Cavallo de Cavallis wrote:
>Mmm interesting, probably coz more guys are workin patchin and improving
it.
Yes but Tord is also not altering BladeEnc for quality -- only speed. He
makes sure that every update produces exactly the same MP3 file.
>and looking for somethin near 160 which settings
> I'm just a user, not a developer.
> I've heard a number of results from listening tests and all agree that LAME is better
> than BladeEnc at the same bitrate. I've also heard that LAME@128 sounds better than
> BladeEnc@160. Apart from speed optimizations, BladeEnc uses unmodified ISO code
> wh
I'm just a user, not a developer.
I've heard a number of results from listening tests and all agree that LAME is better
than BladeEnc at the same bitrate. I've also heard that LAME@128 sounds better than
BladeEnc@160. Apart from speed optimizations, BladeEnc uses unmodified ISO code
which is kno
