Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-14 Thread Eric Vaandering
dman84 wrote: print preview: good. printing: getting better, dont know how, but its got a few problems still. Both are totally fubar on linux. Zero progress in the last year.

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-14 Thread JTK
Eric Vaandering wrote: dman84 wrote: print preview: good. printing: getting better, dont know how, but its got a few problems still. Both are totally fubar on linux. Zero progress in the last year. Well I mean come on now, it's only been a year! It's not like they haven't

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-14 Thread Blake Ross
Well I mean come on now, it's only been a year! It's not like they haven't been working on all kinds of other stuff, such as... well there's the... um... oh! There's a context menu now! That's what took a year! Yeah, see, they were working on it all year, and I just happened to

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-14 Thread Sören Kuklau
Blake Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Well I mean come on now, it's only been a year! It's not like they haven't been working on all kinds of other stuff, such as... well there's the... um... oh! There's a context menu now!

How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread David Gerard
On track? I know what the Bugzilla dependency tree looks like, I want to know how it feels to you guys. -- http://thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/ http://www.rocknerd.org/ RPGs are the geek equivalent of test cricket. (Barbarella)

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread dman84
David Gerard wrote: On track? I know what the Bugzilla dependency tree looks like, I want to know how it feels to you guys. feels like a few more milestones, about 3-4, maybe 5: to give a general overview from my perspective: fallouts from patches has created a Mozilla build that

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread Jonathan Wilson
download manager still needs to land. Download manager? Way cool, no more need to use GetRight (which doesnt want to play nice with mozilla anyway)

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread Dan Howard
dman84 wrote: sidebar in mail/news content is horked, horked? IMUI, I have no idea what that one means.

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread Sören Kuklau
Dan Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... dman84 wrote: sidebar in mail/news content is horked, horked? IMUI, I have no idea what that one means. Erm... how about totally messed up?

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread Sören Kuklau
Jonathan Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... download manager still needs to land. Download manager? Way cool, no more need to use GetRight Yes, Netscape's MachV also includes a download manager. Both Mozilla (at 1.0.0?) and Netscape

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread JTK
Jonathan Wilson wrote: download manager still needs to land. Download manager? Read: Ad pump. Way cool, no more need to use GetRight (which doesnt want to play nice with mozilla anyway)

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread Ian Davey
JTK wrote: Jonathan Wilson wrote: download manager still needs to land. Download manager? Read: Ad pump. You're think SmartDownload. Have you read the spec for Download Manager? ian.

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread Sören Kuklau
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Jonathan Wilson wrote: download manager still needs to land. Download manager? Read: Ad pump. Read: Hey, let's go on bashing Mozilla!

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread Mike Koenecke
In article a1mtd6$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sören Kuklau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Jonathan Wilson wrote: download manager still needs to land. Download manager? Read: Ad pump. Read: Hey, let's go on

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread Sören Kuklau
Mike Koenecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... In article a1mtd6$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sören Kuklau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Jonathan Wilson wrote:

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread Jonas Jørgensen
Dan Howard wrote: dman84 wrote: sidebar in mail/news content is horked, horked? IMUI, I have no idea what that one means. http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?String=wildcardAcronym=imuiFind=Find: Sorry, imui was not found in the database.

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread David Gerard
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 07:19:37 -0500, Dan Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :dman84 wrote: : sidebar in mail/news content is horked, :horked? IMUI, I have no idea what that one means. 'broken', 'non-functional', 'corrupted', etc. -- http://thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread David Gerard
On 11 Jan 2002 14:59:08 GMT, Mike Koenecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :In article a1mtd6$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sören Kuklau [EMAIL PROTECTED] :writes: :JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag :[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... : Jonathan Wilson wrote: : download manager still needs

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread Blake Ross
Wow, you know more about download manager than the person implementing it! :-) See the spec, http://mozilla.org/xpapps/MachVPlan/DownloadMgr.html. I don't see any space for an ad in the UI, right now anyway (at no point would it affect Mozilla if such a thing did get implemented). Blake JTK

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread JTK
David Gerard wrote: On 11 Jan 2002 14:59:08 GMT, Mike Koenecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :In article a1mtd6$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sören Kuklau [EMAIL PROTECTED] :writes: :JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag :[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... : Jonathan Wilson wrote: :

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread Ben Ruppel (slate)
Am I the only one who doesn't want to touch print preview with a ten foot pole? On my win32 nightly, the print preview is shown with some weird scrollbars and a black border on the top, bottom, and left, but not right side, which looks weird. Also, I'm not sure how you're supposed to exit

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread cr
Ben Ruppel (slate) wrote: Am I the only one who doesn't want to touch print preview with a ten foot pole? On my win32 nightly, the print preview is shown with some weird scrollbars and a black border on the top, bottom, and left, but not right side, which looks weird. Also, I'm not sure

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread Ben Ruppel
What version of mozilla are you using? It's definitely horked on win32 builds dated january 11th. I just crashed it again by hitting back. The page layout doesn't complete and I can't scroll vertically sometimes. I don't get a black border all around. cr wrote: Ben Ruppel (slate) wrote:

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread David Gerard
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:01:03 -0600, JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :David Gerard wrote: : He's not useless, just, ahh, socially retarded. :How 'bout let's try: Not afraid to loudly ask the questions the Man :doesn't want asked. Nah, I think socially retarded covers it. You're certainly not

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread David Gerard
On 11 Jan 2002 23:58:36 GMT, Glenn Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :Some drink from the Fountain of Knowledge; and yet the Tree of Life is :also the choice of some. However, on 12 Jan 2002, David Gerard (amongst :others) drank deeply from netscape.public.mozilla.general and the :following