List,
After evaluating my remarks on the Riverview site, I agree with Keith Reitman.
They WERE snooty. I apologize to the list.
As a Northsider, I can appreciate Mike Hohmann's comments about investment in
the Northside and the implications. I hope that this will encourage some
In a message dated 9/27/02 1:21:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
List,
After evaluating my remarks on the Riverview site, I agree with Keith
Reitman.
They WERE snooty. I apologize to the list.
As a Northsider, I can appreciate Mike Hohmann's comments
Hello,
I was wondering if there has been any more discussion
and/or updates regarding the Riverview site?
Pamela Taylor
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
At 12:38 AM 11/17/01 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the matter of the Riverview Supper Club site, I believe it
arguable that having the housing development adjacent to the new
park site will serve park visitors well. As an example (you decide
how similar) I offer up Wirth Parkway. This
We get police reports every week in our Board packet and I have never
noticed that there is much activity out at Wirth Park. Maybe at the
parking lot by the chalet where cars might be broken into for stolen
purses, etc. However, compared to the cars parked around the Chain of
Lakes that get
In a message dated 11/17/01 10:29:29 AM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't go there very often, mostly because it's outside the areas
where I usually spend time. A couple summers ago, I took an extended
bike ride (alone) that included Wirth Park. It was a nice
Keith Reitman writes:
I invited polite rebuttal of my remarks below and got none. Most all I have
read regarding this issue on the List is the equivalent of flag waving to
me.
So I ask, please tell me how I err in my posting below?
I sez:
The error is not in the arguments, but in the
is reserved for those who, in times of
moral crisis, remain neutral --Dante
From: Jenny Heiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 18:46:12 -0600
To: Fran Guminga [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mpls. Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Riverview site
Fran
is reserved for those who, in times of
moral crisis, remain neutral --Dante
From: Jenny Heiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 18:46:12 -0600
To: Fran Guminga [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mpls. Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Riverview site
Fran
I invited polite rebuttal of my remarks below and got none. Most all I have
read regarding this issue on the List is the equivalent of flag waving to me.
So I ask, please tell me how I err in my posting below? Fran, Dean, other
naturalists?
Fran --
Thank you.
You have passionately yet eloquently stated the exact reasons why this
parcel of land MUST be saved for usage by not just residents of Mpls.
but by visitors to our city both regionally, nationally, and
internationally. Our politicians must take the blinders off and
understand
Along with the other sound arguments made for preserving the Riverview site as a park, think of the educational value it provides as an urban river experience as well as the connection to other significant parks such as the North Mississippi Regional Park, Edgewater and Boom Island.
From MCNC's
In a message dated 11/14/01 5:17:34 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While I very much appreciate that people are upset over the process involved
at the Z P meeting. While I appreciate that many hours have been spent by
many people to design a comprehensive plan for
Whitney Clark, Director of Friends of the Mississippi River, gave me
permission to post his comments regarding the reasons why we need to
preserve the Riverview Site for open/green space:
* Loss of open space will hurt the viability of other planned
developments in the area. TheUpper River
14 matches
Mail list logo
