Hi David,
...
However, I wonder if it is not better to work directly towards 4.1 support,
and skip 4.0 altogether? To my understanding, gcc 4.0 exists more as a
> ..snip
I thought I would start with 4.0 and try and get that working, once I
had 4.0 working to some extent and knew my way aroun
> improvements for some code, but in many cases produces worse
> code than 3.4.x. The real difference will be with 4.1, where a number of
> significant changes have been implemented. For example, with 4.1 it will
Well, yes...
In short, the best is to stick on 4.1...
I had some ideas which I pl
> Peter,
> > I have been working on a patch for gcc-4.0.2, and have it compiling now,
> > although I have some problems with the machine description file and
> > optimisations. I would like to put these into the public cvs so maybe
> > someone who knows how to fix it could, or when I get the chance
Peter,
> I have been working on a patch for gcc-4.0.2, and have it compiling now,
> although I have some problems with the machine description file and
> optimisations. I would like to put these into the public cvs so maybe
> someone who knows how to fix it could, or when I get the chance Ill have
Hi All,
I have been working on a patch for gcc-4.0.2, and have it compiling now,
although I have some problems with the machine description file and
optimisations. I would like to put these into the public cvs so maybe
someone who knows how to fix it could, or when I get the chance Ill have
a
