Re: [Mspgcc-users] binutils and missing devices.

2005-08-24 Thread Chris Liechti
Dmitry wrote: from now I would like to reorganize binutils: Therefore, I just want to create msp430x[RAM]x[ROM] devices For example: xx0x: 1K ROM, 128 RAM xx1x: 2K ROM, 128 RAM xx2x: 4K ROM, 256 RAM ... 16xx11: 48K ROM, 10K RAM while this uses TI's description it isn't very transparent f

Re: [Mspgcc-users] binutils and missing devices.

2005-08-24 Thread David Brown
This sounds like a perfectly good arrangement - if it makes your life easier for maintaining the binutils, then fine. The majority of users do not call the assembler or linker directly, and therefore only see the compiler's -mcpu flag. Since you are leaving that unchanged, I think most people wil

Re: [Mspgcc-users] binutils and missing devices.

2005-08-24 Thread Corentin Plouet
Dmitry a écrit : Fellows, [...] What do you think? That does make sense :-) By the way, IIRC (I tried to check in mspgcc and binutils repositories through CVSweb if it is still the case, but I did not found the directory where they are located), the linker scripts supplied with mspgcc