Well, I'm new to bug filing and the sort. I've registered a Bugzilla
account and voted for the bugs that I have found as duplicates, but
since I can't find one for the tooltip saying who has messages, I'm
asking for a little help here. I know I risk being run down as a
no-nothing who should
Thanks! I probably did it wrong, but just to let everyone know, I've
filed two bugs in Bugzilla: Bug 130961 and Bug 131026. I hope that's
what I should have done. Thank you guys very much! Here's links:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130961
Kenneth Pardue wrote:
Thanks! I probably did it wrong, but just to let everyone know, I've
filed two bugs in Bugzilla: Bug 130961 and Bug 131026. I hope that's
what I should have done. Thank you guys very much! Here's links:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130961
TOO LARGE TO BE READ, FORGET IT
Kenneth Pardue wrote:
I'm really loving the way that Mozilla/Netscape is heading. The
browser is very impressive, and I can't wait to see the progress that's
been made in Mozilla reflect in Netscape 6.x. I've been looking at the
new (that is, finally
Also when it gives the pop up menu saying so-in-so has new messages,
it seems to be tied to the account name. Wouldn't it be more prudent to
make this the display name for the account, or even better, let the user
choose his or her name?
File a bug on this one, certainly (and your other
Lancer Charade wrote:
TOO LARGE TO BE READ, FORGET IT
If you don't want to read it, you don't have to - but do however many
hundred people have to be informed of this feeling?
Gerv
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:25:27 -0600, Kenneth Pardue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm really loving the way that Mozilla/Netscape is heading. The
browser is very impressive, and I can't wait to see the progress that's
been made in Mozilla reflect in Netscape 6.x. I've been looking at the
new
Werner Purrer wrote:
first of all konqueror has improved greatly it is not that far behind
gecko anymore in compatibility and rendering speed, secondly you can
switch to gecko from konq on the fly... :-)
Yes, definetely. On KDE Mozilla will have a hard time. Konqueror is
great, it's my
Holger Metzger wrote:
Werner Purrer wrote:
first of all konqueror has improved greatly it is not that far behind
gecko anymore in compatibility and rendering speed, secondly you can
switch to gecko from konq on the fly... :-)
Yes, definetely. On KDE Mozilla will have a hard time.
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 12:02:43 +0100, Georg =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Maa=DF?=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bullshit. Konqueror is unasable.
Be prepared for a big surprise once KDE3 is out :-)
Georg Maaß wrote:
bullshit. Konqueror is unasable.
How nice. I guess you never used it then. On the other hand, maybe it
was just too complicated for you. :-)
- Holge
Werner Purrer wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 12:02:43 +0100, Georg =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Maa=DF?=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bullshit. Konqueror is unasable.
Be prepared for a big surprise once KDE3 is out :-)
If KDE3 moves more into Windows direction, I won't upgrade. I also don't
like KDE2
Holger Metzger wrote:
Georg Maaß wrote:
bullshit. Konqueror is unasable.
How nice. I guess you never used it then.
I 've tested it and don't use it for other stuff than managing files.
And also this is much more worse than in KDE1. There is no reason for it.
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:07:29 +0100, Georg =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Maa=DF?=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Werner Purrer wrote:
If KDE3 moves more into Windows direction, I won't upgrade. I also don't
like KDE2 becaus it is to Windows like. I prefer KDE 1, which is more
Mac like and much faster.
Actually
How nice. I guess you never used it then.
I 've tested it and don't use it for other stuff than managing files.
And also this is much more worse than in KDE1. There is no reason for it.
Can we please not have this argument here? If you must bicker, please do
it by email. Thank you :-)
Kenneth Pardue wrote:
Also, when I post I'd like to mark the thread to be
watched even though no replies have been made to it yet. I have no idea
if it marks the message as watched or not; there is no watched icon for
a message unless there have been replies!
Known bug -- see
Kenneth Pardue wrote:
Regarding the mail notification... IT'S ABOUT TIME! One of the concepts
I love is to have Moz humming away in the background, having all of my
connections still running, checking my mail etc. on my nice cable modem
and being able to tell at a glance at the screen in
Gervase Markham wrote:
Also when it gives the pop up menu saying so-in-so has new messages,
it seems to be tied to the account name. Wouldn't it be more prudent to
make this the display name for the account, or even better, let the user
choose his or her name?
File a bug on this one,
Parish wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
Also when it gives the pop up menu saying so-in-so has new messages,
it seems to be tied to the account name. Wouldn't it be more prudent to
make this the display name for the account, or even better, let the user
choose his or her name?
File a bug
browser is very impressive, and I can't wait to see the progress that's
been made in Mozilla reflect in Netscape 6.x. I've been looking at the
new (that is, finally fixed) features in Mozilla, and I have a few brief
(mainly cosmetic) comments:
Regarding the mail notification... IT'S ABOUT
One other thing I forgot to mention (and also a way for me to mark my
thread as watched and actually be able to see it ;-)), It would be
incredibly useful if there were an option to make labeled messages bold
(as though they were unread mail). Talk about make it easy to spot!
Best regards,
Kenneth Pardue wrote:
One other thing I forgot to mention (and also a way for me to mark my
thread as watched and actually be able to see it ;-)), It would be
incredibly useful if there were an option to make labeled messages bold
(as though they were unread mail). Talk about make it easy
22 matches
Mail list logo
