I know Prospect Park is the straw that stirs the drink, but I want to slowly
back away from that dispute into a more generalized NRP discussion.
Caveat: I know NRP Phase II is in jeopardy. I think there's a huge public
policy question about this that I hadn't realized until Michael's recent
posts
Don Jorovsky states:
The DFL-controlled Senate DID pass a plan to =20
balance the FY 2003 budget through June 30, 2003,
and they did it quickly (first two weeks of the new
legislative session).
[VH} Might we have the rest of the story?
What did the DFL-controlled Senate offer to cut in order
David is correct. Let's focus on the 2003 Minneapolis budget.
The handout that the City distributed at the Truth in Taxation hearing
eight weeks ago (see my 12/10/02 posts) showed $158,600,000 of revenue
coming from the State.
Last week, I read that the City is hoping to get $90 million for
List,
I can think of four great reasons to consolidate the police
communications department with the City communications department.
1. Organizational:
The Police think of themselves an independent organization -- separate
from the accountability and management of the City of Minneapolis.
This police communication issue is being portrayed as though there has not
ever been a communications person handling police media and that now there
will be one, resulting in a gag effect. But the truth is that the police
already do have media protocol - it is just within their own department.
Joe Barisonzi says:
4. Presenting a Lousy Image of Our City to Minnesota:
I know a sensational crime story in the urban core makes great copy to
lead the nightly news. The results are devastating for our
communities
-- in spirit and in tangible dollars. I hope that the coordinated
strategy will
In disagreement with Mr. Brauer I believe that
we need to review, and possibly repair, the problems
with the NRP prior to moving on to the mechanics of
Phase II. There is no way that the NRP is going
to repair itself without external pressure and
review.
I believe that the NRP wanted to
Keith says; I pointed out in the past that Teddy was bearish toward West
Broadway advancement. While he was directing the Met Council we gained no
heavy lifting of West Bro, the main commercial corridor of the Northwest
quadrant of Mpls. into the larger metro grid.
We garnered no high density
In a message dated 2/9/03 11:12:24 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Pardon my typo; I meant to clearly say:
We were never allowed a continuous MTC bus route. That is, one for
the full width of West Broadway/Broadway St. NE. Again, denying
job
access to Northsiders
My hometown of Portland Me just passed its antiwar resolution (on the 2nd
try). Another bustling urban center in Maine, Waterville (pop. 15,600), is
also considering the following resolution (it doesn't even tie in the war
with local concerns but addresses itself directly to foreign policy
Craig is right - and it's not limited to just the big dumpsters you find
around apartment buildings. I'm sure I'm not the only person who has taken
out their trash and discovered that neighbors or passersby have used their
90-gallon receptacle for storing the excess garbage that didn't fit into
In a message dated 2/8/2003 2:40:18 AM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This bill was written by the type of anti Minneapolis
republicans who probably lay awake nights thinking up new ways to get
even with the central cities. Little do they realize that their bill
I don't think we have anything to worry about. The Governor has already said he will not sign any bill reducing the rights of any group of citizens.
Karen Collier
Linden Hills
This bill was written by the type of anti Minneapolis
republicans who probably lay awake nights thinking up new ways
This bill will NOT preempt local ordinances, especially in charter cities
and cities of the first class (Mpls, St. Paul Duluth). But not only is
Karen correct about the governor's intention, Don Jorovsky is correct about
the inclination of the Senate to reject the bill. Can't make it. I'm not
T H E M I N N E A P O L I S O B S E R V E R
A Weekly Digest of All Things Minneapolitan
www.mplsobserver.com
Vol. 2, No. 26
February 3, 2003
To subscribe ($12/yr.), hit 'reply' and we'll set you up. Thanks.
**
THIS WEEK IN THE OBSERVER:
I appreciate Steve Cross's explanations and interpretations and want to add
my own for the handful of people likely left reading the thread and all its
geeky lawyer (i.e., myself) mumbo jumbo.
Let's talk bucks. Call them NRP Bucks, Nerpy Bucks if you will. Let's say
we get 1 million Nerpy Bucks
Gregory D. Luce wrote:
I agree with David Brauer and Steve Cross that the 52.5 percent is logically
interpreted as city-wide (or, more accurately, program wide), and I also
agree with David Brauer that neighborhoods who are poo pooing the percentage
requirements are shortsighted and hedging on
In watching Walgreen's current TV commercials, we are
given a glimpse of life in the town of Perfect. The
commercial goes on to claim because we live nowhere
near Perfect, it's good to have Walgreen's nearby.
Apparently, life is so perfect in Waterville, ME their
City Council has no legitimate
18 matches
Mail list logo