Space Riqui wrote:
--- Heikki Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after playing around for a while I managed to go to
a site I had set a petname for but the petname
field showed untrusted (I've been unable to
reproduce this, though)
This has happened to me a few times with the following web
Ian Grigg wrote:
2. This policy seems to have arisen alongside or
from a closed meeting of a month or so ago. Duane
(representing a CA of 2000 members) didn't get
invited to the closed meeting of CAs and browser
manufacturers. No minutes, no agenda, no published
results. There is only one
Customer demand. We have to support both browsers now.
Duane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Stokes wrote:
Thanks again for all of your help Duane. I'm going to go do some more
research on this. I can't use any of the technologies that you use due
to
our
Nelson,
Thanks for the info. I'm gonna go check out those Netscape reference docs
right away.
Nelson B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Stokes wrote:
I'm new to the Netscape/Firefox/Mozilla platform and I've been tasked
with
providing a programmatic method for
Ian Grigg wrote:
On the notion of common and consistent security
UI policy - how is that any different to follow the
leader ? It's synonymous as far as I can see it.
sigh
The implication of the phrase follow the leader is that we are just
doing what others are doing simply because they are
Ian Grigg wrote:
This is
clearly not the case - in partnership with the other browser vendors, we
are together working out the most appropriate UI and then all
implementing it.
This is news. Are you intending to announce this or
does it remain embargoed ? What is clear about it?
Who's in
