i can only asume somone is taking on the role of mr rsole
Jens Schlatter wrote:
Why is it microsoft allowed to use the signature mozilla in their
internet explorer?
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)
Jens
Fup2 netscape.public.mozilla.license
on the role of mr rsole
Jens Schlatter wrote:
Why is it microsoft allowed to use the signature mozilla in their
internet explorer?
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)
Jens
Fup2 netscape.public.mozilla.license
Why is it microsoft allowed to use the signature mozilla in their
internet explorer?
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)
Jens
Fup2 netscape.public.mozilla.license
Am 24.12.2001 12:29 schrieb Jens Schlatter:
Why is it microsoft allowed to use the signature mozilla in their
internet explorer?
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)
This has mostly historical reasons back from the days when Mozilla
(Netscape) dominated the WWW and every other
Why is it microsoft allowed to use the signature mozilla in their
internet explorer?
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)
This has mostly historical reasons back from the days when Mozilla
(Netscape) dominated the WWW and every other browser had to disguise as
Mozilla
Jens Schlatter wrote:
Why is it microsoft allowed to use the signature mozilla in their
internet explorer?
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)
Jens
Fup2 netscape.public.mozilla.license
Why not? Mozilla is Open, isn't it? I mean, i could see a problem
if MS lost
Holger Metzger wrote:
Am 24.12.2001 12:29 schrieb Jens Schlatter:
Why is it microsoft allowed to use the signature mozilla in their
internet explorer?
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)
This has mostly historical reasons back from the days when Mozilla
(Netscape
Jens Schlatter [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Why is it microsoft allowed to use the signature mozilla in their
internet explorer? Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)
It says Mozilla-_compatible_, not Mozilla itself.
