20,000 X 4k = 80,000k Given that not all 4k of a
buffer is available for message data - would it not
take more like 29,000 buffers for a 100meg message ???
This is assuming 3,600 bytes available per buffer for
messageing.
--- Ronald Weinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering each buffer is
Didi,
You'll have to share the cost information, more
detail about applications that you run and the
messaging volume trends at your shop if you want a
'real world' answer. Some questions...
Why did you not convert to MQ v5.2 for os/390 2.10?
MQ 5.3.1 will run on os/390 2.10 - did you know?
In
Carol,
It will take you around 30,000 4k buffers for each
100 meg message that you intend to have memory
resident.
100*1048576/3600=29127 rounded or,
room for 9 100meg messages, per gig of memory.
You'll want to turn on SMF115 records, uses not so
much disk and the performance hit is arounf
are sized at about 2Gb per QM so
they should be big
enough. We don't have very large volumes or message
sizes going through
the system.
Kulbir.
Christopher Warneke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
18-Nov-2004 06:47
Please respond to MQSeries List
[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Christopher Warneke
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backing up Q files but not the LOG
files
Kulbir,
Sounds like what you really need
Build a 2nd qmgr, tune it for the batch processing,
route the messages to it from the 1st.
The isolation will make it easier to tune both
logging and psid storage requirements. You've got
plenty of bufferpools, psids if you're at v5.3.
Maybe even route the batch directly to a dedicated
Let me be the first to suggest upgrading to MQ v5.3.
:-)
--- Jeff A Tressler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have been running MQSeries v5.1 on HP-UX 11.0 for
many years. Recently we have upgraded machines and
set them up in a failover configuration.
These new machines are runnng HP-UX 11.11 and
What I don't understand here, is the purpose of the
replication. Are we trying to retain backups of the
qmgr's objects, or both the objects and the messages?
If you are only trying to retain copies of the
objects...
of data we replicate, hence the
reason why we're
contemplating on replicating just the Q files and
not LOG files.
Cheers.
Christopher Warneke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
17-Nov-2004 20:26
Please respond to MQSeries List
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Set expiry to the maximum level, not unlimited(or
something reasonable for your purposes).
See how many tenths-of-a-second have been decremented,
since the message was put to a queue. Subtract that
from put time, if you need it as a time value - you'll
have to code the process. This would give
Jeff,
Set expiry to the maximum level, not unlimited(or
something reasonable for your purposes).
See how many tenths-of-a-second have been decremented,
from the MQMD Expiry bucket,
since the message was put to a queue. Subtract that
from put time, if you need it as a time value - you'll
have to
Given that the expiry field is decremented at points
along the path of transmission...
The value is decremented to reflect the time the
message spends on the destination
queue, and also on any intermediate transmission
queues if the put is to a remote
queue. It may also be decremented by message
Omegamon XE DE and QPasa are your best of breed
products.
If you have Candle (aka Tivoli) Omegamon inhouse, you
can integrate CICS, MVS and distributed platforms
easily.
If you do not already use Candle/Tivoli (IBM bought
Candle 4/1/04 and is rebranding it as Tivoli), take a
loke at MQSoftware's
Does the MQ Explorer connect to this qmgr? Try
connecting with the MQ Client, to see if your qmgr is
good. Maybe from a remote machine.
--- Tad Perillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi T.Rob,
Thanks for the reply. This is a local connection.
Here are snippets form
both Perl modules that are
Playboy
--- Roger Lacroix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
All,
Ok, this is a strange question, but what magazines,
journals, etc.. do MQ Admins
read? I got asked that questions and I couldn't come
up with a answer. (I tend
to read developer / architect type magazines rather
than admin stuff.
See if [EMAIL PROTECTED] will respond to your
request. Greg had done a lot of really good work with
python; connecting to windows, unix and z/os qmgrs -
he understood this in great depth.
--- Meekin, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to write a Perl program to do an inquire
How is the Oracle db connect authorized? To what
user? Is it possible that the bind to Oracle is
hosing your auth for the MQ access? When you run the
app and it's failing, what does the system tell you
about the ownership of the process?
--- Driscoll Tom - Princeton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I
At the same time, I've seen clients with both copies
on the same disk! On an IBM project '97-'00, where
the messaging was all nonpersistent and it was MQ
v2.1, we used single logging for performance reasons.
Only time that I've seen it done.
--- Jim Nuckolls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of the
How did you set the MAXMSGL on a clntconn/svrconn
pair? MQCONNX? Read up on the MQCNO, MQCD, and MQSCO
structures in the IBM manuals.
--- Jim Nuckolls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you define a channel and take the default it is
4,194,304.
That is true for both sender and receiver. However,
too long. I can only read upto 2 pages ;-)
Please respond to the person directly not the list
server.
Christopher
Warneke
christopher_g_wa
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Is dual logging/dual archiving not enough for you?
Put your bsds on different packs and active logs on
different packs.
Make sure that you've set the archive retention period
in your ZPARM for a long enough duration.
And if you have the time, look for MS15... at the
supportpack site. You'll need
What do you use for administration tools?
--- MQ Mailbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have several JAVA client applications running in
our production
environment. Every once in awhile I receive a MQ
event for 2085,
unknown object, with the object name as blank and
the application as
Roll back to CSD05 - if it still works, open a pmr
with IBM.
--- Bharath Ram Srinivasan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks,
We use a HA clustered system across 2 machines M1
M2 in Solaris. We were
at MQSI CSD Level 2 and WMQ 5.3 CSD 6.
Yesterday, we upgraded our MQSI to MQSI CSD 6. We
try
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=203q1=mA1Juid=swg24000673loc=en_UScs=utf-8lang=en
--- Alex A. L. Sousa - BMS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to find the tool saveqmgr to
AIX / Mqseries 5.3.
I'd like to know where it can be download.
Best regards
Alex
Adiraju,
What kind of machine is at the other end of the
channel? Could this be an adoptmca issue? Why not
have a failover script cycle the channel when it
fails? It could interogate the primary ip and
secondary ip when the channel has a retry event
trigger it. Then make a failover or alert
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Warneke
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 April 2004 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Channel Connection name resolution
Adiraju,
What kind of machine is at the other end of the
channel? Could this be an
adoptmca issue? Why
Here is the link to the support pack IA0T for SWIFT
messaging
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/integration/support/supportpacs/individual/ia0t.html
Good luck,
Chris
--- Juni Per [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any standard message sets available for
SWIFT.
Does it come with the WMQI 2.1 s/w
There should be a support pack for that.
Take a look at IBM's site.
--- Juni Per [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any standard message sets available for
SWIFT.
Does it come with the WMQI 2.1 s/w or do any of you
have the original messgae set or a link to it or the
mrp file?
Robert,
Try this support pack...
MO60: MQSeries for AIX - Message browser
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=203uid=swg24000125loc=en_UScs=utf-8lang=en
There is a source file that you can download.
Good luck,
Chris
--- Robert Broderick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I looked on MQSeries.net
What platform are you trying to determine this on?
The m/f logs will tell you what was accessed and when,
as will racf if you audit security. Maybe the smf
type126 records will have info that you can use.
look at support pack mo12 to review the logs.
Chris
--- Adiraju, Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WS,
If both channel names are the same, and the receiver
is on a mainframe qmgr - the ADOPTMCA ALL option will
allow multiple iterations of the same channel.
If ADOPTMCA QMGR is used, and the 2 spoke qmgrs have
the same name, and the channels are named the same -
it will also work. I've done
Bill,
Why not trigger the get application, allow it to
perform mqgets with a tuned timeout, say 5-10 secs. -
all the while doing mqput1s per inbound message? Will
this application ever do a put without an input from a
get? Are there any unit of work considerations?
Chris
--- Bill Anderson
Harkishin,
Candle does the Tandem MQSeries code work for IBM.
Dave Mazza ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) may be able to
locate a resource for your questions - should no one
answer them on the listserver.
Good luck,
Chris
--- Harkishin Thadani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Friends,
I am looking for some
Krishan
There is a book - Advanced Messaging Applications with
MSMQ and MQSeries by Rhys Lewis : ISBN.0-7897-2023-X.
This will give you some ammunition.
Chris
--- Mike Kenny - CPX Mngd Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I know
MSMQ supports amximum message size of 4Mb
MQ Series is not
The support packs are good, there is also a CBT CD-ROM
from IBM - MQ84 Intro to MQSeries - that you can order
for $300.
I'll find the URL if you are interested.
Chris
--- Dawson, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mark,
Try these two supportpacs:
35 matches
Mail list logo
