Phone: +61 (889) 279 898
FAX: +61 (889) 273 889
AudioPhilez (http://www.audiophilez.com)
- Original Message -
From: "Gabriel Bouvigne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Decoder quality compari
> > There is a Word document floating around, published by
> > Fraunhofer, called "MPEG Layer3 Bitstream syntax and decoding"
> > It is much more usefull to decoder writers than the ISO docs.
>
> Anybody have a copy of this? I'd love to see it.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
I'd also like a copy of a goo
>
> Howdy All,
>
> I recently finished completely overhauling the ISO 'dist10' LSF decoder to
> extract a layer-III only player for work. In the process, I discovered a
> few bugs/inconsistencies in/between the 'dist10' distribution and ISO/IEC
> 11172-3 and 13818-3. I don't know if they would
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 4:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [MP3 ENCODER] Decoder quality comparison [quite detailed -
> sorry if repeat]
...
> My first discovery was that out
Hi Matthew. Interesting analysis. Just one question.
What do you mean by
> WinAmp's EQ sucks bigtime. They all have the same frequency response.
Ross.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Hi peeps,
I know this is MP3-encoder but I couldn't find any place more suitable to
post the results of some decoder testing I've been doing over the last
couple of days.
I took a fairly complex track (Pat Metheny's Imaginary Day title track in
fact) ripped from CD at 44.1khz 16bit stereo, and e
