ROBOTZ

And that project, that program-driven game, ROBOTZ? Ricardo Jurczyk Pinheiro - ICQ UIN:3635907 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]|_Sola Scriptura | http://i.am/rjp -M.Sc. Numerical Modelling (hope so!) |_ Sola Gratia

Re: ROBOTZ

Hey guys, how are the Robotz project? Ehm - I'm kinda busy at work nowadays, and hardly having any spare time :-( But I'll continue ASAP, promised! Eric MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put in the body (not subject) "unsubscrib

ROBOTZ

Hey guys, how are the Robotz project? Ricardo Jurczyk Pinheiro - ICQ UIN:3635907 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]|_Sola Scriptura | http://i.am/rjp -M.Sc. Numerical Modelling (hope so!) |_ Sola Gratia | UFF - Niteroi - RJ

Re: Robotz

Hi! About the robotz.txt v0.0 file: 2.2 Status Registers The registers are divided into two classes: public and private. The private registers can only be accessed by the robot itself, the public registers are accessible to all other robots Also mention that they are _status_ registers and

Re[2]: Robotz

Hi! Hard-wireing the robot location to (2,2) is not flexible. If you would allow negative indices, you could place the robot at (0,0) and expand the scanner range with a lot less problems. Placing the robot at (2,2) was indeed an attempt to avoid negative indices. Putting the robot back to

Re: Robotz 0.2

At 12:06 PM 1/5/99 +, you wrote: bit 0 or 1, FALSE or TRUE You mean FALSE = 0 and TRUE = 1? I should kill the "FALSE or TRUE" part here, I guess... Actuallt, I'd like any non 0 value to be TRUE :-) byte signed or unsigned 8-bit value This vague "signed or unsigned" will cause

Re: Robotz - v 0.3

Hi, Add that signed numbers are stored in two's complement format. Agree. Consider it done. Have you looked yet at the possibility of integrating the two stacks? Yes. But only after I put version 0.3 online :-) To integrate the two stacks is not that difficult, but it complicates

Robotz 0.2

Hello all, I hereby send version 0.2 of the ROBOTZ specification into the MSX world. The arithmatic and logical/bit operations are still to be filled out, but I've elaborated the rest of the document, embedded some suggestions and other comments (thanks, Maarten :-)) and introduced META's (my

Re: Robotz 0.2

shevek wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The ATCK command makes the robot attack another robot at a neighbouring square. What if there is no robot in that square? Is the empty square attacked or is there no attack at all? Since attacking costs a

Re: Robotz 0.2

And a very good day to you, too :-) No, both drop and atck have as a parameter the amount of energie to use. Ehm... not yet :-) ATCK is only specified with the direction in which to attack as parameter. For DROP, no direction is specified - I assumed that DROP would drop the energy on the

Re: Robotz 0.2

On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Laurens Holst wrote: And a very good day to you, too :-) No, both drop and atck have as a parameter the amount of energie to use. Ehm... not yet :-) ATCK is only specified with the direction in which to attack as parameter. For DROP, no direction is specified - I

Re: Robotz 0.2

On Wed, 6 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The ATCK command makes the robot attack another robot at a neighbouring square. What if there is no robot in that square? Is the empty square attacked or is there no attack at all? Since attacking costs a turn, there is a

Re: Robotz

someone told to me that exists a beta version of robotz, if yes I'm very interested in beta testing of it. Sorry to disappoint you, but till now, only a beta version of the _specification_ exists :-) I mailed it on the list some days ago. I think I can release version 0.3 (of the spec!) next

R: Robotz

Thanks a lot, good work, Stefano -Messaggio originale- Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: msx [EMAIL PROTECTED] Data: martedì 12 gennaio 1999 11.58 Oggetto: Re: Robotz someone told to me that exists a beta version of robotz, if yes I'm very interested in beta testing

R: Robotz

Well done, I'm going to read it suddenly ! Bye Stefano --- Fronteddu Stefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://space.tin.it/computer/stfront MSX, Sardinia, Robotics, Friends http://computer.digiland.it/1461 MSX Soft Tips Page ICQ: 21401454 0338/3645458 MSX

Robotz

Hi to all, someone told to me that exists a beta version of robotz, if yes I'm very interested in beta testing of it. Mail it to me ! Thanks a lot good work ! Bye Stefano --- Fronteddu Stefano Student in Software Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://space.tin.it

Re: Robotz 0.2

The ATCK command makes the robot attack another robot at a neighbouring square. What if there is no robot in that square? Is the empty square attacked or is there no attack at all? Since attacking costs a turn, there is a difference. IMHO, the empty square should be

Re: Robotz 0.2

Syntax: ATCK The ATCK command makes the robot attack another robot at a neighbouring square. What if there is no robot in that square? Is the empty square attacked or is there no attack at all? Since attacking costs a turn, there is a difference. IMHO, the empty square

Re: Robotz 0.2

The problem is that I don't know if it suffices to define only signed values. (Only unsigned values definitely won't...) I think signed only is good enough. Why would a simple robot need numbers bigger than 32767? (Which is quite a lot, come to think of it, maybe I should limit it to 14

Re: Robotz 0.2

At 12:06 PM 1/5/99 +, you wrote: I hereby send version 0.2 of the ROBOTZ specification into the MSX world. 1.2 Terminology, definitions and abbreviations -- bit 0 or 1, FALSE or TRUE You mean FALSE = 0 and TRUE = 1? byte signed

Re: Robotz - v 0.3

At 06:43 PM 1/18/99 +, you wrote: byte signed 8-bit value word signed 16-bit value, LSB-first Add that signed numbers are stored in two's complement format. The machine has two stacks. One for calculations and parameter passing (a-stack) and one for storing return