AHeh, but now I can't play midi-files at all. Say (hypothetical situation), I
download a midi file off the web with... Uzix or something. Currently, I
can't play it on my msx at all!! (ok, ok, that's a big loss :)). Anyways,
it's still better to be able to at least listen to them, even though
Hi All,
This is an automated email containing a report of new or changed files at the MSX
directory of ftp.funet.fi since the last 30 days.
The Funet MSX archive is accessible in two ways:
ftp: use an FTP client to connect to ftp://ftp.funet.fi and go to the /pub/msx
directory.
www: browse
I quote: I've wondered and tried in the past
The 'tried' would probably have been your program :)
~Grauw
- Original Message -
From: Jun Sung Kim (???) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 5:14 AM
Subject: Re: [MSX] Inventarisation of Moonsound users
lacks volume-ramping (meaning that you hear ticks between notes on
the same channel).
Voltage-ramping sounds great, and 24 channels are definately enough imho.
voltage ramping? :)
bah... :) volume.
well, mainly I'm using more channels to prevent those ticks, and to make
it
sound
channels. There's a world of difference when you use a NNA-type system.
That would require a lot of channels though... Wouldn't it be easier to, for
example, fade out a channel at a really high speed right before the next
note instead?
depends on what channels you mean, internal channels
channels. There's a world of difference when you use a NNA-type
system.
That would require a lot of channels though... Wouldn't it be easier to,
for
example, fade out a channel at a really high speed right before the next
note instead?
depends on what channels you mean, internal
