Thank you, Jeff and Bill,
I believe this survey topic should be discussed out of this mailing list. So,
I will create another mailing list to discuss on this. The mailing list will
include the members who are not involved in MPI Forum. So, if you want to join
the mailing list, just let me kn
I think it is a valid question in the context of a survey about MPI. It
is about the API they're calling. Other environments may choose to use
MPI in the implementation, but that's not part of their specification.
Could be anything.
On 12/7/2018 12:07 AM, Jeff Hammond via mpi-forum wrote:
P
I too found some of these questions impossible to answer because none of the
available answers was accurate enough, and I gave up rather than provide
misleading results.
I do think that this specific question is almost ok, but I really think that it
is better to address the requirements for not
Please stop perpetuating the myth that MPI and PGAS are opposed by asking
questions that support this false dichotomy.
Lots of folks use MPI via other APIs, whether they be PETSc or Global
Arrays. Thanks to MPI-3 RMA, PGAS can be just another abstraction layer on
top of MPI.
*Do you have any pla
