RE: [mssms] RE: Question on migration

2016-10-18 Thread Kent, Mark
istsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 11:00 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Question on migration Yes, although restoring to a newer version of SQL is supposed to work as well – can’t say I’ve tried that though. Also, the server name

RE: [mssms] RE: Question on migration

2016-10-07 Thread Jason Sandys
it’s supported to change that now but I wouldn’t open that box). J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Mawdsley R. Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 9:14 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Question on migration Ok that’s

RE: [mssms] RE: Question on migration

2016-10-07 Thread Mawdsley R.
] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys Sent: 07 October 2016 14:17 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Question on migration Generally, yes. It’s faster and easier and you have an easy fallback method as well. Also, you get to test your DR procedures (which I’m sure you’ve tested many

Re: [mssms] RE: Question on migration

2016-10-07 Thread Jason Sandys
r 7, 2016 at 3:44 AM To: "mssms@lists.myitforum.com" Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Question on migration Because that’s how it was configured when I got here! ☺ So you would recommend I setup the new infrastructure and then restore to it, instead of a migration then? Rich From:

RE: [mssms] RE: Question on migration

2016-10-07 Thread Mawdsley R.
13:54 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Question on migration Those would be separate operations just like they are today; neither overly difficult either. Why would you separate your SQL Server though? That’s a [very] bad idea in general: https

Re: [mssms] RE: Question on migration

2016-10-06 Thread Jason Sandys
Those would be separate operations just like they are today; neither overly difficult either. Why would you separate your SQL Server though? That’s a [very] bad idea in general: https://stevethompsonmvp.wordpress.com/2014/12/20/why-you-should-not-use-remote-sql-server-with-configmgr-2012/ J F

RE: [mssms] RE: Question on migration

2016-10-05 Thread Jim Walker
: Question on migration Then I for one would tell you to stand up a new primary site (with no CAS anywhere) with a site code of ASB (Ah, Sweet Bliss); and migrate everything over and break and throw out your cas + primaries. On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:37 PM, John Hamilton mailto:john.hamil...@ftsi.com

Re: [mssms] RE: Question on migration

2016-10-05 Thread Sherry Kissinger
Then I for one would tell you to stand up a new primary site (with no CAS anywhere) with a site code of ASB (Ah, Sweet Bliss); and migrate everything over and break and throw out your cas + primaries. On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:37 PM, John Hamilton wrote: > What if you have a CAS? /duckingforco

Re: [mssms] RE: Question on migration

2016-10-05 Thread Sherry Kissinger
I was just about to write something similar to Jason. Upgrade the OS (patch it up, reboots in between everywhere you think you need them) and wait a few days making sure everything is good. Upgrade SQL to the latest Supported version for CM12 R2 SP1. Again, wait a day or two (don't need that muc