Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspdebug 0.20 and MSP430F2418

2012-10-15 Thread Daniel Beer
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:16:34AM +0200, Michiel Konstapel wrote: > $ git bisect bad > 08cd326e669c49adfa3c60ecc11fe75b2405427b is the first bad commit > commit 08cd326e669c49adfa3c60ecc11fe75b2405427b > Author: Daniel Beer > Date: Fri Jul 6 08:50:44 2012 +1200 > > Fix support for MSP430F2

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspdebug 0.20 and MSP430F2418

2012-10-15 Thread Michiel Konstapel
> If you have time to spare, a git bisect would be really helpful. It'll > probably take about half an hour of testing, though. If you have an > up-to-date git repository sitting there, start with: > > git bisect start > git bisect bad v0.20 > git bisect good v0.18 > > After that, you

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspdebug 0.20 and MSP430F2418

2012-10-12 Thread Michiel Konstapel
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Beer [mailto:dlb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 21:48 > To: Michiel Konstapel > Cc: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspdebug 0.20 and MSP430F2418 > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 0

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspdebug 0.20 and MSP430F2418

2012-10-11 Thread Daniel Beer
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:42:37AM +0200, Michiel Konstapel wrote: > > Hi Michiel, > > > > Looks like perhaps I have broken something, though I can't see what it > > might be. Does the first attempt at identification always fail with > > 0.20, and never fail with 0.18? > > That does seem to be th

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspdebug 0.20 and MSP430F2418

2012-10-11 Thread Michiel Konstapel
> Hi Michiel, > > Looks like perhaps I have broken something, though I can't see what it > might be. Does the first attempt at identification always fail with > 0.20, and never fail with 0.18? That does seem to be the case: $ sudo ~/bin/mspdebug-0.18 uif -j 'prog build/lnode_msp2/main.ihex' MSPD

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspdebug 0.20 and MSP430F2418

2012-10-10 Thread Daniel Beer
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 07:47:08AM +0200, Michiel Konstapel wrote: > Trying to open UIF on /dev/ttyUSB0... > Initializing FET... > FET protocol version is 20401000 > Configured for JTAG (2) > Set Vcc: 3000 mV > fet: FET returned error code 4 (Could not find device (or device not > supported)) > fet

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspdebug 0.20 and MSP430F2418

2012-10-10 Thread Michiel Konstapel
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Beer [mailto:dlb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 01:21 > To: Michiel Konstapel > Cc: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspdebug 0.20 and MSP430F2418 > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 0

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspdebug 0.20 and MSP430F2418

2012-10-09 Thread Daniel Beer
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 06:13:41PM +0200, Michiel Konstapel wrote: > After updating mspdebug to version 0.20 (from the tinyprod repository), > it seems I can no longer flash any MSP430F2418s, but a '247 works fine. > Attached is the output from 0.18, 0.20 (both with and without -d). > Did something

[Mspgcc-users] mspdebug 0.20 and MSP430F2418

2012-10-09 Thread Michiel Konstapel
After updating mspdebug to version 0.20 (from the tinyprod repository), it seems I can no longer flash any MSP430F2418s, but a '247 works fine. Attached is the output from 0.18, 0.20 (both with and without -d). Did something break, or did I break something? :-) Best, Michiel ---