Here is the page location.
http://www.oo-xx.com/bbs/
The page creates a scroller div and sets its height to 30px. Then it
forgets to actually set overflow to scroll for that div. As a result
overflow is visible. Now the div has a height of 30px, so the
following content starts 30px below
Title: MYCASINOBUILDER.COM
"Revenues from
online gambling set to grow from $7 billion in 2001 to $21 billion
in 2005..."
Source: Greenfield Online, October 15, 2001
December 25, 2001
You won't believeyour eyes!
Hear your fantasiescome alive
Instant access to hotamateur webcam action
Want to get lucky???Play with them!!!48 Puzzle Pieces
Make Your
nearco wrote:
How do these differ? What is the main difference?
I can just see it ... a post by JTK that says Nothing.
Am I good or what?
Luke wrote:
It's gone from pretty stable in 0.9.6 to buggy in 0.9.7. Lots of
obnoxious gui bugs and trouble with downloads now.
did you try a new profile as well? This should clear up alot of stuff
for you.
-dman84
Peter Lairo wrote:
Subject:
Re: Herr Gilbert ist außer Haus.
From:
Peter Lairo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Wed, 26 Dec 2001 14:10:15 +0100
Newsgroups:
netscape.public.mozilla.general
Roland Felnhofer
Volker Dormeyer wrote:
Hi,
mozilla automatically does an unzip of zipped files during download.
I. e. If I download a gziped file via http or ftp it will be gunziped by
mozilla. Is there any way to stop that behaviour?
Weird... my mozilla doesn't...
I suppose it is a helper app you've
DeMoN LaG wrote:
-snip-
Considering there is no one to complain to at Mozilla, as there is no
end user support, I fail to see how this is an issue
Well I can vouch there is at least one end user testing Mozilla. grin (myself)
I know others as well that are too. Although
Gord McFee wrote:
On 12/25/01 9:51 AM, Jay Garcia wrote:
Robert wrote:
How can I export my mail from Outlook 2000 and import it to Netscape?
Thanks.
Netscape what ??? Communicator ?? NS 6.x ??? Mozilla ??
If I am not mistaken, both Netscape 4.79 and 6.21 import Outlook
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Gord McFee wrote:
How can I export my mail from Outlook 2000 and import it to Netscape?
Thanks.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Note for the Mac Platform:
Communicator actually does not. Its a process involving Eudora.
JTK wrote:
Oh no! You didn't recommend Mozilla to end users, did you? Now we'll
have all these people asking for technical support in the Mozilla
newsgroups! :-(
I want to use and recommend free software,
not Netscape proprietary and obsolete version. And mozilla works very
well even
No nightly has fixed this one yet.
Basically, if I wipe my profile, the first run is fine. Anything after,
however, and I lose all of the text in the UI (buttons, etc), right
clicks on objects (ie, bookmarks) in the ui instead of giving a menu
give a little blank square.
Anybody know what this
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Considering there is no one to complain to at Mozilla, as there is no
end user support, I fail to see how this is an issue
Well I can vouch there is at least one end user testing Mozilla. grin (myself)
I know others as well that are too. Although they do
JTK wrote:
[snip]
until I got it through my skull that the Mozilla project was
not interested in succeeding and delivering a viable product.
If that is your opinion, may I ask why you are still reading the Mozilla
newsgroups?
--
/Jonas
Esber wrote:
Would anyone please help me. How
come all my incoming email goes to
my
trash folder instead of
inbox...thanks
Edit | Message Filters
Do you have a filter there that moves stuff into trash?
--
/Jonas
COPY
ANY DVD MOVIE!
With our revolutionary software you can
copy virtually
any DVD Movie using your existing equipment!
Conventional DVD copying equipment can cost thousands of $$
Our DVD Wizard cost less than the price of 2 DVD Movies!
Free Live
Hi,
I ve got troubles I do not understand :(
In my site you can use diaporama mode to see all photos automatically:
http://www.siova.net/photos/index.php?type=sceimg=sce_0001pref_size=768diapo=1#seeimg
I works well with 0.9.5 and all IE version. But since 0.9.6 the onLoad
does not work:
img
What's wrong ? Why Mozilla does wait having downloaded the Image to
launch the function launch_diapo() ?
I mean:
What's wrong ? Why Mozilla doesn't wait having downloaded the Image to launch the
function launch_diapo() ?
French-english strange sentences ;)
--
This is on the Net, this
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
---snip---
Mozilla is targeted at developers. If you are an end user, wouldn't you be
better off with Beonex or Netscape instead?
--
/Jonas
actually no. on the Mac Platform Netscape 6 and Communicator 4.7.9 share
the exact same Type and creator
Steve wrote:
[snip]
Not if you're using CVS, which unless you are you shouldn't bother. The
initial checkout will take forever, but so little changes day-to-day
that updates happen extrememly quickly. I did this myself for a while
over 56K until I got it through my skull that the Mozilla
Hmmm, this quadruple-spacing is still here.
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Subject:
Re: Mozilla/Netscape Showes this Website Incorrectly
From:
Jonas Jørgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Wed, 26 Dec 2001 17:58:00
Volker Dormeyer wrote:
I. e. If I download a gziped file via http or ftp it will be gunziped by
mozilla. Is there any way to stop that behaviour?
Known Bug:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116445
--
Greetings to Echelon and the NSA:
president usa attack world trade center
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 26 Dec 2001:
snip usual worthless drivel
NETSCAPE HAS A DIFFERENT SPLASH SCREEN AND THAT SOMEHOW MAKES IT
END-USER USABLE!
Netscape is a company with money to provide people to help end users
with problems. If
DeMoN LaG wrote:
actually no. on the Mac Platform Netscape 6 and Communicator 4.7.9
share the exact same Type and creator Codes APPL / MOSS.
Shoulda kept your mouth shut, Jonas. Now we gotta here the whole speel
about type and creator codes again.
Sorry.
I don't know much about
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Mozilla is targeted at developers. If you are an end user, wouldn't you be
better off with Beonex or Netscape instead?
actually no. on the Mac Platform Netscape 6 and Communicator 4.7.9 share
the exact same Type and creator Codes APPL / MOSS.
...and what
JTK wrote:
Mozilla is targeted at developers. If you are an end user, wouldn't you be
better off with Beonex or Netscape instead?
Indeed. Those are known to be defect-free.
I never said that Netscape 6 was defect free. But it doesn't have Debug
and QA menus, and it doesn't contain
Because the point of the creator codes is to have them equal for _one_
application. Netscape 6 is, by the name (!), a new version of Netscape. So
Commun. 4.x and Netsc. 6 have the same creator code. Netscape _should_ leave
the same code.
Jonas can change it on his own if it bugs him that much.
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
JTK wrote:
Mozilla is targeted at developers. If you are an end user, wouldn't
you be
better off with Beonex or Netscape instead?
Indeed. Those are known to be defect-free.
I never said that Netscape 6 was defect free. But it doesn't have Debug
and QA
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 26 Dec 2001:
Huh?!? The whole THING is only half done! And half is rather
generous.
So half done that CNet, ZDNet and TechTV, among many other places, have ranked it
equal to or better than IE6. Imagine when
Vincent wrote:
What's wrong ? Why Mozilla does wait having downloaded the Image to
launch the function launch_diapo() ?
I mean:
What's wrong ? Why Mozilla doesn't wait having downloaded the Image to
launch the function launch_diapo() ?
French-english strange sentences ;)
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Mozilla is targeted at developers.
No, alas it's not...
Features like the default for Save Page being Complete Page, using the
title as the default filename for Save Page, a _very_ poorly
implemented full screen mode and others show that Mozilla is in fact
targeted
Okay, thank you.
S. Merde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Nope, it's possible. You just have to do the work.
Mozilla currently renders it's own controls so all it uses are the basic
drawing routines. It currently uses GTK on linux, but it doesn't use
Vincent wrote:
I works well with 0.9.5 and all IE version. But since 0.9.6 the onLoad
does not work:
img width=768 onload=javascript:launch_diapo() ; height=512
src=url_image.jpg
Hm... it could be http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62288
Could also be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (JTK) wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David W. Fenton wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (JTK) wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
the
overall theory of operation of Mozilla is to completely crap
out if an I isn't crossed or a T isn't dotted in the HTML*,
but what do you expect from AOL?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jonas Jørgensen) wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mozilla is targeted at developers. If you are an end user,
wouldn't you be better off with Beonex or Netscape instead?
No. Netscape sucks and has all sorts of crap I don't want.
Mozilla is *great* for end users, even in the
I looked on Bugzilla and Google for this, and no one seems to have
said anything about this.
I'm on Win95 OSR2 running Mozilla 0.9.6 (and loving it, of course).
I used tabs all the time, and have found the close X to be
unreliable. that is, I have some difficulty clicking on it and
having the
OK, I've looked on Google and Bugzilla for this one, too, and
didn't find anything. I'm using 0.9.6 on Win95 OSR2.
When I open the History window (having it take over part of the
browser window is an IE-copycat abomination, of course), and change
the view (I hate the IE-derived Grouped view),
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Dec 2001:
actually no. on the Mac Platform Netscape 6 and Communicator 4.7.9
share the exact same Type and creator Codes APPL / MOSS.
Shoulda kept your mouth shut,
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Mozilla is targeted at developers. If you are an end user, wouldn't you be
better off with Beonex or Netscape instead?
actually no. on the Mac Platform Netscape 6 and Communicator 4.7.9 share
the exact same Type and creator
David W. Fenton wrote:
I looked on Bugzilla and Google for this, and no one seems to have
said anything about this.
Anyone else notice this?
Me too ;-) Yep, the clickable area should be bigger, and the close
button could be nicer. I also like this feature pretty much.
Best wishes
Gunnar
JTK wrote:
Indeed. I found it impossible to find yet another wheel to reinvent, or
re-reinvent even more poorly, so I gave up.
So you're admitting you're inadequacy. Finally. Now if we could just understand
why you are still in the newsgroups despite having given up on Mozilla, we'll
all be
Asa Dotzler wrote:
On December 21, 2001 mozilla.org made available for download binaries of
the Mozilla 0.9.7 Milestone. The builds and release notes are
availbable at http://www.mozilla.org/releases/. New to this milestone
are fixes for about 1,400 bugs including:
* The Labels feature
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Dec 2001:
Unless things have changed since DOS/W3.11.W 95 days when you
double click on an application you have to browse to the
application you desire open said document. Or you have topen
Gunnar S wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
Me too ;-) Yep, the clickable area should be bigger, and the close
button could be nicer. I also like this feature pretty much.
Actually, the X is raised now...
Don't remember if this went in for 0.9.7, but it is on the trunk.
--
Morten Nilsen, aka
NETSCAPE HAS A DIFFERENT SPLASH SCREEN AND THAT SOMEHOW MAKES IT
END-USER USABLE!
Netscape is a company with money to provide people to help end users
with problems. If Mozilla were to allocate resources and people to help
out end users, there would be no work going on towards the project.
Cat wrote:
Not if you're using CVS, which unless you are you shouldn't bother. The
initial checkout will take forever, but so little changes day-to-day
that updates happen extrememly quickly. I did this myself for a while
over 56K until I got it through my skull that the Mozilla project
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
JTK wrote:
[snip]
until I got it through my skull that the Mozilla project was
not interested in succeeding and delivering a viable product.
If that is your opinion, may I ask why you are still reading the Mozilla
newsgroups?
You may. The answer is, I'm
DeMoN LaG wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 26 Dec 2001:
snip usual worthless drivel
NETSCAPE HAS A DIFFERENT SPLASH SCREEN AND THAT SOMEHOW MAKES IT
END-USER USABLE!
Netscape is a company with money to provide people to help end
DeMoN LaG wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 26 Dec 2001:
Huh?!? The whole THING is only half done! And half is rather
generous.
So half done that CNet, ZDNet and TechTV, among many other places, have ranked it
equal to or better
I would like to see my mozilla without some of the
components in the components bar.
Where in the code base the components
(IM,Composer,address book) get embedded into the
communicator?
Where are the JS that invoke the components.
Thanks in advance,
Annies.
img width=768 onload=javascript:launch_diapo() ; height=512
src=url_image.jpg
Try taking out the javascript: part from the onload attribute value,
leaving:
onload=launch_diapo();
I'm surprised the code ever worked in Mozilla as written and that it
works in IE
Boris
-
JTK wrote:
I don't recall ever claiming to be so damned smart; just old enough to
know better.
So why don't you?
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
The Type/Creator code system is not such a bad idea. remember you have 4
places in creator code and Type code. You can concevieably use any of
the 26 letters in the alphabet in each place. I hope my math is right
but the are 26 to the fourth power different
David W. Fenton wrote:
[snip]
If IE had not been designed to render invalid HTML (i.e.,
guessing what the web page is *supposed* to look like), then
there would not be all these load-of-crap HTML editors that
produce invalid HTML, since users would discard them when they
saw that
jesus X wrote:
JTK wrote:
Indeed. I found it impossible to find yet another wheel to reinvent, or
re-reinvent even more poorly, so I gave up.
So you're admitting you're inadequacy.
I am admitting that I am inadequate to the monumetal inadequacy required
by the Mozilla project, yes.
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
NETSCAPE HAS A DIFFERENT SPLASH SCREEN AND THAT SOMEHOW MAKES IT
END-USER USABLE!
Netscape is a company with money to provide people to help end users
with problems. If Mozilla were to allocate resources and people to help
out end users, there would be no work
I recently installed 0.9.7 (milestone not nightly) and was messing with the
javascript controls to block pop-up windows. seems it blocks all pop-up
windows not just the ones that open on load or close. I have a lot of
sites that use javascript to open new windows to add data or display an
posted mailed
On Wednesday 26 December 2001 10:31 pm, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
I want to browse a machine on my LAN whose web server runs off port
79. I can do so with the lynx, konqueror and opera browsers, as I
expect.
But both Mozilla (0.9.4) and Galeon (0.12.1) browsers instantly
Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
posted mailed
On Wednesday 26 December 2001 10:31 pm, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
I want to browse a machine on my LAN whose web server runs off port
79. I can do so with the lynx, konqueror and opera browsers, as I
expect.
-Chuck
Quoting
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Dec 2001:
My great-grandchildren will be driving to work in nuclear-powered
hovercraft and eating their meals in pill form by then.
And I bet their hovercraft and the machine that dispenses their pills
runs an
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 27 Dec 2001:
And yet it's missing. Maybe their was only decaf in the
webmaster's lunchroom that day, who knows. And what the heck,
let's raise the stakes a little - the web page with the missing
/TABLE is patient
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 27 Dec 2001:
Finally. Now if we could just understand
why you are still in the newsgroups despite having given up on
Mozilla, we'll all be happy.
No, I suspect you won't.
Now not only do you tell people how to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Right, it is quite a bit better than Netscape 6.1. IE 3.0 was quite a
bit better than Netscape 6.1, years ago. Communicator 4.7x is better
than both of them, especially in the mail/news department.
Browser-wise, IE6 beats the bejesus out of all of
63 matches
Mail list logo
