Laurens Holst wrote:
I don't think you can program 'parts of' the FPGA, you have to program it
as a whole in one go.
No not necessarily. Hans Oranje told me this, and I saw it on one of
Tsujikawa's designs: The FPGA gets its information directly from a
FlashROM. Change something in the
Hi,
] I think it's strange the computer runs on Linux. First, as far as I know Linux
] is a Unix-clone for IBM-compatibles. The one-chip-msx is not an IBM-compatible.
Linux started-off as a 386 Unix clone. But soon it also got ported to other
architectures. These days it runs on every major
Very true; there was even a Linux port for the SH-4 processor, intended for
Dreamcast. One website actually has as its server a Dreamcast running Linux!
Original Message Follows
Linux started-off as a 386 Unix clone. But soon it also got ported to other
architectures. These days it runs
I had some doubts about Nishi's presentation though... I have the feeling
that he wants to 'market' his one-chip-solution by using the MSX 'brand' as
marketing point (especially in Japan).. It's great so see efforts to improve
FMSX though and any attempt to survive (keep nearly alive) MSX
On Sunday 22 April 2001 10:08, you wrote:
intent by the way is just a uniform os which runs java code.
so it's machine-independant.
Intent also has its own virtual machine, AFAIK. It's optimized for
multimedia, which is an area where Java is not strong.
Actually I'm more exited about that
Bush 'invented' the internet (or was it Gore?). And Gates also 'invented'
lots of stuff...
That was (wasn't) Gore. I doubt Bush ever invented anything...
no. he's too narrow-minded for that.
(sorry I think I just vented a political opinion).
yess! why waste transistors (hence speed and
