps the URL in a
native field. Mozilla isn't doing anything different from any other
browser.
A pity. I would like Mozilla to do better than other browser :-(
Jacek
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Peter Lairo wrote:
Let's use the definition of the mail6 keyword and expand it to include
all Mozilla components (not just mail). The name of the morphed keyword
doesn't have to be what I suggested, it could be something else. The
description could include cautionary
Peter Lairo wrote:
So when we import bananas from Israel, they start out as square
bananas and arrive as round bananas.
Yes, and when I boot my Windows machine, it falls off the desk and I
bruise my toe. We're not talking about international trade; we're
talking about computer software.
T H I S - P R O G R A M - will - m o l d
- y o u - i n t o - a -
N E T - P r i v a t e - E y e !
Locate hidden emails,
telephone numbers, or addresses.
Find
debtors
and locate hidden
assets.
Check criminal and driving
records.
Look up
someone's employment
history. and even
get your
Bernd Mielke wrote:
Please read http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41262 and the
whole dependency tree.
Bernd
Bernd
Thanks for the pointer.
Arn
Ever since day one, Mozilla has had a problem with the cookies used on
Ultimate Bulletin Board (http://www.infopop.com) based websites. Has
anybody else noticed this? Two forums I use on a regular basis are
http://www.avsforum.com and http://www.kusat.com. When using either
site, I am
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, JTK wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Peter Lairo wrote:
Let's use the definition of the mail6 keyword and expand it to include
all Mozilla components (not just mail). The name of the morphed keyword
doesn't have to be what I suggested, it could
Bob Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 13 Aug 2001:
I use the web site and have to switch browsers. So if you need
people to complain etc, to get capitol one to support the browser
tell me or post to this thread.
I have also heard that you can
I thought when I dl'ed the jre before I was using mozilla that it was
supposed to replace the jre that navigator used. In fact I see the
plug-ins in the navigator plug-in directory. How do I verify which jre
version netscape is running? How did you do it?
thanks
bob
Pratik wrote:
This
I thought when I dl'ed the jre before I was using mozilla that it was
supposed to replace the jre that navigator used. In fact I see the
plug-ins in the navigator plug-in directory. How do I verify which jre
version netscape is running? How did you do it?
thanks
bob
Pratik wrote:
This
Peter Lairo wrote:
Actually, my plan is to annihilate this commi free-for-all project, Ha
Ha H H (now imagine thunder and lightning accompanying
my sinister bellowing laughter). Well meaning fools, I will destroy
you in the end.
Sounds like JTK to me
Bob Davis wrote:
I thought when I dl'ed the jre before I was using mozilla that it was
supposed to replace the jre that navigator used. In fact I see the
plug-ins in the navigator plug-in directory. How do I verify which jre
version netscape is running? How did you do it?
thanks
bob
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], RV says...
Peter Lairo wrote:
Actually, my plan is to annihilate this commi free-for-all project, Ha
Ha H H (now imagine thunder and lightning accompanying
my sinister bellowing laughter). Well meaning fools, I will destroy
you in the
Bob Davis wrote:
I thought when I dl'ed the jre before I was using mozilla that it was
supposed to replace the jre that navigator used. In fact I see the
plug-ins in the navigator plug-in directory. How do I verify which jre
version netscape is running? How did you do it?
thanks
bob
Mike
There''s a nug report on this error. It relates to earlier versions
of Mozilla being left on the machine. Also comes up when you're trying
to send forms.
Try a complete uninstall and reinstall. Works fine on Win 2k here -
once I did that.
Jerry Baker wrote:
Mike Koenecke wrote:
>
> On or
Can anyone help me please.
I wish to find out the correct method of installing a plugin DLL and XPT
file when an HTML page comes
up requesting a plugin. In the past and during the testing phase I have
placed the plugin DLL and XPT file directly
into the components directory, and running the
(I posted some questions in this vein in netscape.devs-plugins earlier
today, but upon further examination, it looks to me like that
newsgroup is for Netscape 4.x questions, whereas I've got Netscape 6
questions. so I'm reposting here.)
I have a SmartUpdate installer which works in Netscape 4.x.
53 matches
Mail list logo
