How about, using maik koster solution to get the disabled computers into sccm
database and then try to compare these disabled computers(AD) with sccm
computers (kind of vlookup).
More information via
http://eskonr.com/2012/12/how-to-get-ad-computer-info-into-sccm-configmgr-20072012-database/
We did look at putting multiple images on the disk but it's not supported by
Prestaged media as there can only be a single image referenced.
We could go down the custom scripts route but we really want to keep it as
simple as possible.
Dave
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
We did look at putting multiple images on the disk but it's not supported by
Prestaged media as there can only be a single image referenced.
We could go down the custom scripts route but we really want to keep it as
simple as possible.
Dave
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
Nice post ☺ Thanks for that Eswar.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Eswar Koneti
Sent: 20 January 2015 09:04
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Dealing with Disabled Machines?
How about, using maik koster solution to get
Thats the one. ☺
//A
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Russ Rimmerman
Sent: den 20 januari 2015 04:52
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference
Here’s a Powershell method to retrieve them
Brilliant :)
Now how about same for STATE messages :)
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: 20 January 2015 11:52
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference
Thats the one.
Should follow the same logic, just different DLL’s.
//A
http://2pintsoftware.com
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Jason Wallace
Sent: den 20 januari 2015 13:20
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference
select
SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client
from SMS_R_System where datediff(day,CreationDate,getdate()) 1
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
If you re-image a machine, are the latest updates injected in the WIM or
perhaps advertised toward the unknown or osd deployment collection, etc? That
way the updates should be installed at build time.
If not, perhaps a compliance setting that checks the status and compliance
state for
Follow-up on this.
What if you are re-imaging a machine? If the machine was discovered when it
was created a month ago by System Discovery, it won't show-up in the
collection of new machines.
How do you get around something like this?
From: sccmfun [mailto:sccm...@hotmail.com]
Sent:
Also set a high coll refresh on this, maybe 30 minutes. It's not a big hit
either and it works quite well.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:25 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE:
Oh man... as my dear old friend Eduardo would say... I sure wish there was a
way to control BITS from the server side...
Maybe fairy godmother, Cinderella, Santa or even Mary
censoredhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=291kT7LvQ0k Poppins could come up
with something?
Best wishes,
Someone who ate
There's a push here to enable transactional replication of the ConfigMgr
database for an enterprise reporting project. I just wanted to know if
transactional replication of the database is supported, any adverse effects I
should be aware of and if anyone has some recommended reading for me to
If history of that machine is not important, delete machine from SCCM before
re-image. That should create new record in SCCM after re-image and creation
date will be also be new, so it will fall in to new machines collection.
Anand
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
Interesting
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:41 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Wish there was a way to control BITS
I know natin', I am from Barcelona!
//A
Transactional replication of the site database is only supported for the MP
role. This is so because only a subset of the site database is used by an MP,
and not the entire database.
Consider using Log Shipping instead -
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms151224.aspx
Sent from my
Right click tools for Client Information module works only when client is
online (ping happens) .For report,you should try to manipulate the below SQL
Views to obtain the required information.
vSMS_BoundaryGroup--stores information about boundary
groupsvSMS_Boundary--stores informtion about
I know natin', I am from Barcelona!
//A
http://2pintsoftware.com/stifler-bits-bandwidth-throttling/
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Phil Wilcock
Sent: den 20 januari 2015 19:56
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Wish
18 matches
Mail list logo
