Re: RUNMQLSR

2004-09-29 Thread John Scott
You can issue the word start infront, as in: start runmqlsr -t tcp -p 1441 -m QMgrName Which will start the listener in another popup window. However, if you logoff, this popup windows will get closed, as will the listener. You need to either use the MMC snapin to create a listener, or use

Re: RUNMQLSR

2004-09-29 Thread Roger Lacroix
to automate the process of creating a QueueManager and configuring it the way we want. In the process i also have to create a server connection channel and a listener for the Queue Manager. I read the MQ System Administration document and as per the document i should be using, runmqlsr -t tcp -p

Re: RUNMQLSR

2004-09-29 Thread Usha Suryadevara
and a listener for the Queue Manager. I read the MQ System Administration document and as per the document i should be using, runmqlsr -t tcp -p 1441 -m QmgrName .. assuming i want a tcp type communication and i want the Queue Manager to listen at 1441. When i execute the above command (windows

Re: RUNMQLSR : What happens...

2004-08-11 Thread Paul Clarke
] cc N.AC.AT Subject RUNMQLSR : What happens... 10/08/2004 21:42 Please respond to Tony Boggis ...to established connections when

RUNMQLSR : What happens...

2004-08-10 Thread Tony Boggis
...to established connections when a runmqlsr process is terminated? I don't have easy access to a running environment at the moment so I am posing this question. If I have a cluster of queue managers with active CLUSSDR/CLUSRCVR channels, what happens to those channels if the runmqlsr process

runmqlsr - 5 instances running ?

2004-06-22 Thread Benjamin F. Zhou
Hi, I'm replacing amqcrsta with runmqlsr. According to the insight I got from the Vegas conference, and a FAQ from IBM: ..., a SINGLE listener can now handle an unbounded number of connections... However, whenever I start runmqlsr, a ps -aef | grep runmqlsr shows five instances of it running

Re: runmqlsr - 5 instances running ?

2004-06-22 Thread David C. Partridge
Depending on the platform what you may be seeing is all the active threads in the one listener process (with I think three active connections in this case). Do the PPID values all go back to the same runmqlsr process? If so then that would suggest that this is the case. What release of MQ

Re: runmqlsr - 5 instances running ?

2004-06-22 Thread Benjamin F. Zhou
: BUSA.COMSubject: runmqlsr - 5 instances running ? Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] en.AC.AT 06/22/2004 07:48 AM Please

Re: runmqlsr vs. MQSC START LISTENER on Windows ??

2004-03-30 Thread Heggie, Peter
List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark D. Hansen Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: runmqlsr vs. MQSC START LISTENER on Windows ?? Thanks. Out of curiosity, why does Windows have this separate set of amqmdain commands? What does amqdain stand

runmqlsr vs. MQSC START LISTENER on Windows ??

2004-03-29 Thread Mark D. Hansen
Can anyone tell me the difference between using runmqlsr and the MSQC START LISTENER command on Windows? I'm having trouble with runmqlsr hanging when used in the following batch file to setup my QM ... endmqm -w QM_eai_client endmqlsr -w -m QM_eai_client dltmqm QM_eai_client crtmqm -c

Re: runmqlsr vs. MQSC START LISTENER on Windows ??

2004-03-29 Thread Herd, Stewart
-Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark D. Hansen Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 1:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: runmqlsr vs. MQSC START LISTENER on Windows ?? Can anyone tell me the difference between using runmqlsr

Re: runmqlsr vs. MQSC START LISTENER on Windows ??

2004-03-29 Thread Tim Armstrong
Gidday Mark, Just curious why are you deleting and recreating the queue manager? Regards Tim A -Original Message- From: Mark D. Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 30 March 2004 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: runmqlsr vs. MQSC START LISTENER on Windows ?? Can

Re: runmqlsr vs. MQSC START LISTENER on Windows ??

2004-03-29 Thread Chan, Ian M
Hi Mark, I don't know the difference between these two (I believe they are the same except the parameters may be different) but you have to run the runmqlsr in another window by issuing START runmqlsr -t TCP -m xxx. On the other hand, you can use amqmdain to start the qmgr through MQ services

Re: runmqlsr vs. MQSC START LISTENER on Windows ??

2004-03-29 Thread Mark D. Hansen
7:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: runmqlsr vs. MQSC START LISTENER on Windows ?? Gidday Mark, Just curious why are you deleting and recreating the queue manager? Regards Tim A -Original Message- From: Mark D. Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 30

Re: runmqlsr -i vs BlockIP

2004-02-24 Thread Robert Broderick
That was Korn-ie!! From: David C. Partridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: runmqlsr -i vs BlockIP Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:46:14 - So we get perls of wisdom :-) -Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: runmqlsr

2004-02-21 Thread Darren Douch
Message - From: Meekin, Paul To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 10:03 AM Subject: Re: runmqlsr Another option is to issue the START LISTENER command from runmqsc etc., although this has the limitation thatlisteners can only use the default port 1414

Re: runmqlsr

2004-02-21 Thread John Scott
. Regards John Scott IBM Certified Specialist - MQSeries Argos Ltd -Original Message-From: Meekin, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 February 2004 10:04To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: runmqlsr Another option is to issue the START LISTENER command from runmqsc etc., although this has

Re: runmqlsr

2004-02-20 Thread Meekin, Paul
PROTECTED]Sent: 19 February 2004 19:46To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: runmqlsr On AIX, is there some setting to make runmqlsr start with the queue manager (in the same way that the channel initiator does), or does it need to be started with it via a startup script? Had a look through

Re: runmqlsr -i vs BlockIP

2004-02-20 Thread Wyatt, T. Rob
I'm actually a very clever script. -Original Message- From: Chan, Ian M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 12:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: runmqlsr -i vs BlockIP Ah! I misunderstood from the descriptionso the BlockIP exit is still required. BTW, do

Re: runmqlsr -i vs BlockIP

2004-02-20 Thread David C. Partridge
So we get perls of wisdom :-) -Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wyatt, T. Rob Sent: 20 February 2004 14:01 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: runmqlsr -i vs BlockIP I'm actually a very clever script. Instructions for managing your mailing list

Re: runmqlsr

2004-02-19 Thread Siegman, Polly
Set up the listener to run from inetd. You will need to have root authority to set this up initially. I copied the below information from the Quick Beginnings Manual for 5.2. You will not see runmqlsr as a running process but should see amqcrsta running. http://www-306.ibm.com/software

runmqlsr -i vs BlockIP

2004-02-19 Thread Chan, Ian M
Hi, With the new parameter -i which can specify the IP address to listen on, is it enough to replace the BlockIP exit program? I know BlockIP offers more including multiple IP addresses and filter userids, however, I think the new parameter together with the MCAUSER should be enough for internal

Re: runmqlsr -i vs BlockIP

2004-02-19 Thread Wyatt, T. Rob
Ian, The -i parameter lets you bind the listener to a specific IP address on the server, not a specific IP address of the remote node. This is similar to the LOCLADDR parameter on a channel definition. BlockIP is completely different and neither the runmqlsr -i parameter nor the LOCLADDR

Re: runmqlsr -i vs BlockIP

2004-02-19 Thread Chan, Ian M
, T. Rob Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 3:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: runmqlsr -i vs BlockIP Ian, The -i parameter lets you bind the listener to a specific IP address on the server, not a specific IP address of the remote node. This is similar to the LOCLADDR parameter on a channel

Re: SWOT Analysis with listeners as inetd or runmqlsr AND channels as threads or processes

2003-03-17 Thread Robert Broderick
I have heard that the RUNMQLSR has been much improved for 5.3 so it is SUPPOSEDLY as good asd INETD over 500 connections. This statement is not from experience or anyone else who has experience with it. bobbee From: Tim Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply

Re: SWOT Analysis with listeners as inetd or runmqlsr AND channel s as threads or processes

2003-03-17 Thread John Scott
I've experienced a couple of problems with inetd on AIX. As a result we've switched over to using runmqlsr. It did have some memory leaks but since CSD04/05 it works fine. I particularly found problems if you attempted to stop a queue manager when using inetd. Inetd would still accept incoming

Re: SWOT Analysis with listeners as inetd or runmqlsr AND channel s as threads or processes

2003-03-17 Thread Robert Broderick
PROTECTED] Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SWOT Analysis with listeners as inetd or runmqlsr AND channel s as threads or processes Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:11:11 - I've experienced a couple of problems with inetd on AIX. As a result we've

Re: SWOT Analysis with listeners as inetd or runmqlsr AND channels as threads or processes

2003-03-16 Thread Tim Armstrong
Inetd for more than a couple of hundred connections is usually more reliable. Runmqlsr and threads uses less resources. As for your second question its determined by which type of listener you use. To quote from the manual. You can use inetd or the Run Listener (RUNMQLSR) command to define a TCP

SWOT Analysis with listeners as inetd or runmqlsr AND channels as threads or processes

2003-03-14 Thread Stephan C. Moen
MQSeries Experts, I am inquiring from the vast array of knowledge within the MQSeries community on two simple topics. Please respond to the strengths and weaknesses of the following. 1) Choice of listener: inetd or runmqlsr process. 2) Choice of channel: start as a thread or process

Old School RUNMQLSR

2003-01-16 Thread Mike Davidson
I've always started my MQ listeners (on Windows) via the command prompt - mainly b/c I learned on version 5.0. I recently upgraded this W2K machine to WMQ 5.3 and I continue to start the listeners this way - however, I'm noticing something different now. With previous versions, the listener

Re: Old School RUNMQLSR

2003-01-16 Thread Peter Heggie
You do get 'channel started' messages in the W2K event log.. From: Mike Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/16/2003 08:14 AM Please respond to MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Old School RUNMQLSR I've always started my MQ listeners (on Windows) via

Re: Old School RUNMQLSR

2003-01-16 Thread Mike Davidson
by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/16/2003 08:44 AM Please respond to MQSeries List To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Old School RUNMQLSR You do get 'channel started' messages in the W2K event log.. From: Mike Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/16/2003 08:14 AM

Re: Old School RUNMQLSR

2003-01-16 Thread Paul Clarke
I've always started my MQ listeners (on Windows) via the command prompt - mainly b/c I learned on version 5.0. I recently upgraded this W2K machine to WMQ 5.3 and I continue to start the listeners this way - however, I'm noticing something different now. With previous versions, the listener window

Re: Old School RUNMQLSR

2003-01-16 Thread Mike Davidson
Thanks, Paul. Mike Davidson TSYS MQSeries Tech Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/16/2003 11:15 AM Please respond to MQSeries List To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Old School RUNMQLSR I've

Re: Old School RUNMQLSR

2003-01-16 Thread David C. Partridge
Paul, Does this (channel pools) also apply to the other 5.3 distributed platforms? Dave Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Re: Old School RUNMQLSR

2003-01-16 Thread Paul Clarke
Paul, Does this (channel pools) also apply to the other 5.3 distributed platforms? Dave Yes, it applies to all 5.3 distributed platforms (not z/OS clearly). Cheers, P. Paul G Clarke WebSphere MQ Development IBM Hursley Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in

Re: AIX runmqlsr problem

2002-09-05 Thread Pavel Tolkachev
: Sent by: MQSeriesSubject: AIX runmqlsr problem List MQSERIES@AKH-Wie n.AC.AT 09/04/2002 06:01 PM Please respond to MQSeries

Re: AIX runmqlsr problem

2002-09-04 Thread Warren
have the same config in my testing environment and the everything runs just fine. Env. AIX, MQS 5.2, DB2 7.2, WMQSI2.1, WF3.3.2 I trying to start the listner for the WF. runmqlsr -t tcp -p 5010 -m FMCQM and after a while it comes back with.. AMQ9218: The TCP/IP listener program could not bind

Re: AIX runmqlsr problem

2002-09-04 Thread Erik Klemetti
it when I type ps -ef | grep runmqlsr. It seems to be the FMCQM listner but I can't se on which port.. Utterly confused.. Please advice Erik From: Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AIX runmqlsr problem Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 15:24:35