Ciao,
Did you check the MSX FAQ? There should be some info on floppydrive
connectors
See: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
I look in this page, but what is the right section?
The connector section?
I look into it there isn't the right connection. Do u know if it is the
same of Turbo-R?
There is some news at
http://www.chiba-net.or.jp/~nf_ban/gigamix/ese/esedsp.html
But it is in japanese.
Giovanni dos Reis Nunes wrote:
Nestor,
Someone knows what happened with the ESE-DSP project? Since last
summer I heard no further information...
The last information that
I was wondering who of you guys are going to the fair in Tilburg?
Actually I am only
interested knowing about the (old)-sceners. (like RMF/Fuzzy
Logic/Fony/Moonsoft/etc)
Well, as a matter o' fact, an old scener named HeXx is coming to Tilburg too.. He was
a former member of Future Magazine...
Hello msx freaks,
Does anyone know if I still can upgrade my video chip
in a PHILIPS NMS 8255
and implant a z80 b proccesor(6Mhz)?
What does that cost?
Oh I'm going to the msx fair in Tilburg
So can I Upgrade it there?
Jeroen Nijdam
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an
Hi
When I DOSSCAN a DD disk formatted on PC, I get about 12 or 13 kB/s, but when
I DOSSCAN a DD disk formatted on my MSX, I get 16 or 17 kB/s!
Can anyone explain me the difference, exactly?
Thanks!
Grtjs, Manuel
PS: MSX 4 EVER! (Questions? See: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/)
PPS: Visit my
The PC has a HD floppy drive and it just costs time to read from DD
floppies instead of HD floppies... it has to do al sorts of
conversion routines etc.etc. The MSX however is optimized
to work with the DD disks.. hence the difference
Are the disks not both read on MSX? If the PC has to
The PC has a HD floppy drive and it just costs time to read from DD
floppies instead of HD floppies... it has to do al sorts of
conversion routines etc.etc. The MSX however is optimized
to work with the DD disks.. hence the difference
Are the disks not both read on MSX? If the PC
] Is the track formatted with an other interleaving setting ?
]
] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
]
] or
]
] 1 3 5 7 9 2 4 6 8
]
] Or the PC is optimized for an other interleaving setting than the MSX is.
I agree on this explanation. You can doublecheck this theory by analyzing the
track with some kind
] Is the track formatted with an other interleaving setting ?
]
] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
]
] or
]
] 1 3 5 7 9 2 4 6 8
]
] Or the PC is optimized for an other interleaving setting than the MSX is.
I agree on this explanation. You can doublecheck this theory by analyzing the
track with
Fony is present at the fair :-)
Maybe TFH too?
But he can speak for himself I guess
Stephan
-Original Message-
From: Bart Schouten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: woensdag 14 april 1999 11:42
Subject: Msx Fair Tilburg
Yo guys,
I was wondering who of
YES !
Of course I will be there What did you think !!! I need to be there to
terrorise all of you !
Greetz,
TFH...
Go visit the MSX Emulator Page (M.E.P.)
http://www.mep.msxnet.org
http://surf.to/msxemu
http://www.casema.net/~tfh
ICQ:1446
- Original Message -
From:
well , it's not that.
in the past i have done some checking on this strange behavior (when i was writing
the supercop software) and MSX and PC do not use interleaving
the main difference is the gap size. this is the space between 2 sectors
msx gap size is bigger so the computer has more time to
Erik,
when the gap size is too small (and he is on a pc formatted disk) he
sometimes have to make a complete rotation for the next sector
But with a small gap do I gain more disk space, don't I?
If not, what is the advantage of having a small gap if, in some
cases (as
I don't know why pc uses a small gap , the only reason i can think of
is that the start and end gap (the area in witch the index pulse must appear) will
be bigger
so you can use diskdrives with a wider tolerance
btw.
(there is so many space on a track you can put 10 sectors on it with a very
Cas Cremers schrieb:
Task: approximation in assembler to
- a = sqrt ( b*b + c*c ) let's call it sentence of p...
[...cut...]
p:= max(a,b)+0.25*min(a,b)
[...cut...]
Cas Cremers
He - thanx a lot! Exactly what I have been searching for!
greetz
JJoS
--
Tilburg Team: Janosch, SGI,
- a = sqrt ( b*b + c*c ) let's call it sentence of p...
[...cut...]
p:= max(a,b)+0.25*min(a,b)
[...cut...]
Erm ofcourse I meant a:=max(b,c)+0.25*min(b,c) and it ends up like this:
|[
;we want a=min and c=max...
ld a,b
cp c
jr c,noswap
;apparently, cb, so we
Hi,
Today I did connect an external FDD used in laptops to my MSX2. These
drives have only a 26-pin connector. Here goes the cable schematics.
Somebody may put it in a MSX hardware page...
pin at FDD connector (26) pin at MSX drive interface conn.(34)signal
17 matches
Mail list logo
