Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Windows Binaries

2000-01-08 Thread Greg Maxwell
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, Acy Stapp wrote: > I have lots of problems getting VTune to work on lame to gather > adequate profiling information, but would be happy to write > some assembly for FFT, etc. It may be possible to speed up > the quantize_xrpow even more with 3DNow or KNI. If you'd like, us po

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Windows Binaries

2000-01-08 Thread Acy Stapp
January, 2000 20:17 Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Windows Binaries > > From: "Ross Levis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Is there any chance of compiling a Windows version that takes advantage > > of MMX or 3DNow? > > Can you name a compiler which w

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Windows Binaries

2000-01-08 Thread Ross Levis
Mathew Hendry wrote: > Can you name a compiler which will do this on normal code, i.e. without the > use of MMX/3DNow-specific functions and macros or [inline] assembler? I'm afraid I can't. > Normally special-case code will be required to take advantage of these > enhanced instruction sets. I

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Windows Binaries

2000-01-07 Thread Mathew Hendry
> From: "Ross Levis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Is there any chance of compiling a Windows version that takes advantage > of MMX or 3DNow? Can you name a compiler which will do this on normal code, i.e. without the use of MMX/3DNow-specific functions and macros or [inline] assembler? Normally specia

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Windows Binaries

2000-01-07 Thread Ross Levis
Is there any chance of compiling a Windows version that takes advantage of MMX or 3DNow? Ross. Dmitry wrote: > :D . it was done with msvc++ 5.0 with optimization for pentium pro (i > have celeron 366 overclocked to 550) > > Best regards, > Dmitrymail to: [EMAIL PROT

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Windows Binaries

2000-01-07 Thread Mathew Hendry
> From: Pierre Darbon et Hurgon J.Sebastien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > I'm a newbie, and I wonder how the Windows binary found in the Russian > site (http://www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/index.htm) was compiled. > I supposed > it's done with Microsoft Visual C I think so. >, but I want to know if

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Windows Binaries

2000-01-07 Thread Dmitry
Hello Pierre, Friday, January 07, 2000, 6:51:27 PM, you wrote: PDeHJS> I'm a newbie, and I wonder how the Windows binary found in the Russian PDeHJS> site (http://www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/index.htm) was compiled. I supposed PDeHJS> it's done with Microsoft Visual C, but I want to know if it is opt

[MP3 ENCODER] Windows Binaries

2000-01-07 Thread Pierre Darbon et Hurgon J.Sebastien
Hello, I'm a newbie, and I wonder how the Windows binary found in the Russian site (http://www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/index.htm) was compiled. I supposed it's done with Microsoft Visual C, but I want to know if it is optimized for i586, i686 or anything else. I don't own MSVC myself, so I can't under