RE: [mssms] Dealing with Disabled Machines?
How about, using maik koster solution to get the disabled computers into sccm database and then try to compare these disabled computers(AD) with sccm computers (kind of vlookup). More information via http://eskonr.com/2012/12/how-to-get-ad-computer-info-into-sccm-configmgr-20072012-database/ Regards, Eswar Koneti www.eskonr.com Sent from Mobile Device, excuse any typo's as a result. --- Original Message --- From: Matt Browne mbro...@viridor.co.uk Sent: January 20, 2015 12:32 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Dealing with Disabled Machines? We currently have a script that disables machines (in AD) and moves them to another OU when they haven't been online for x days. The issue I have is that the machines are then invisible to SCCM and so they don't update which collection they are in. We have a collection for 'All Desktops and Laptops' which now has a lot of old disabled machines in it, this plays havoc with your compliance reports. Does anyone know if it is possible to update the computer objects in SCCM so that they report the correct collection (and OU)? Ideally we would like the collection to exactly mimic the AD OU. P.s We want to keep the old objects in SCCM so we have some information about old machines, ie we don't want to 'clean up' them. Matt Browne ICT Desktop Support Analyst 01823 624629 | Internal Extn 202629 Viridor House I Youngman Place I Taunton I TA1 1AP [VIRIDOR LANDSCAPE LOGO COLOUR]http://www.viridor.co.uk/ [https://g.twimg.com/About_logoUsage.png] http://www.twitter.com/viridoruk [f Logo] http://www.facebook.com/viridor [Member-Logo-Examples.png] http://www.linkedin.com/company/viridor [Logo for web] https://www.youtube.com/user/ViridorTV --- Information in this message is sent in confidence and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, distribution or copying of the information is strictly forbidden. Please notify the sender immediately by return email or telephone 01823 721400. If you received this email in error please delete it and any copies of it from your system. Viridor Waste Management Limited Registered Office: Peninsula House, Rydon Lane, Exeter EX2 7HR Registered in England No. 575069 ---
[mssms] RE: SCCM 2007 Prestaged Media with Multiple Task Sequences
We did look at putting multiple images on the disk but it's not supported by Prestaged media as there can only be a single image referenced. We could go down the custom scripts route but we really want to keep it as simple as possible. Dave From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: 19 January 2015 14:48 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com; mdt...@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: SCCM 2007 Prestaged Media with Multiple Task Sequences Get all your images on one part each? Then use your sequence do decide which ones to keep. Or if you don't care about the time, include media for all images on disk, and use sequence decide?? //A From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Dave West Sent: den 19 januari 2015 15:45 To: mdt...@lists.myitforum.commailto:mdt...@lists.myitforum.com; mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] SCCM 2007 Prestaged Media with Multiple Task Sequences We want to build a prestaged image for our OEM using our Windows 7 64-bit image. However, what will happen if another task sequence is selected that uses a different image, say Windows 7 32-bit, when the computer is deployed on site? I ask as the documentation says that the prestaged media will have the task sequence variable _SMSTSMediaType = OEMmedia which means that it will skip the 'Format and Partition Disk' step (assuming you add the check condition) and it will automatically skip the 'Apply Operating System Image' step. This variable does not check as to what specific image has been applied, it assumes that the task sequence you are running references the same image used when creating the prestaged media image. So, if the prestaged media image uses a 64-bit image and we select a task sequence that uses a 32-bit image, according to the documentation, the task sequence it will still skip the 'Format and Partition Disk' and either skip the 'Apply Operating System Image' step altogether, or if there is logic built in to detect the image used compared to that being applied, it will apply the 32-bit image over the top of the 64-bit prestage image already on the disk. Either way the deployment is wrong. To combat this we have tried adding a signature file to our images and then adding a task to set a task sequence variable based on the existence of the signature file. If the file matches the image used in the task sequence then we skip the 'Format and Partition Disk' step as documented, however if the file does not match (i.e. the image to be applied is not the same as the prestaged image) then we do perform the 'Format and Partition Disk' step. The problem is that even though we have formatted the disk, because the task sequence variable _SMSTSMediaType = OEMmedia the 'Apply Operating System Image' step fails as it is looking for the prestaged image. How can we use prestaged media images but still allow other images (task sequences) to be applied without having to use separate boot media? Can anyone help with this? Dave West Senior Operations Analyst Room 301 Babbage Building | Plymouth University | Drake Circus | Plymouth | PL4 8AA | UK Tel: 01752 587247tel://+44752587247/ | Email: dave.w...@plymouth.ac.ukmailto:dave.w...@plymouth.ac.uk [cid:image001.png@01D0299F.2666E200] [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care,
[MDT-OSD] RE: SCCM 2007 Prestaged Media with Multiple Task Sequences
We did look at putting multiple images on the disk but it's not supported by Prestaged media as there can only be a single image referenced. We could go down the custom scripts route but we really want to keep it as simple as possible. Dave From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: 19 January 2015 14:48 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com; mdt...@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: SCCM 2007 Prestaged Media with Multiple Task Sequences Get all your images on one part each? Then use your sequence do decide which ones to keep. Or if you don't care about the time, include media for all images on disk, and use sequence decide?? //A From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Dave West Sent: den 19 januari 2015 15:45 To: mdt...@lists.myitforum.commailto:mdt...@lists.myitforum.com; mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] SCCM 2007 Prestaged Media with Multiple Task Sequences We want to build a prestaged image for our OEM using our Windows 7 64-bit image. However, what will happen if another task sequence is selected that uses a different image, say Windows 7 32-bit, when the computer is deployed on site? I ask as the documentation says that the prestaged media will have the task sequence variable _SMSTSMediaType = OEMmedia which means that it will skip the 'Format and Partition Disk' step (assuming you add the check condition) and it will automatically skip the 'Apply Operating System Image' step. This variable does not check as to what specific image has been applied, it assumes that the task sequence you are running references the same image used when creating the prestaged media image. So, if the prestaged media image uses a 64-bit image and we select a task sequence that uses a 32-bit image, according to the documentation, the task sequence it will still skip the 'Format and Partition Disk' and either skip the 'Apply Operating System Image' step altogether, or if there is logic built in to detect the image used compared to that being applied, it will apply the 32-bit image over the top of the 64-bit prestage image already on the disk. Either way the deployment is wrong. To combat this we have tried adding a signature file to our images and then adding a task to set a task sequence variable based on the existence of the signature file. If the file matches the image used in the task sequence then we skip the 'Format and Partition Disk' step as documented, however if the file does not match (i.e. the image to be applied is not the same as the prestaged image) then we do perform the 'Format and Partition Disk' step. The problem is that even though we have formatted the disk, because the task sequence variable _SMSTSMediaType = OEMmedia the 'Apply Operating System Image' step fails as it is looking for the prestaged image. How can we use prestaged media images but still allow other images (task sequences) to be applied without having to use separate boot media? Can anyone help with this? Dave West Senior Operations Analyst Room 301 Babbage Building | Plymouth University | Drake Circus | Plymouth | PL4 8AA | UK Tel: 01752 587247tel://+44752587247/ | Email: dave.w...@plymouth.ac.ukmailto:dave.w...@plymouth.ac.uk [cid:image001.png@01D0299F.2666E200] [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care,
RE: [mssms] Dealing with Disabled Machines?
Nice post ☺ Thanks for that Eswar. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Eswar Koneti Sent: 20 January 2015 09:04 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Dealing with Disabled Machines? How about, using maik koster solution to get the disabled computers into sccm database and then try to compare these disabled computers(AD) with sccm computers (kind of vlookup). More information via http://eskonr.com/2012/12/how-to-get-ad-computer-info-into-sccm-configmgr-20072012-database/ Regards, Eswar Koneti www.eskonr.comhttp://www.eskonr.com Sent from Mobile Device, excuse any typo's as a result. --- Original Message --- From: Matt Browne mbro...@viridor.co.ukmailto:mbro...@viridor.co.uk Sent: January 20, 2015 12:32 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Dealing with Disabled Machines? We currently have a script that disables machines (in AD) and moves them to another OU when they haven’t been online for x days. The issue I have is that the machines are then invisible to SCCM and so they don’t update which collection they are in. We have a collection for ‘All Desktops and Laptops’ which now has a lot of old disabled machines in it, this plays havoc with your compliance reports. Does anyone know if it is possible to update the computer objects in SCCM so that they report the correct collection (and OU)? Ideally we would like the collection to exactly mimic the AD OU. P.s We want to keep the old objects in SCCM so we have some information about old machines, ie we don’t want to ‘clean up’ them. Matt Browne ICT Desktop Support Analyst 01823 624629 | Internal Extn 202629 Viridor House I Youngman Place I Taunton I TA1 1AP [VIRIDOR LANDSCAPE LOGO COLOUR]http://www.viridor.co.uk/ [https://g.twimg.com/About_logoUsage.png] http://www.twitter.com/viridoruk [f Logo] http://www.facebook.com/viridor [Member-Logo-Examples.png] http://www.linkedin.com/company/viridor [Logo for web] https://www.youtube.com/user/ViridorTV Information in this message is sent in confidence and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, distribution or copying of the information is strictly forbidden. Please notify the sender immediately by return email or telephone 01823 721400. If you received this email in error please delete it and any copies of it from your system. Viridor Waste Management Limited Registered Office: Peninsula House, Rydon Lane, Exeter EX2 7HR Registered in England No. 575069 --- Information in this message is sent in confidence and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, distribution or copying of the information is strictly forbidden. Please notify the sender immediately by return email or telephone 01823 721400. If you received this email in error please delete it and any copies of it from your system. Viridor Waste Management Limited Registered Office: Peninsula House, Rydon Lane, Exeter EX2 7HR Registered in England No. 575069 ---
RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference
Thats the one. ☺ //A From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Russ Rimmerman Sent: den 20 januari 2015 04:52 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Here’s a Powershell method to retrieve them http://blogs.technet.com/b/saudm/archive/2015/01/20/enumerating-status-message-strings-in-powershell.aspx From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 1:30 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Found it, I could create a small tool that sucks out all the standard MS messages ID’s if that would be of use to people? I bet the DLL’s have a lot of old stuff in them that is not in use any more though, so unsure how beneficial that would be? //A http://2pintsoftware.com https://twitter.com/AndHammarskjold From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: den 17 januari 2015 22:50 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Think I found a C++ reference somewhere… will have to look through the SDK again… From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Summers Sent: den 17 januari 2015 16:00 To: mssms Subject: Re: [mssms] Status Messages Reference You can (pseudo code) 500..5 | custom function for GetStatusMessage which is the output Sherry replied with. It only outputs the description template for each message id though. The 2007 spreadsheet from John is all I've been able to find that joins the message id with the component or list the attribute types. On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Andreas Hammarskjöld jun...@2pintsoftware.commailto:jun...@2pintsoftware.com wrote: Wasnt there some code floating around that pulled them all out of the the .dlls? Seem to remember that… From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Summers Sent: den 17 januari 2015 00:15 To: mssms Subject: Re: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Anyone know if there's any status attributes higher than 427? My db doesn't have but want to double check. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Christopher Summers ch...@csfanclub.commailto:ch...@csfanclub.com wrote: Thank you Sherry, I'll compare it to what I pulled with Powershell. Was hoping to have something that includes the component as well. I'll probably finish having it all mapped out this weekend and I'll share the results. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Sherry Kissinger slkissin...@sbcglobal.netmailto:slkissin...@sbcglobal.net wrote: The attached is from someone @Microsoft, who used the SDK and powershell, to create it. For CM12 R2 CU3 He confirmed it was OK to share publicly. On Friday, January 16, 2015 2:05 PM, Christopher Summers ch...@csfanclub.commailto:ch...@csfanclub.com wrote: Anyone have access to the full list of current status messages? Latest I've found is John Nelson's 2007 SP2 spreadsheet. -- Regards, Christopher Summers http://www.myitforum.com/csummers311 -- Regards, Christopher Summers http://www.myitforum.com/csummers311 -- Regards, Christopher Summers http://www.myitforum.com/csummers311 -- Regards, Christopher Summers http://www.myitforum.com/csummers311
RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference
Brilliant :) Now how about same for STATE messages :) From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: 20 January 2015 11:52 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Thats the one. :) //A From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Russ Rimmerman Sent: den 20 januari 2015 04:52 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Here’s a Powershell method to retrieve them http://blogs.technet.com/b/saudm/archive/2015/01/20/enumerating-status-message-strings-in-powershell.aspx From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 1:30 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Found it, I could create a small tool that sucks out all the standard MS messages ID’s if that would be of use to people? I bet the DLL’s have a lot of old stuff in them that is not in use any more though, so unsure how beneficial that would be? //A http://2pintsoftware.com https://twitter.com/AndHammarskjold From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: den 17 januari 2015 22:50 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Think I found a C++ reference somewhere… will have to look through the SDK again… From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Summers Sent: den 17 januari 2015 16:00 To: mssms Subject: Re: [mssms] Status Messages Reference You can (pseudo code) 500..5 | custom function for GetStatusMessage which is the output Sherry replied with. It only outputs the description template for each message id though. The 2007 spreadsheet from John is all I've been able to find that joins the message id with the component or list the attribute types. On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Andreas Hammarskjöld jun...@2pintsoftware.com mailto:jun...@2pintsoftware.com wrote: Wasnt there some code floating around that pulled them all out of the the .dlls? Seem to remember that… From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com ] On Behalf Of Christopher Summers Sent: den 17 januari 2015 00:15 To: mssms Subject: Re: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Anyone know if there's any status attributes higher than 427? My db doesn't have but want to double check. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Christopher Summers ch...@csfanclub.com mailto:ch...@csfanclub.com wrote: Thank you Sherry, I'll compare it to what I pulled with Powershell. Was hoping to have something that includes the component as well. I'll probably finish having it all mapped out this weekend and I'll share the results. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Sherry Kissinger slkissin...@sbcglobal.net mailto:slkissin...@sbcglobal.net wrote: The attached is from someone @Microsoft, who used the SDK and powershell, to create it. For CM12 R2 CU3 He confirmed it was OK to share publicly. On Friday, January 16, 2015 2:05 PM, Christopher Summers ch...@csfanclub.com mailto:ch...@csfanclub.com wrote: Anyone have access to the full list of current status messages? Latest I've found is John Nelson's 2007 SP2 spreadsheet. -- Regards, Christopher Summers http://www.myitforum.com/csummers311 -- Regards, Christopher Summers http://www.myitforum.com/csummers311 -- Regards, Christopher Summers http://www.myitforum.com/csummers311 -- Regards, Christopher Summers http://www.myitforum.com/csummers311
RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference
Should follow the same logic, just different DLL’s. //A http://2pintsoftware.com From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: den 20 januari 2015 13:20 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Brilliant ☺ Now how about same for STATE messages ☺ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: 20 January 2015 11:52 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Thats the one. ☺ //A From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Russ Rimmerman Sent: den 20 januari 2015 04:52 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Here’s a Powershell method to retrieve them http://blogs.technet.com/b/saudm/archive/2015/01/20/enumerating-status-message-strings-in-powershell.aspx From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 1:30 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Found it, I could create a small tool that sucks out all the standard MS messages ID’s if that would be of use to people? I bet the DLL’s have a lot of old stuff in them that is not in use any more though, so unsure how beneficial that would be? //A http://2pintsoftware.com https://twitter.com/AndHammarskjold From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: den 17 januari 2015 22:50 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Think I found a C++ reference somewhere… will have to look through the SDK again… From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Summers Sent: den 17 januari 2015 16:00 To: mssms Subject: Re: [mssms] Status Messages Reference You can (pseudo code) 500..5 | custom function for GetStatusMessage which is the output Sherry replied with. It only outputs the description template for each message id though. The 2007 spreadsheet from John is all I've been able to find that joins the message id with the component or list the attribute types. On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Andreas Hammarskjöld jun...@2pintsoftware.commailto:jun...@2pintsoftware.com wrote: Wasnt there some code floating around that pulled them all out of the the .dlls? Seem to remember that… From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Summers Sent: den 17 januari 2015 00:15 To: mssms Subject: Re: [mssms] Status Messages Reference Anyone know if there's any status attributes higher than 427? My db doesn't have but want to double check. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Christopher Summers ch...@csfanclub.commailto:ch...@csfanclub.com wrote: Thank you Sherry, I'll compare it to what I pulled with Powershell. Was hoping to have something that includes the component as well. I'll probably finish having it all mapped out this weekend and I'll share the results. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Sherry Kissinger slkissin...@sbcglobal.netmailto:slkissin...@sbcglobal.net wrote: The attached is from someone @Microsoft, who used the SDK and powershell, to create it. For CM12 R2 CU3 He confirmed it was OK to share publicly. On Friday, January 16, 2015 2:05 PM, Christopher Summers ch...@csfanclub.commailto:ch...@csfanclub.com wrote: Anyone have access to the full list of current status messages? Latest I've found is John Nelson's 2007 SP2 spreadsheet. -- Regards, Christopher Summers http://www.myitforum.com/csummers311 -- Regards, Christopher Summers http://www.myitforum.com/csummers311 -- Regards, Christopher Summers http://www.myitforum.com/csummers311 -- Regards, Christopher Summers http://www.myitforum.com/csummers311
RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up
select SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client from SMS_R_System where datediff(day,CreationDate,getdate()) 1 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of sccmfun Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:37 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up Follow-up on this. What if you are re-imaging a machine? If the machine was discovered when it was created a month ago by System Discovery, it won't show-up in the collection of new machines. How do you get around something like this? From: sccmfun [mailto:sccm...@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:58 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Cool, both good suggestions. Thanks From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gilmanov, Nile Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:10 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Or do a query on what's NOT in a patch collection and then run stuff against that data. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 11:53 AM To: mssms@lists.myITforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myITforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection You could do a query for creation date From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of sccmfun Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:52 AM To: mssms@lists.myITforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myITforum.com Subject: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Just wondering what have others done to get newly built machines into patching collections. We're using MDT (not integrated yet) and have the SCCM client get installed during the MDT build. How do you ensure that the newly built machines get into the patching collections quickly so they are patched during build time? Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.
RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up
If you re-image a machine, are the latest updates injected in the WIM or perhaps advertised toward the unknown or osd deployment collection, etc? That way the updates should be installed at build time. If not, perhaps a compliance setting that checks the status and compliance state for updates. Then you could have the non-compliant machines populated with query based collection. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh948616.aspx Mike D- From: sccm...@hotmail.com To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:36:34 -0500 Follow-up on this. What if you are re-imaging a machine? If the machine was discovered when it was created a month ago by System Discovery, it won’t show-up in the collection of new machines. How do you get around something like this? From: sccmfun [mailto:sccm...@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:58 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Cool, both good suggestions. Thanks From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gilmanov, Nile Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:10 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Or do a query on what’s NOT in a patch collection and then run stuff against that data. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 11:53 AM To: mssms@lists.myITforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection You could do a query for creation date From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of sccmfun Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:52 AM To: mssms@lists.myITforum.com Subject: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Just wondering what have others done to get newly built machines into patching collections. We’re using MDT (not integrated yet) and have the SCCM client get installed during the MDT build. How do you ensure that the newly built machines get into the patching collections quickly so they are patched during build time? Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up
Follow-up on this. What if you are re-imaging a machine? If the machine was discovered when it was created a month ago by System Discovery, it won't show-up in the collection of new machines. How do you get around something like this? From: sccmfun [mailto:sccm...@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:58 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Cool, both good suggestions. Thanks From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gilmanov, Nile Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:10 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Or do a query on what's NOT in a patch collection and then run stuff against that data. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 11:53 AM To: mssms@lists.myITforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection You could do a query for creation date From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of sccmfun Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:52 AM To: mssms@lists.myITforum.com Subject: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Just wondering what have others done to get newly built machines into patching collections. We're using MDT (not integrated yet) and have the SCCM client get installed during the MDT build. How do you ensure that the newly built machines get into the patching collections quickly so they are patched during build time? _ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. _ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up
Also set a high coll refresh on this, maybe 30 minutes. It's not a big hit either and it works quite well. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:25 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up select SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client from SMS_R_System where datediff(day,CreationDate,getdate()) 1 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of sccmfun Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:37 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up Follow-up on this. What if you are re-imaging a machine? If the machine was discovered when it was created a month ago by System Discovery, it won't show-up in the collection of new machines. How do you get around something like this? From: sccmfun [mailto:sccm...@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:58 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Cool, both good suggestions. Thanks From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gilmanov, Nile Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:10 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Or do a query on what's NOT in a patch collection and then run stuff against that data. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 11:53 AM To: mssms@lists.myITforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myITforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection You could do a query for creation date From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of sccmfun Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:52 AM To: mssms@lists.myITforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myITforum.com Subject: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Just wondering what have others done to get newly built machines into patching collections. We're using MDT (not integrated yet) and have the SCCM client get installed during the MDT build. How do you ensure that the newly built machines get into the patching collections quickly so they are patched during build time? Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract. Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.
[mssms] Wish there was a way to control BITS
Oh man... as my dear old friend Eduardo would say... I sure wish there was a way to control BITS from the server side... Maybe fairy godmother, Cinderella, Santa or even Mary censoredhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=291kT7LvQ0k Poppins could come up with something? Best wishes, Someone who ate their porridge every day.
[mssms] Transactional replication of CM database
There's a push here to enable transactional replication of the ConfigMgr database for an enterprise reporting project. I just wanted to know if transactional replication of the database is supported, any adverse effects I should be aware of and if anyone has some recommended reading for me to get a further understanding. Daniel. * This email, including any attachment, is confidential to the intended recipient. It may also be privileged and may be subject to copyright. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of the email. Any confidentiality or privilege is not waived. Neither the Council nor the sender warrant that this email does not contain any viruses or other unsolicited items. This email is an informal Council communication. The Council only accepts responsibility for information sent under official letterhead and duly signed by, or on behalf of, the Chief Executive Officer. Privacy Collection Notice Logan City Council may collect your personal information, e.g. name, residential address, phone number etc, in order to conduct its business and/or meet its statutory obligations. The information will only be accessed by employees and/or Councillors of Logan City Council for Council business related activities only. If your personal information will be passed onto a third party, Council will advise you of this disclosure, the purpose of the disclosure and reason why. Your information will not be given to any other person or agency unless you have given us permission or we are required by law.
RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up
If history of that machine is not important, delete machine from SCCM before re-image. That should create new record in SCCM after re-image and creation date will be also be new, so it will fall in to new machines collection. Anand From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of sccmfun Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 2:40 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up It the machine has been re-imaged, and was created a month ago it wouldn't show up in the collection since it's a re-image. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:46 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up Also set a high coll refresh on this, maybe 30 minutes. It's not a big hit either and it works quite well. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:25 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up select SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client from SMS_R_System where datediff(day,CreationDate,getdate()) 1 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of sccmfun Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:37 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up Follow-up on this. What if you are re-imaging a machine? If the machine was discovered when it was created a month ago by System Discovery, it won't show-up in the collection of new machines. How do you get around something like this? From: sccmfun [mailto:sccm...@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:58 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Cool, both good suggestions. Thanks From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gilmanov, Nile Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:10 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Or do a query on what's NOT in a patch collection and then run stuff against that data. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 11:53 AM To: mssms@lists.myITforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myITforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection You could do a query for creation date From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of sccmfun Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:52 AM To: mssms@lists.myITforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myITforum.com Subject: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection Just wondering what have others done to get newly built machines into patching collections. We're using MDT (not integrated yet) and have the SCCM client get installed during the MDT build. How do you ensure that the newly built machines get into the patching collections quickly so they are patched during build time? Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing
[mssms] RE: Wish there was a way to control BITS
Interesting From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:41 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Wish there was a way to control BITS I know natin', I am from Barcelona! //A http://2pintsoftware.com/stifler-bits-bandwidth-throttling/ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Phil Wilcock Sent: den 20 januari 2015 19:56 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Wish there was a way to control BITS Careful Junior... http://youtu.be/yfl6Lu3xQW0 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: 20 January 2015 18:20 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Wish there was a way to control BITS Oh man... as my dear old friend Eduardo would say... I sure wish there was a way to control BITS from the server side... Maybe fairy godmother, Cinderella, Santa or even Mary censoredhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=291kT7LvQ0k Poppins could come up with something? Best wishes, Someone who ate their porridge every day. This e-mail message and any attached files transmitted with it, from Loomis is intended solely for the use of named recipient(s) to whom this e-mail message is addressed. It may be privileged and confidential, is provided without warranty, and does not offer to or create a contract or amendment to any existing contract. If you are not an intended recipient, you are notified that reviewing, disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone or e-mail and delete the original message. E-mail is susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only send and receive e-mails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any consequences thereof. Thank you.
Re: [mssms] Transactional replication of CM database
Transactional replication of the site database is only supported for the MP role. This is so because only a subset of the site database is used by an MP, and not the entire database. Consider using Log Shipping instead - https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms151224.aspx Sent from my iPhone On Jan 20, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Corkill, Daniel danielcork...@logan.qld.gov.aumailto:danielcork...@logan.qld.gov.au wrote: There's a push here to enable transactional replication of the ConfigMgr database for an enterprise reporting project. I just wanted to know if transactional replication of the database is supported, any adverse effects I should be aware of and if anyone has some recommended reading for me to get a further understanding. Daniel. * This email, including any attachment, is confidential to the intended recipient. It may also be privileged and may be subject to copyright. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of the email. Any confidentiality or privilege is not waived. Neither the Council nor the sender warrant that this email does not contain any viruses or other unsolicited items. This email is an informal Council communication. The Council only accepts responsibility for information sent under official letterhead and duly signed by, or on behalf of, the Chief Executive Officer. Privacy Collection Notice Logan City Council may collect your personal information, e.g. name, residential address, phone number etc, in order to conduct its business and/or meet its statutory obligations. The information will only be accessed by employees and/or Councillors of Logan City Council for Council business related activities only. If your personal information will be passed onto a third party, Council will advise you of this disclosure, the purpose of the disclosure and reason why. Your information will not be given to any other person or agency unless you have given us permission or we are required by law. Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.
RE: [mssms] RE: Report on which boundary the client is in
Right click tools for Client Information module works only when client is online (ping happens) .For report,you should try to manipulate the below SQL Views to obtain the required information. vSMS_BoundaryGroup--stores information about boundary groupsvSMS_Boundary--stores informtion about boundaryv_GS_NETWORK_ADAPTER_CONFIGURATION--stores information about IP address . but if you go with reports,am not sure if you get right information since,each machine may have multiple IP address (when they move to new subnet /Roaming) stored in DB ,and one client can be part of 2 or more boundary/boundary groups due to roaming. Take a look at the powershell script (Device - Client Information.ps1) from Now Micro tools how it works with WQL Query. RegardsEswar Koneti www.eskonr.com From: james.beards...@dhgllp.com To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Report on which boundary the client is in Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:01:24 + I don’t know about a report but I know Now Micro’s Right Click Tools allows you to see which boundary a client falls into under the Client Tools - Client Information module From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Matt T Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 11:09 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Report on which boundary the client is in We’re setup using a combination of IP address and subnet boundaries. Is it possible to put together a report that would link a client to the boundary that it falls in based on the IP address of the client? There seems to be a burning desire to have this information for other various reports and tasks, since our boundary descriptions would provide the office location of a machine. This message is intended for the sole use of the addressee, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete this message. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please reply to the sender listed above immediately and permanently delete this message from your inbox. Thank you for your cooperation.
[mssms] RE: Wish there was a way to control BITS
I know natin', I am from Barcelona! //A http://2pintsoftware.com/stifler-bits-bandwidth-throttling/ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Phil Wilcock Sent: den 20 januari 2015 19:56 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Wish there was a way to control BITS Careful Junior... http://youtu.be/yfl6Lu3xQW0 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: 20 January 2015 18:20 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Wish there was a way to control BITS Oh man... as my dear old friend Eduardo would say... I sure wish there was a way to control BITS from the server side... Maybe fairy godmother, Cinderella, Santa or even Mary censoredhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=291kT7LvQ0k Poppins could come up with something? Best wishes, Someone who ate their porridge every day.
