RE: [mssms] Apps to user groups

2016-07-12 Thread Stuart Watret
Thanks Adam, I’ll try that also. Created a fresh app, did the deployment to the dp, prior to the deployment of the app (prior to this I’d done the DP’s from the deployment wizard) and only chose one dp – app showed up as soon as policy was refreshed. I’ll try some more permutations. From:

RE: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend

2016-07-12 Thread Schultz, Michael A
We just implemented something similar. We started with this script http://sysdevpro.com/blog/microsoft/sccm-2012-r2-cmadd2coll-ps1-adding-machine-to-a-collection/ One of our OSD guys, that is awesome with scripting, took it and created a new UI and we now use it for techs to add users or

RE: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend

2016-07-12 Thread Jason Condo
I have found this tool effective for just giving users access to add and remove objects from collections. https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/rslaten/2014/03/10/configuration-manager-2012-direct-membership-collection-manager/ Thanks, Jason Condo | Bennett Adelson

[mssms] RE: Tool to Edit Applicability Rules (Add Win 10)

2016-07-12 Thread Krueger, Jeff
Probably doesn't help you now, but this is why you want to use global conditions so you can go back and change the one thing instead of going back into many apps. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016

[mssms] Tool to Edit Applicability Rules (Add Win 10)

2016-07-12 Thread Marcum, John
Tried to post this to user voice but I have no votes left so I can't post new ideas. :( Give to a tool to easily add Win10 to all Applicability Rules Many of us have 100's or even 1000's of apps in the application model. Having to manually add Win10 to the applicability rules is very tedious

Re: [mssms] Apps to user groups

2016-07-12 Thread Adam Juelich
Are you using the option 'pre-deploy to users primary device?' I found that if you don't select that, the Deployment will only show up when the client checks policy while that user is logged into the machine. In order to get UDA deployments to process quicker I had to select that option. I'm

Re: [mssms] Apps to user groups

2016-07-12 Thread Stuart Watret
Did a new app last night, new deployment to user collection with one account as a direct member. Sure enough nothing. Came in his morning it was there. Just removed the deployment, refreshed policy and it disappeared. Immediately re-created a new deployment to the same user collection,

[mssms] RE: Looking for justification to maintain SA on SCCM and win7/Win10 Ent Ed skus

2016-07-12 Thread Michael Niehaus
Here's a good comparison of the client features by SKU: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/WindowsForBusiness/Compare For new SA for Windows agreements (being renamed, so you'll see references to Windows 10 Enterprise E3 now - not a new SKU, just Software Assurance renamed), MDOP is included.

Re: [mssms] RE: Looking for justification to maintain SA on SCCM and win7/Win10 Ent Ed skus

2016-07-12 Thread Michael Roach
Agreed. With regards to SA is it required to take advantage of the incremental updates like 1606 or is it only required for when they release say ConfigMgr vNext? > On Jul 12, 2016, at 10:39 AM, Marcum, John wrote: > > IMO The best justification is that if you drop

Re: [mssms] RE: Looking for justification to maintain SA on SCCM and win7/Win10 Ent Ed skus

2016-07-12 Thread Michael Roach
We are looking to use MDOP and AppV in conjunction with the Win10 Ent rollout. > On Jul 12, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Krueger, Jeff wrote: > > Well just off the top of my head for the desktops, is do you use the MDOP > toolkit at all? MBAM is huge for us, we encrypt all endpoints

[mssms] RE: Looking for justification to maintain SA on SCCM and win7/Win10 Ent Ed skus

2016-07-12 Thread Marcum, John
IMO The best justification is that if you drop SA you lose all upgrade rights. When you decide you want to go to a new OS or a new Office version or new CM version the cost will KILL you. If SA didn't make sense it wouldn't sell to almost every enterprise organization in the world.

[mssms] RE: Looking for justification to maintain SA on SCCM and win7/Win10 Ent Ed skus

2016-07-12 Thread Krueger, Jeff
Well just off the top of my head for the desktops, is do you use the MDOP toolkit at all? MBAM is huge for us, we encrypt all endpoints and having MBAM makes managing that a lot easier. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On

[mssms] RE: Looking for justification to maintain SA on SCCM and win7/Win10 Ent Ed skus

2016-07-12 Thread Marcum, John
Email your TAM, they can give you everything you need for this. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Roach Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 9:50 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Looking for

[mssms] Looking for justification to maintain SA on SCCM and win7/Win10 Ent Ed skus

2016-07-12 Thread Michael Roach
Hi all, It's that time of year again and I have a half day to come up with justification for maintaining SA on our licenses of ConfigMgr (we're running latest 1602) and our desktop OSE (currently Windows 7 Enterprise with a planned implementation of Windows 10 Enterprise to begin in early 2017

RE: [mssms] RE: Apps to user groups

2016-07-12 Thread Marcum, John
Send me the client logs offline. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 9:22 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Apps to user groups Hi John, I’ve simplified it today, targeting a