On 04/05/2011 09:14 AM, Eric Decker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know what Read-Modify-Write means. At least in the context of non-TI
> processors. :-)
> I've designed and debugged full blown multiprocessors with nasty snooping
> caches.
> cache coherency is always entertaining.
>
> Now in the DMA machine
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2007-12-13, Grant Edwards wrote:
Can anybody provide a hint on who to talk to about signing an
NDA and getting access to the sources that would be required
to add support for new devices to msp430-gdbproxy?
Is msp430-gdbproxy development dead?
I've got a
Oleg Verych wrote:
* 2004-12-09, Geoffrey Brown:
I downloaded code composer essentials. It appears to be eclipse + gcc
+gdb. Anybody know if the
gcc and gdb ports are related to those on the mspgcc sourceforge page ?
Also, it doesn't appear
that TI has made the gcc and gdb sources availa
Hi Robert,
Robert Spanton wrote:
Hi,
Please find a patch attached that creates three defines for the UCSSEL
bits of the USCI module of the MSP430x2xx series. I found these
useful in my code.
Cheers,
Rob Spanton
That's pretty much in keeping with what we did for other modules, so I
have c
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2007-12-14, Steve Underwood wrote:
Has anybody worked with the MSP430F2410 yet?
If you are using Windows its OK.
Is that true for 2330 as well?
Apparently not for any value of "using Windows" that
Hi,
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2007-12-14, Grant Edwards wrote:
Has anybody worked with the MSP430F2410 yet?
If you are using Windows its OK.
Is that true for 2330 as well?
Apparently not for any value of "using Windows" that I can come
up with.
I installed IAR kicks
dasasp...@gmx.de wrote:
As the new 16MHz MSP derivates now have been released, i`d like to use a
MSP430F2410.
So i've also got the Problem with the unsupported_device.
Up to now I used a MSP430F169 which really worked fine with the mspgcc tool
chain.
Is there any way to make the toolchain work
Oleg Verych wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 9:38 AM, rlim wrote:
Hello
Did anybody manage to get the ez430-rf2500 developer tool working with linux
(I'm using Kubuntu, 2.6.22-14-generic)?
I don't have/used one, but i did some development with original ez430 and Linux.
In the slau227.14 Detail
Andy Warner wrote:
Well, you chose not to get the answer to that issue. Maybe you should
choose an e-mail provider that does not practice censorship.
Hmm - well I'm really sorry about that. gmail and pobox (my two
favourite mailing list email weapons of choice) don't give me
problems in ge
Andy Warner wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007 9:29 AM, Steve Underwood wrote:
Andy Warner wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007 9:01 AM, Steve Underwood wrote:
[...]
msp430-gdbproxy msp430 --update-usb-fet
Doesn't seem to work for all cases. See my recent posting(s)
for one example
Andy Warner wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007 9:01 AM, Steve Underwood wrote:
[...]
msp430-gdbproxy msp430 --update-usb-fet
Doesn't seem to work for all cases. See my recent posting(s)
for one example where --update-usb-fet continues to fail in
the same manner. I still have not figured
Larry Young wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
I'm trying to use msp430-jtag and msp430-gdbproxy with the
'F2330 and F2274, and neither works. I've tried both the USB
interface and the parallel port interface (same results for
both processors):
...
msp430-gdbproxy w/ USB JTAG interface:
d
Hi all,
After a recent exchange about configuring a USB FET tool on a Linux
machine, I simplified my own configuration to use just the UDEV rules in
the attached file. This works fine with Fedora 6, and a Linux 2.6.22
kernel. I installed Fedora 8 on a machine today, and the same rules file
wi
Hi,
Several people have recently sent me private e-mail about mspgcc, where
my replies are blocked by their ISP. If you use an ISP with arbitrary
censorship policies like these, don't expect assistance.
Steve
Adam Dunkels wrote:
Chris Liechti wrote:
however i'm not using them because the bytes used for multiple stacks
without overflows are too precious and getting each stack depth as
minimal as possible isn't always easy (and still wasting bytes). i often
use the eventhandler that can be found i
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Griglack wrote:
Okay, this isn't a question about the compiler itself, but I would
like to use MSPGCC to develop a project on the new eZ430-2500 board
set. I would like to be able to use the SimpliciTI protocol for this,
but I am not sure if there is a version that has been port
John Regehr wrote:
Attached is a short test program that contains functions that use
volatile variables. The functions towards the top of the file, that
start with self_assign_, and_, or_ should all boil down to a load from
x and then a store of the same value to x.
Current mspgcc gets most
Grant Edwards wrote:
Back in March I found/fixed a bug in the BIS_SR macros in
msplibc:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.hardware.texas-instruments.msp430.gcc.user/5193
How do I go about getting that fix into CVS so that I don't
have to maintain my forked source tree?
I have changed iom
Oleg V. Kobrin wrote:
2007/10/2, Steve Underwood <mailto:ste...@coppice.org>>:
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2007-10-01, Grant Edwards mailto:gra...@visi.com>> wrote:
>
>> Didn't somebody port a bunch of demo stuff like the LED flasher
>>
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2007-10-01, Grant Edwards wrote:
Didn't somebody port a bunch of demo stuff like the LED flasher
program for the ez430/2013 to mspgcc? I swear I've seen the
mspgcc versions of "standard" demo programs available for
download somewhere, but I can't find them...
cloud9ine wrote:
Thanks, Grant..
You have been most helpful..
Now, do you have any idea why I might be getting the above error?
I've been googling spy-bi-wire, msp430, linux, gdbproxy etc. in all possible
combinations. I did land on Nicholas Preyss' page and Oleg Eyrich's page
and worked t
cloud9ine wrote:
Good one, but I did get that right, actually. I misspelt it in the post..
Sorry abt that.
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2007-09-27, cloud9ine wrote:
My command :
./msp430-gdbproxy --port= msp430 --spy-biwire /dev/ttyUSB0
Am I missing something?
The hyphen
cloud9ine wrote:
I found this thread and was wondering if the spy-bi-wire functionality ever
got built into the linux version of msp430-gdbproxy?
I am using the EZ430 tool and managed to get it recognized with a driver
patch. I am trying to connect to the tool with msp430-gdbproxy with the
--spy
Oleg Verych (Gmane) wrote:
25-09-2007, Grant Edwards:
On 2007-09-25, David Pettit wrote:
I also CCed patches here, hoping that there will be some testing and feed
back, but... So, if TI EZ430 USB tool is used by more people, i can start
effort again.
I think your efforts woul
Hi,
If you have a recent kernel, the USB FET tools should just work.
However, some distros don't have hotplug set up properly. You may need
something like a file called /etc/hotplug/usb/ti_usb_3410_5052 containing
#!/bin/bash
BOOT_CONFIG=1
ACTIVE_CONFIG=2
if [[ "$ACTION" != "add" ]]
then
Bevan Weiss wrote:
Rick Mann wrote:
Hi. I just wanted to see if there's any way to at least download code
to an MSP430 (ideally the EZ-USB dev kit). Even better would be
debugging support for one. I'd also settle for some other development
avenue. Are there any options I should cons
Rick Mann wrote:
Hi. I just wanted to see if there's any way to at least download code
to an MSP430 (ideally the EZ-USB dev kit). Even better would be
debugging support for one. I'd also settle for some other development
avenue. Are there any options I should consider?
The EZ430 works OK
Maik Heese wrote:
Dear All,
I think there is a bug in msp430-as,
which creates wrong binary code for:
*** @R0+, X(Rm)
MSPGCC does exactly the same thing with this code as the IAR assembler.
I think they should both report an error, rather than assemble the
instruction. However, the current
Robert Spanton wrote:
Hi,
Please find a patch below that fixes the name <-> number mapping of the
clock selection bits in of the MSP430 USI peripheral in the msp430 libc
headers. USISSEL_SMCLK was set to what USISSEL_SCLK should be - and
USISSEL_SCLK was missing.
Cheers,
Rob Spanton
diff
Hi,
You code does what I would expect, when I run it on an MSP430. The code
doesn't actually do what you said, though. It just adds 4 to the first
element of the array that is passed.
Alan007 wrote:
Dear All,
I'm trying to recompile some c code that was initially with IAR in gcc. My
funct
seems to work a little better... I mean that now i
have this :
"
$ msp430-gdbproxy --debug msp430
Remote proxy for GDB, v0.7.1, Copyright (C) 1999 Quality Quorum Inc.
MSP430 adaption Copyright (C) 2002 Chris Liechti and Steve Underwood
GDBproxy comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for detail
N. Coesel wrote:
At 16:36 03-08-07 +0200, you wrote:
Hello,
I am working with the Msp430 compiler for cygwin
mspgcc-20070216.exe
gcc version 3.2.3
Does the sprintf support long longs. In mine test program it doesn't
seem to work.
Am i doing something wrong ?
I've noticed similar be
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Paulsen wrote:
Some of the newer chips (I've used f2111 and f2232) have an RSEL3 in
place of XT5V in BCSCTL1. I didn't see support for this in CVS. The
following is what I'm using right now, but we may want a conditional
define to select one of the two definitions for that bi
Oszkar Ambrus wrote:
Hi,
Can I use gdb 6.6 with msp430?
Thanks,
Oszkar
No. They have been endlessly changing the internal target related
interfaces in GDB. If it is starting to stabilise again, it may be worth
trying to catch up with support for the latest GDB. I gave up before, as
I was f
Hi all,
Developer CVS access doesn't seem to be working. before I complain to
SourceForge, I thought I should check if anyone else has changed
something. I get:
Cannot access /cvsroot/mspgcc/CVSROOT
when I try to do anything.
Steve
Chris Liechti wrote:
Oszkar Ambrus schrieb:
I saw something about multilib support in the makefiles, like adding
msp1 and msp2 parameters. Does mspgcc support multilib?
And what's with msp1 msp2? Could I use e.g. msp2 to be msp430x, and
modify the libgcc sources appropriately?
you'd n
Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल wrote:
Hi,
I've just received a TI MSP430 eZ430-F2013 evaluation board, and I
wanted to try developing something for it. And, since I don't use
non-free software (except BIOS on my PC), I prefer using
mspgcc. I'm using gcc since past 4-5 years, but never tried building
G
Oszkar Ambrus wrote:
I have a further question regarding finishing up my work.
What else do I need to change? libgcc and msp430-libs will definitely
have to be changed,
since they use call and ret. So I'll probably use a macro, with
something like #ifdef msp430X
__MSP430X__ is already def
Oszkar Ambrus wrote:
Ok. Thanks for the reply.
I'll do that just as I finished objdump (I'm very close now), and I'll
email you the diffs.
Well, I took binutils-2.17, and patched with a patch from May, I guess.
And I used gcc-3.2.3, as the documentation says.
Those should be wise choices :-)
?? wrote:
diff -r msp430-libc.orig/include/iomacros.h msp430-libc/include/iomacros.h
315a316,319
> #if defined(__MSP430X__)
> #define sfra(x,x_) x=x_
> #endif
>
diff -r msp430-libc.orig/include/msp430/dma.h
msp430-libc/include/msp430/dma.h
56,57c56
< #define DMA0SAL 0x01D2 /* DMA chan
/include/msp430/dma.h:87: Error: junk at end of line, first
unrecognized chara
cter is `0'
make: *** [crt430xG4616.o] Error 1
2007/7/11, Steve Underwood < ste...@coppice.org
<mailto:ste...@coppice.org>>:
?? wrote:
>
> it's complaining for sfra()
?? wrote:
it's complaining for sfra() opcode. what should I do?
sfra() is only defined is __MSP430X__ is defined. currently sfra() is
only used if __MSP430_HAS_DMAX_3__ is defined, and that should only
happen for the MSP430FG461x, for which __MSP430X__ should also be defined.
Where
Hi Oszkar,
Oszkar Ambrus wrote:
Hello,
I've added msp430x support (i.e. support for 1Mb codesize, using calla
on 20 bits, and reta) to the compiler, the assembler and the linker.
Now if I set a section starting at let's say 1h, and put a
function in it, the calla is assembled and linked
Bevan Weiss wrote:
Hi Guys,
I've hit the code size limits for my particular device (a small
MSP430F2003) and so have started to look into the generated assembly
code to see what improvements can be made to it by hand. It seems
there's quite a few sections of code which are non-optimally gene
Dave Boland wrote:
Original Message
From: Steve Underwood
Apparently from: mspgcc-users-boun...@lists.sourceforge.net
To: "GCC for MSP430 - http://mspgcc.sf.net";
Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] General status for mspgcc?
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:38:23 +0800
Ian Lesnet wrote:
Is that true of all the combined chips? I was told last year to expect
a combined MSP430/CC1100 by Q2 07
There will be combined devices, but they won't appear for a while. It
seems it will be the 5xx devices which will now be integrated with the
Chipcon RF cores.
St
Dave Boland wrote:
I'm confused in regards to the eZ430- USB development tool. In a word, is
it fully supported (write/compile code, download, debug, etc.)? When I hear
that spybiwire is fully supported then my reaction is joy and happiness. But
when I hear that the MSP430X instruction
Steve Byan wrote:
On Jun 22, 2007, at 7:24 AM, Steve Underwood wrote:
David Smead wrote:
Given that TI doesn't actively support OpenSource development tools
for the MSP430, we're fortunate to have what we have. The tools
worked
well for the one product we used them for
David Smead wrote:
Greetings,
We have a rule here that all embedded software be developed using Linux
PCs. Since we're familiar with gcc on Linux, there's nothing much to
learn about a specific target.
I've now used gcc tools for the AVR, the MSP430, and most recently ARM
processors. Because
Dave Boland wrote:
Original Message
From: Grant Edwards
Apparently from: mspgcc-users-boun...@lists.sourceforge.net
To: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] Support for ez430-F2013
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:56:45 + (UTC)
On 2007-06-18, Steve
Dave Boland wrote:
I'm told that T.I. will soon release a new companion part that does wireless. However, it looks like MSPGCC may not be able to download code to the device (depending on who one asks) and can't debug using the USB port. Can any one confirm if this is true, or will change in the
Hi Oleg,
Thanks for your input.
I committed the TB3 -> Tb7 change, and I added sfra for handling the
long registers, like TI have done. I have also changed and commited
changes for DMAX, but I didn't have time to go through it properly, so
expect some remaining errors.
Steve
?? w
john curreri wrote:
On page 17-19 (513) of slau056.pdf
(http://focus.ti.com/lit/ug/slau056f/slau056f.pdf) USPIE0 sets USART0
to SPI mode in ME1 register.
msp430xG461x.h does not have a listing for USPIE0 but msp430xG43x.h
does (line 91).
Line 107 of msp430xG461x.h should have the following:
#de
Oleg Verych wrote:
From: Steve Underwood
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.hardware.texas-instruments.msp430.gcc.user
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:34:57 +0800
Hallo, Steve. Let me comment on that manual page, please.
http://mspgcc.sourceforge.net/manual/c1408.html
1. "Tips and tric
Neil Wyper wrote:
I agree that looks odd at first, but I don't think the compiler is
wrong. The loop you've provided doesn't do anything, so the optimizer
is free to modify it -- I would have expected the loop to be
completely removed. If you put something in the loop body, such as "
asm("no
Mario Becroft (mailing list) wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 08:12 +0800, Steve Underwood wrote:
The parallel port FET tool has no facility for programming the JTAG
fuse. Neither does the little EZ430 tool. Only the full featured USB FET
tool is built to blow the fuses.
I don&#
Mario Becroft (mailing list) wrote:
Hi,
We are having some trouble programming the security fuse of an MSP430
device using the mspgcc tools and the TI parallel port programming tool
running under Linux. We have applied the correct voltage to the TEST
pin, but there does not seem to be any comman
David Smead wrote:
Steve,
I didn't find the peripherals on the MSP430 all that weird. In fact the
I didn't say they were weird. Quite the opposite. They are flexible, and
so bit more complex than those in most MCUs. That means they require a
bit more learning at the start.
ADC is very sim
David Smead wrote:
Steve,
As you say, the MSP430 barely sips power, and with a fast 12-bit ADC
onboard its a great machine. We are, in fact, using an MSP430 in a
product that we sell many thousands annually. There are some other very
nice attributes of the MSP430, the instruction set being on
N. Coesel wrote:
At 12:44 12-04-07 +0200, you wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2007-04-11, wh_f...@telus.net wrote:
The latest compiler supports the extended CPU; the problem is
actually in the linker--I can't seem to make it recognise both
chunks of code space (that below and a
wh_f...@telus.net wrote:
Hi Oszkar,
The latest compiler supports the extended CPU; the problem is actually in the
linker--I can't seem to make it recognise both chunks of code space (that below
and above the vectors). Below is my original posting. I'm hoping someone
knows the answer now.
Hi Grant,
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2007-04-02, jmreu...@juno.com wrote:
Is there a compiler/linker parameter to avoid wasted RAM
between global variables? I have a significant number of
global vars, made up of chars, ints, and a few floats. When I
look at the list output file it shows tha
Robert Spanton wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to get an MSP430F2234 to debug through a 4-wire JTAG
interface with a TI USB UIF debugger for the past few hours. I've tried
everything I can think of, but msp430-gdbproxy still says "Could not find
device (or device not supported) (4)".
Does/shou
Hi Robert,
Linux 2.6.20 is supposed to have the necessary changes to recognise the
FET tools, but I haven't checked that. I am still using 2.6.19.
Steve
Robert Spanton wrote:
Hi,
I recently bought a TI MSP-FET430UIF and an EZ430-F2013. I looked through
the mailing list, and found a kernel
John Luciani wrote:
Is there MSPGCC support for the MSP430F20x2 processors?
I am using msp430-gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 and the MSP430F20x2 is not in the
--target-help list for CPUs. Is there a CPU that is similar enough that I can
use?
Use GCC 3.2.3, and you will find the MSP430F20xx devices are suppo
David Brown wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
I've noticed that msp430-gcc 3.2.3 often generates
unnecessarily large frame sizes?
Can you post some compilable code that demonstrates these issues? I
haven't been able to reproduce them with simple test code - in every
case, independent b
Berndt Josef Wulf wrote:
On Friday 29 December 2006 13:24, Berndt Josef Wulf wrote:
G'day,
A long time back there were discussions on getting msp430 support
integrated into the gcc project. What is the current status? I noticed
msp430 support in binutils but none in gcc-4.x.
cheerio Berndt
Hi Advait,
Advait Jain wrote:
I am using msp430fe427 for an electric energy metering application.
As the C compiler I am using mspgcc (win32) release 20061126.
I found the following error in the header file esp430e.h:
addresses of these 2 registers are interchanged -
STARTCURR_FRAC0228h (
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-12-09, David Dyck wrote:
I'm having trouble with mspgcc version 3.2.3 accessing a variable
that's been declared as volatile twice, when my code refers to it
only once.
[...]
Note that the code is accessing the switch variable twice, in the cmp
instr
helmut.schae...@pruftechnik.com wrote:
Today i got my TI ez430-F2013 Tool.
But its not recognized on USB Port when plugged in; i.e. no hwwizard
pops up neither it can be seen via USBview. (XP-Pro)
The F2013 seems to be programmed with the standard ~2Hz LED blinking
demo.
I already found info
Paolo Zebelloni wrote:
I made a full download/rebuild of mspgcc, then I rebuild my current FG4619
project with new compiler: I've found that vectors start from 0xffc0 (right),
but end at 0xffdf. Nothing is written from 0xffe0 to 0x.
This is wrong.
I think that __MSP430X__ (used in signal.h
m...@horizon.com wrote:
So you never got msp430-gdbproxy running?
I didn't really try; I thought it didn't support USB FETs on Linux.
Has that changed?
If you have sorted out the USB ID issue in your TUSB3410 driver you will
find the latest msp430-gdbproxy works with the UIF and EZ430
Chris Liechti wrote:
Peter Jansen schrieb:
HI Chris,
i'm trying to build gcc/4.1.1 on cygwin. but it fails on libgcc (paths
stripped down):
>
has somebody else experienced the same problem? or is the build working
on other platforms?
Yes that is the state o
Hi Robert,
When I try exactly what you describe it compiles OK on my machine. Can
you give more information? What is the platform you are using? Which
version of mspgcc?
Regards,
Steve
Robert Spanton wrote:
Hi,
I'm having some trouble with using static and non-static global variables.
I'
Oh, don't do that. We already have a patch that fixes it properly, and
then anyone can add any ID they wish on the command line. That seems a
much better solution. The onyl issue is we didn't submit it to the
maintainers.
Steve
Oleg Verych wrote:
usb-serial: ti_usb, TI ez430 development too
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-11-15, Steve Underwood wrote:
There has definitely been a slowdown, though. The USB tools
are much faster, but that probably doesn't help you.
One more question
After sifting through the mailing list archive, I'm still
rather vagu
Hi,
I used to keep msp430-gdbproxy separate from the Sourceforge project
page, partly because it isn't open source and I don't know if the
Sourceforge people would object to it being there. After a number of
requests, I have finally put the software on the Sourceforge site. If
you go to the d
Cyril Holweck wrote:
the patch for half of the newest CPU with 4 digits has a conflict.
simple compilation leads to the following:
msp430-ld -m msp430x2274 [...]
msp430-ld: cannot represent machine `msp:220'
http://mspgcc.cvs.sourceforge.net/mspgcc/gcc/gcc-3.3/gcc/config/msp430/msp430.c?rev
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-11-15, Steve Underwood wrote:
Is there any way one can get access to the source code in order
to fix these problems?
It is being maintained. I have no problems under Linux or Windows with
the current version. Can you tell us what problems you have
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-11-13, Grant Edwards wrote:
Since upgrading to a version of gdb-proxy that recognizes
recent parts, I've been unable to stop the processor while it's
running. Whenever I attempt to stop a running program, gdb
reports:
Watchdog has expired. Target detached.
Grant Edwards wrote:
Is msp430-gdbserver still being maintained?
Downloading via parallel port and the --debug option both seem
to have been broken since April.
Is there any way one can get access to the source code in order
to fix these problems?
It is being maintained. I have no problem
Hi,
In about June we fixed the Linux driver for the TUSB3410, and got the
USB FET tools working under Linux. Did anyone feed the fix back to the
driver's maintainer, so it can get into the standard Linux distribution?
If not we need to sort that out now.
Steve
lyxer wrote:
IN lierda,the usb tools is about 100~200 dollor
Steve Underwood wrote:
lyxer wrote:
HI:
everyon
I am a student of china,the olimex's msp430-jtag-tiny is a wonderful tools
for msp430 jtag emulator,but the price is 169 EURO,in china,this price is
so
big that
lyxer wrote:
HI:
everyon
I am a student of china,the olimex's msp430-jtag-tiny is a wonderful tools
for msp430 jtag emulator,but the price is 169 EURO,in china,this price is so
big that I can not buy it as a DIYER
SO,I want to diy a USB jtag for msp430 for my notebook computer(the computer
has
Rick Jenkins wrote:
I'm a little confused about the state of programming support in the current
toolset. As far as I can see from the documentation, USB programmers are
supported only under Windows. On the other hand, in Volume 4, issue 21 of
this list Steve Underwood wrote:
M
Chris,
Operschall, Robert - ACD wrote:
Hi Peter,
Could you elaborate on your second response please? Mainly, the
NO associated with developing code for the msp430x16xx. I'm having
problems with the linker in the latest Windows distribution (May 2006)
recognizing the msp430x1612, repor
John Griessen wrote:
So, gcc-3.2.3 seems to compile OK with gcc-4.0.4 Does a gcc-3.2.3
work any faster when compiled with more recent gcc-4.0 or gcc-4.1 on the host
machine? Are there pitfalls?
The only pitfall we found is one we fixed. The standard GCC 3.2.3
distribution won't build
Paolo Zebelloni wrote:
May be there is a small error in linker scripts, at least for FG4619 devices:
flash start address is 0x1100 instead of 0x2100. Also size looks wrong.
As Chris Liechti knows, there are still problem in FG461x erase/programming,
but it's not clear why...
I just updated t
Rick Mann wrote:
I just got a couple of EX430 dev kits, and have begun looking for
ways to avoid installing windows on my Mac OS X machine. I found
MSPGCC, which is great, but I see no solution for talking to the
EZ430 USB programming device.
As I read more and more online, it seems that
LvA wrote:
Hello,
From this thread, I should assume that msp430-gdbproxy has very little
chance to have a Mac OS X version, shouldn't I?
I have no idea what it would take to make the software work on a MAC,
since I know very little about them, however.
The USB FET tool basically loo
.
MSP430 adaption Copyright (C) 2002 Chris Liechti and Steve Underwood
GDBproxy comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details
use `--warranty' option. This is Open Source software. You are
welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Use the
'--copying' option for details.
Steve Hosgood wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
Sorry if I sounded a bit shrill, but you're suggesting a
compiler which refuses to compile 100% legal standard ANSI C
source code. I just don't see how that's a real option.
That's more like it!
Sorry, Steve Underwoo
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-09-13, Steve Underwood wrote:
I agree that generating wrong code is no good. However, there
are other options, like complaining and not generating
anything.
That's insane. What's wrong with generating mov.b
instructions? What wrong with call
Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi All,
The real question here is what we should do about these misalignment
issues. If the code handles them properly, you really won't like the
result. The MSP430 doesn't allow misaligned loads and stores, so they
have to be simulated by a mass of instructions. The s
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-09-12, Neil Wyper wrote:
My program is broken because mspgcc 3.2.3 is generating
unaligned word accesses. I'm calling memset() and memcpy()
fill in the fields in a packed struct. Since I've requested a
2-byte copy/set mspgcc is optimizing some of those memset
Neil Wyper wrote:
On 9/12/06, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-09-12, Grant Edwards wrote:
My program is broken because mspgcc 3.2.3 is generating
unaligned word accesses. I'm calling memset() and memcpy()
fill in the fields in a packed struct. Since I've requested a
2-byte copy/set m
Neil Wyper wrote:
On 9/12/06, ozzloy wrote:
i am trying to convert code written for the IAR compiler to the msp430-gcc
on windows.
right now it is complaining about this line:
__interrupt void ISRTimerA0 (void)
IntService.c:11: syntax error before "void"
i've read the following link. it's
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-08-31, Shoaib Javed wrote:
Also visit http://kurt.on.ufanet.ru/ . I don't know the
licensing requirements but I found this programme fairly
useful.
Thanks! That should do nicely.
I did eventually find instructions for anon CVS access that
worked (there
Grant Edwards wrote:
So far I've just been using gdb/msp430-gdbproxy for programming
boards under Linux. It's working fine, but I need to set up a
way for Windows XP users to program boards (using a parallel
port JTAG interface).
It needs to be as simple as possible: start the program, browse
Rick Jenkins wrote:
I'm really impressed by the build script in:
http://mspgcc.cvs.sourceforge.net/mspgcc/packaging/README-MAINTAINER.txt
but README-MAINTAINER.txt contains the cvs address glitch from my previous
post, and the command line:
chwown $USER.$USER /opt/mspgcc
has a typo in "cho
1 - 100 of 630 matches
Mail list logo
