Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-14 Thread David Brown
On 14/09/13 01:25, DJ Delorie wrote: For small targets like this, it is common to compile C++ with -fno-rtti True, but even the static objects must be initialized code adds some runtime space/time cost. It's not much, but the smallest MSP430's don't have much rom/ram to spare. Correct me

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-14 Thread David Brown
On 14/09/13 02:45, Brendan Conoboy wrote: On 09/13/2013 12:12 AM, David Brown wrote: Do you know of any timeplans for when it will be possible to get official toolchain snapshot packages with gcc, binutils and a library as prebuilt packages and source bundles? As a developer, I can play

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-14 Thread DJ Delorie
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but this only applies when the initialisation involves a constructor function rather than just assignment of a fixed value. Correct. are all run before main() is called. These might add extra code space because the constructor calls can't be fully inlined