and look into it.
bobbee
From: Heggie, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WBIMB SNMP
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:41:51 -0400
Tivoli has a command line API called wpostemsg, which sends alerts
Tivoli has a command line API called wpostemsg, which sends alerts to
the Tivoli console. I use it on Windows and AIX. It is nicer than the
delivered Tivoli Distributed Monitoring product which can issue cryptic
messages.
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
My thanks to Bill who has come up with this checklist. It has helped me
many times.
Lots of hidden hassles in Windows. I had the same problem myself a few
months ago, and with the help of folks on this list I developed the
following checklist. Let me know if it works for you, and if there is
Make sure they are running the command server and that you have SYSTEM.ADMIN.SVRCONN
defined.
Peter Heggie
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe H. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 2:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Terminal
I think its on mqseries.net
Peter Heggie
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Awerbuch
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 2:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mqseries pick-up lines
Hey all,
I remember reading or receiving a collection of
Amqmdain - don't know what it stands for, but it is used to not only
start services, but to specify that they are to start automatically when
a queue manager starts, as well as starting these things under the MQ
userid, and other things.
Peter Heggie
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries
I want to run a script to automatically archive old MQ logs, based on
the rcdmqimg commands and the messages it issues.
I have implemented this script as a Custom Service, to start after the
queue manager starts. This is working fine, but does anyone see problems
with this approach? I want to
demonstrated it to me. Since this
is not happening in other interfaces, I assume it has
something to do with the app. Have you been aware of
this ? If so, what was the problem?
Thanks,
Ruzi
--- Heggie, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Ruzi,
We are going to increase MAXHANDS for now. I
|-+
| | Heggie, Peter |
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | NGRID.COM |
| | Sent by: MQSeries|
| | List |
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED
as opposed to connections. It suggests the app is making a new
connection for each message and not releasing them. Have you checked
for
that?
Alternatively, what kind of logging are you using and are all the
messages
in a single unit of work?
-- T.Rob
-Original Message-
From: Heggie, Peter
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JMS resource problems after 254 'connections' ?
Hi Peter,
We had the same problem with PeopleSoft/JMS. We
increased MAXHANDS to 512 about a year ago, and we
have never had this problem again since then.
Ruzi
--- Heggie, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More information
Has anyone encountered a problem with a MQ to JMS environment, where a
synchronous transfer (request/reply) encounters a 'Resouce Exception'
after 245 reply messages are processed?
We have an MQ to PeopleSoft environment where we send messages from an
MQ application via JMS to the PeopleSoft
Title: Message
The 2 notation redirects stderr, while
redirects stdout so Im guessing that the output is sent to stderr.
We have a command script with this:
runmqtrm -m $1 -q $1.INIT.QUEUE
/home/mqm/log/mqtrigmon.initq.log 21
This sends stdout to
through, then you would have lost one trigger message.
Apart from that both are same.
Cheers
Rao
From: Heggie,
Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4 March 2004 2:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MQ Triggering in CICS
Is there a way to dynamically set the
userid? As long
]
Subject: Re: MQ Triggering in CICS
-Original Message-
From: Heggie, Peter
Is there a way to dynamically set the userid? As long as we are creating
a
SIL in CICS, is there a way for the SIL to specify the userid when
issuing
the EXEC CICS START ?
==
Yes; specify the USERID
lost one trigger message.
Apart from that both are same.
Cheers
Rao
From: Heggie,
Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4 March 2004 2:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MQ Triggering in CICS
Is there a way to dynamically set the
userid? As long as we are creating a SIL
Did he run the MQ Client install? Usually its just mqax200.dll that is
needed. The client install registers the mqax200.dll, and it is then
available in the VB Project References list.
Peter Heggie
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Beinert,
as though the installation isn't complete as
the .dll should be in the bin directory of the MQ directory.
HTH
Dave Kazatsky
Senior Middleware Administrator
W. (908) 575-6947
C. (973) 865-8106
Heggie, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
MQ Visual Edit - you can de-select the Convert option on its Open Queue
screen.
Peter Heggie
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas, Don
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 11:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Queue Browsing and data
And you might want to add a trigger monitor startup:
runmqtrm -m $1 -q $1.INIT.QUEUE /home/mqm/log/mqtrigmon.log 21
Where $1 is the queue manager.
Peter Heggie
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger
Lacroix
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Heggie,
Peter
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 3:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Websphere Technical Exchange?
Thank you, that is helpful information, in many ways.
Peter Heggie
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WR
Having some confusion as to the source of a problem. We have MQ
connecting to PeopleSoft via JMS (JMS Listening Connector). We send an
XML message, and expect one back, but the reply is not XML. We do,
however, get a reply. This tells me that PeopleSoft Integration Broker
is correctly reading the
Thank you, that is helpful information, in many ways.
Peter Heggie
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WR
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Websphere Technical Exchange?
At 10:07 AM 2/12/2004, Heggie
Or START the Cobol program with the message Id as the parameter, and
each instance of the Cobol program is going after only one message. This
means modifying the Cobol program to do a MQGET with a matching MsgID.
Peter Heggie
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL
Is it XP Pro or XP Home? Pro is supported.
Peter Heggie
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kerry
Swemmer
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 8:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MQSeries 5.3 on XP
Hi All,
I am trying to install 5.3 on
Title: Message
This
may not apply, but we had a similar problem about two years ago (with the XML
tag arrow characters) and we changed the mainframe CCSID to 500 from
37.
Peter Heggie
-Original Message-From: MQSeries List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ward, Mike
SSent:
We implemented a lower KeepAlive value, both on our MQ server AIX
machine and on our PeopleSoft web server machines (where 95% of our
svrconn connections are coming from), and that significantly lowered the
number of connections. The web server is WebLogic 6.1, MQ is v5.3.
Peter Heggie
Last night I made the change to include TCP: KeepAlive=Yes and CHANNELS:
AdoptNewMCA=ALL/Check=QM,ADDRESS,NAME and recycled the Queue Manager..
(FYI the manual says you can use 'ALL' for the AdoptNewMCACheck parm,
but MQ does not like it). These parameters were not used previously.
This morning I
I don't know what that interval is.. I'll have to ask a sysadmin. Its
probably the default for AIX.
Peter Heggie
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christopher Frank
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Thanks.. At least I've got it set for the regular channels..
Peter Heggie
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill
Anderson
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More on 'orphaned' SVRCONN connections
Chris
But the real user could be some loser that defines the ID mqm on their
machine, logs on with that ID, and then your QM has no choice but to let
him do whatever they want!
-Original Message-
From: Heggie, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 12:10 PM
To: [EMAIL
://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/9445fa5b416f6e32852569ae006
bb65f/3effa2807d4b649e85256b750055b5f7?OpenDocument
Ernest Roberts
IT - Sr Sys Prog
MBUSA, LLC
- Forwarded by Ernest Roberts/171/DCAG/DCX on 01/07/2004 03:40 PM
-
Heggie, Peter
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Heggie, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Puzzled: MQJE001, MQRC 2102 for non-mqm users
Thanks.. I see there is a redbook on Implementing MQ security from May
Here is an excerpt from the doc (Clients/Chapter 7)
Access control in WebSphere MQ is based upon the user identifier
associated
with the process making MQI calls. For WebSphere MQ clients, the process
that
issues the MQI calls is the server-connection MCA. The user identifiers
used
by the
would you trust
some types of client and not others?
-- T.Rob
-Original Message-
From: Heggie, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 11:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Puzzled: MQJE001, MQRC 2102 for non-mqm users
Here is an excerpt from the doc (Clients
whatever they want!
-Original Message-
From: Heggie, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 12:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Puzzled: MQJE001, MQRC 2102 for non-mqm users
I'm sorry - I took the documentation to mean that for non-Java clients
can now pay the check, leave the tip and go home.
Thanks Peter!!
bee-oh-dubble-bee-dubble-egh
From: Heggie, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tivoli Monitoring
Date
This is from the Tivoli for MQ monitors help -
For monitors which monitor resources and determine numeric charac-
teristics:
never
Monitor does not trigger a response.
Greater than
Triggers if the current resource value is greater than the
specified
We have Tivoli on the distributed side and home-grown on the mainframe
side. The mainframe is not Tivoli because we were not ready with
required system software at the time (NetView was wrong version).
I think it is easy to write home-grown monitors, as you have pointed
out. It really depends on
I'm looking into the security / access aspects of using MQ Explorer for
remote administration.
In the System Administration Guide, under Using Snap-Ins to administrate
Websphere MQ, Setting up the Websphere MQ Explorer, it says if the
MCAUSER is blank, it is possible for a malicious application
Message-
From: Heggie, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 10:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MCAUSER - conflicting descriptions?
I'm looking into the security / access aspects of using MQ Explorer for
remote administration.
In the System Administration Guide, under
in another email, this is only a partial solution but may be good
enough for your needs or may get you started on writing your own exit.
-- T.Rob
-Original Message-
From: Heggie, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MQExplorer
on
the these channel types is nothing at all.
That is, the authority taken by the MCA is that which started the MCA.
The MCAUSER field is ignored. IBM will be changing the documentation...
Phil
|-+
| | Heggie, Peter
Can you have a 'shutdown' command that runs a program to send a report
message to the app? With a feedback code of MQFB_QUIT ? The app /
service would have to be modified to look for this type of message and
feedback code.
Peter Heggie
(315) 428 - 3193
-Original Message-
From: Steve D.
: MQGet Blocked Read
Nice Peter
It cold use that feedback code of 65876 (Application Quit).
bb
From: Heggie, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MQGet Blocked Read
Date
Reasoning
super hero!!! Oh sorry, he has already spoken!!! (sorry I couldn't
resist!!)
bobbee
From: Heggie, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Design Review - custom trigger monitor vs triggered
program
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003
If you have the luxury of rebooting, turn off IBM Websphere MQ services
in the Services console, set it to Manual, then reboot. MQ will not be
running and any performance tools will not be monitoring MQ executables.
Peter Heggie
(315) 428 - 3193
-Original Message-
From: Potkay, Peter M
Hello all - would appreciate your responses on this one.
We have someone who wants to use a custom trigger monitor to both read
the init queue message and process the application queue message. It
would be a long running process, on AIX, that waits forever (loops) on
the init queue. When a
messages for other queues.
It might be more efficient since MQ doesn't have to load a program to
process the queues, but depends upon how frequently it gets scheduled.
I assume it's TRIGGER FIRST.
Phil
Heggie, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
[EMAIL
initiation queues?
Stefan
From: Heggie, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Design Review - custom trigger monitor vs triggered
program
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 13:01:11 -0400
Hi Phil.. I'm buried in ERP implementation.
Thanks
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Design Review - custom trigger monitor vs triggered program
Peter,
what is your design rationale for having multiple initiation queues?
Stefan
From: Heggie, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Design Review
This is one of the best ways to debug a trigger problem. Instead of
starting the trigger monitor using the GUI, or as a background process,
start it in a new DOS window by entering runmqtrm -m qmgrname -q
initqueuename. All the output from the monitor will be displayed in the
DOS window. Test your
On z/os - I have a rexx, running in batch under IKJEFT01, that allocates
SYSIN, SYSPRINT and CMDIN, builds a command in CMDIN, redirects command
input to CMDIN and then performs a TSO CALL to 'libname(CSQUTIL)'
'qmgr'.
It worked in v2.1; it blows up in v5.3 with a system 5C6.
The actual
I found the problem - I needed an additional STEPLIB concatenation.
Still have to account for the new message formats..
Peter Heggie
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it, are confidential to National Grid and
are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
Title: Message
We are getting errors on a
channel retry, which happens on QMGR startup. It connects two os/390 lpars.
Both qmgrs are recycled in the
early morning around the same time, so it is natural that often one side is not
ready for the other side to connect. That is when the channel
Title: Message
dcomcnfg is a 'hidden' utility that is accessible from a command line or
RUN command. On the Windows 2000 PC do a START / RUN command. At the prompt for
a program, enter dcomcnfg.exe
This
will bring up a little GUI application. Scroll down until you see IBM MQSeries
Some day, someone is going to post a copy of an API Crossing exit...
Then you can roll your own.. After upgrading to 5.3..
Peter Heggie
(315) 428 - 3193
-Original Message-
From: Anderson, Lizette T. (RyTull)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 3:29 PM
To: [EMAIL
Thanks Gary.. That's the definitive list!
Peter Heggie
(315) 428 - 3193
-Original Message-
From: Gary Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MQ software evolution - fill in the gaps?
I'm pretty sure this is the order...
Can someone help fill in the gaps or correct my note below? I'm trying
to establish a timeline and show the names of the various MQ software
names and dates.
MQ: MQM (199? - 199?) - MQSeries (199? - 2001) - Websphere MQ (2001 -
present)
MQSI: MQSI (199? - 2000) - WMQI (2000 - 2002) - WMQIB (2002
because you are using a proprietary
protocol (MQ) rather than an open internet standard
protocol (http). Views anyone ?
mqm
--- Heggie, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It lacks a bunch of things..
XML over HTTP - when you don't care enough to send
the very best..
-Original Message
It lacks a bunch of things..
XML over HTTP - when you don't care enough to send the very best..
-Original Message-
From: Jason Cornell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: XML over HTTP and MQ
HTTP lacks WMQ's assured
61 matches
Mail list logo
