::
::
::I think this should be a seperate utility outside of lame? Most people
::encode from CDs, which usually are already correctly filtered for stuff
::below 20 Hz.
::
:: For pop music this is (mostly) true. I will test several CDs. Next week.
:: The psycho part I would
::
:: Question: When fs_in/fs_out is not representable by a:b with little a and b,
:: what do you like best:
::
:: [_] Lame rounds fs_in in a way, so fs_in/fs_out is representable by little a:b
:: [_] Lame have a function to resample exactly any ratio
:: [_] both,
::
:: Question: When fs_in/fs_out is not representable by a:b with little a and b,
:: what do you like best:
::
:: [_] Lame rounds fs_in in a way, so fs_in/fs_out is representable by little
a:b
:: [_] Lame have a function to resample exactly any ratio
:: [_]
:: As a value of 200 for BLACKSIZE showed an improvement in resampling, why
:: does is still got a value as low as 25?
::
Low pass, high pass and resampling code should be replaced by artefact-less
program code.
Which filters have artifacts?
low pass code is implemented with a very
As a value of 200 for BLACKSIZE showed an improvement in resampling, why
does is still got a value as low as 25?
Regards,
--
Gabriel Bouvigne - France
Hi Gabriel,
Increasing BLACKSIZE only improves the sharpness of the lowpass
cutoff. For resampling, I dont think we need an
Mark Taylor schrieb am Don, 28 Sep 2000:
I hope to add something soon which has it precompute the exact amount
needed. Does anyone have code which computes the lcd (largest
common denominator) of two ints? I think the number of windows needed
is given by:
:: As a value of 200 for BLACKSIZE showed an improvement in resampling, why
:: does is still got a value as low as 25?
::
Low pass, high pass and resampling code should be replaced by artefact-less
program code.
All three are currently done by code not being a LTI system, which results
in
::
::
::
:: As a value of 200 for BLACKSIZE showed an improvement in resampling, why
:: does is still got a value as low as 25?
::
::
:: Regards,
::
:: --
::
:: Gabriel Bouvigne - France
::
:: Hi Gabriel,
::
:: Increasing BLACKSIZE only improves the sharpness of
Oh, okay... Looks like I got in over my head... Hmm, recording a CD thru the line-in
seems to work fine for me... Oh well :-\
About the EQing, I think Greg misunderstood me... I use the EQ in the CD ripping
process, not in the MP3 decoding process. I use Winamp to play MP3s, I leave its EQ
Hi Mark,
you wrote on Wed, Oct 27 1999:
lame -b 128 -X5 -v -V 4 -h -k -d --resample 48 in.wav out48.mp3
The bug is that the error message "Error: resample code not yet
written!" was not being printed :-)
LOL! Thanks for the clarification.
I think the upsample to 48kHz at 320kbs because
Hi all,
just gave it a try:
lame -b 128 -X5 -v -V 4 -h -k -d --resample 48 in.wav out48.mp3
The .wav file was grabbed from an audio-CD (44.1 kHz). mp3 sounds
horrible, way too fast. Is this a feature or should the resampled file
sound like the original? The FhG resamples to 48 kHz
11 matches
Mail list logo
