*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 02/10/2001 at 15:26 Ben Bucksch wrote:
Simon P. Lucy wrote:
On 22/09/2001 at 14:14 Simon P. Lucy wrote:
I'm going to try this one more time. A long while ago I suggested a
mechanism that would allow the multiple licencing of source files whilst
And a deafening silence is the result, not even a 'its rubbish go away'.
I don't believe it's necessary, because I (and, as I understand it, the
other staff, and anyone else who has ever implemented a dual licensing
scheme) do not agree with your interpretation of how dual licensing works.
Simon P. Lucy wrote:
Yes no one will ever see it unless they do a listing output, but that isn't the
point. As always the point is to unambiguously define the licence used.
But to whom define, if only you will ever see it? It will end up with
the current scheme: If you are sued, you claim
ARE YOU TIRED OF MAKING YOUR BOSS RICH?
Start your own business NOW! I will help you!
Become financially Independent using our proven system!
Learn to TRULY succeed working from HOME with your computer and phone
I CAN SHOW YOU AN OPPORTUNITY THAT IS NOTHING SHORT OF A MIRACLE.
Does that sound
