Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

I did specifically ask for dancing bears. ;-) On Apr 22, 2009, at 10:58 AM, Ethan Mallove wrote: Dancing bears on slide 1. We're off to a good start. -Ethan On Wed, Apr/22/2009 09:11:57AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > The slides will also be on webex on the call tomorrow. Use the URL to join >

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

Dancing bears on slide 1. We're off to a good start. -Ethan On Wed, Apr/22/2009 09:11:57AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > The slides will also be on webex on the call tomorrow. Use the URL to join > the meeting in the email invite that you got. That URL will launch an > application thingy for the

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

The slides will also be on webex on the call tomorrow. Use the URL to join the meeting in the email invite that you got. That URL will launch an application thingy for the web portion of the meeting, and it will prompt you for a phone number to call you to join the audio portion of the

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

Hello guys, Here is a small ppt with MTToGDS summary for tomorrow`s meeting. regards Mike On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Will there be dancing bears on the slides? I'll only accept slides with > dancing bears! > > ;-) > > (no need to be formal; if

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

Will there be dancing bears on the slides? I'll only accept slides with dancing bears! ;-) (no need to be formal; if slides help, great, otherwise don't make slides just because we have webex available) On Apr 16, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Mike Dubman wrote: I will prepare ppt with summary of

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

I will prepare ppt with summary of what were discussed and agreed, milestones, open questions and other thoughts. regards Mike On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Ok, I think we converged on a time: 9am US Eastern / 4pm Israel next > Thuesday, April 23. >

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

Ok, I think we converged on a time: 9am US Eastern / 4pm Israel next Thuesday, April 23. I'll send the webex invites in a separate email. Mike: if you have slides or other electronic material to show during the call, we can use webex for that. Otherwise, we can just use the telephone

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

I have been listening in on the thread, but have not had time to really look at much (which is why I have not been replying). I'm interested in listening in on the teleconf as well, though if I become a blocker for finding a time feel free to cut me out. Best, Josh On Apr 14, 2009, at

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Apr 15, 2009, at 1:45 PM, Mike Dubman wrote: > > yep. correct. We can define only static attributes (which we know for sure >> should present in every object of given type and leave phase specific >> attributes to

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Apr 15, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Mike Dubman wrote: > > Hmm. Ok, so you're saying that we define a "phase object" (for each >> phase) with all the fields that we expect to have, but if we need to, we can >> create fields on

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

On Apr 15, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Mike Dubman wrote: Hmm. Ok, so you're saying that we define a "phase object" (for each phase) with all the fields that we expect to have, but if we need to, we can create fields on the fly, and google will just "do the right thing" and associate *all* the data

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Apr 14, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Mike Dubman wrote: > > Ah, good point (python/java not perl). But I think that >> lib/MTT/Reporter/GoogleDataStore.pm could still be a good thing -- we have >> invested a lot of time/effort

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Ethan Mallove wrote: > On Tue, Apr/14/2009 09:27:14PM, Mike Dubman wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Jeff Squyres > wrote: > > > > On Apr 13, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Mike Dubman wrote: > > > >Hello

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

On Apr 14, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Mike Dubman wrote: Ah, good point (python/java not perl). But I think that lib/MTT/ Reporter/GoogleDataStore.pm could still be a good thing -- we have invested a lot of time/effort into getting our particular mtt clients setup just the way we want them, setting

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

On Tue, Apr/14/2009 09:27:14PM, Mike Dubman wrote: >On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > > On Apr 13, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Mike Dubman wrote: > >Hello Ethan, > > Sorry for joining the discussion late... I was on travel last week and >

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Apr 13, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Mike Dubman wrote: > > Hello Ethan, >> > > Sorry for joining the discussion late... I was on travel last week and that > always makes me waaay behind on my INBOX. :-( > > On Mon, Apr 13,

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

On Apr 13, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Mike Dubman wrote: Hello Ethan, Sorry for joining the discussion late... I was on travel last week and that always makes me waaay behind on my INBOX. :-( On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Ethan Mallove wrote: Will this translate to

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

Hello Ethan, On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Ethan Mallove wrote: > > Will this translate to something like > lib/MTT/Reporter/GoogleDatabase.pm? If we are to move away from the > current MTT Postgres database, we want to be able to submit results to > both the current

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

On Mon, Apr/13/2009 04:15:23PM, Mike Dubman wrote: >Hello Guys, > >Please comment on the proposed object model and flows. We will have 1-2 >ppl working on this in a 2-3w. Till that moment I would like to finalize >the scope and flows. > >Thanks > >Mike. > >On Mon,

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

Hello Guys, Please comment on the proposed object model and flows. We will have 1-2 ppl working on this in a 2-3w. Till that moment I would like to finalize the scope and flows. Thanks Mike. On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Mike Dubman wrote: > Hello Guys, > > I have

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

Hello Guys, I have played a bit with google datastore and here is a proposal for mtt DB infra and some accompanying tools for submission and querying: 1. Scope and requirements a. provide storage services for storing test results generated by mtt. Storage services will be

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

On Mar 23, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Ethan Mallove wrote: ---+-+-- Resource | Unit| Unit cost ---+-+-- Outgoing Bandwidth | gigabytes | $0.12 Incoming Bandwidth |

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

I'm playing with google datastore now and will send some proposal and thoughts. On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Yes, I think you're right -- making a "schema" for the datastore might be > quite easy. I'm on travel all this week and likely won't be

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

The next 2 weeks are pretty tight for me. I'll try to take a look at the API and send some comments as soon as I am able. -- Josh On Mar 23, 2009, at 8:33 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: Yes, I think you're right -- making a "schema" for the datastore might be quite easy. I'm on travel all this

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

Yes, I think you're right -- making a "schema" for the datastore might be quite easy. I'm on travel all this week and likely won't be able to look into this stuff -- can you guys post a proposal and we can dive into it from that angle? On Mar 22, 2009, at 6:48 AM, Mike Dubman wrote:

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

Hello guys, I`m not sure if we should preserve current DB schema, from one simple reason - datastore is an object oriented storage and have different rules and techniques then rdbms. The basic storage unit in the datastore is an object which can be saved, loaded and queried. (hadoop is based on

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

On Mar 20, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Josh Hursey wrote: Yeah I think this sounds like a good way to move forward with this work. The database schema is pretty complex. If you need help on the database side of things let me know. To get started, would it be useful to have a meeting over the phone/

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

Looks like there were 400 applications this year; they selected 150 -- 38%. We were in the unlucky 62%. Bummer. On Mar 18, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Ethan Mallove wrote: On Wed, Mar/18/2009 03:28:48PM, Josh Hursey wrote: > So they posted the list of accepted projects and we are -not- on it > for

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

On Wed, Mar/18/2009 03:28:48PM, Josh Hursey wrote: > So they posted the list of accepted projects and we are -not- on it > for this year: > > http://socghop.appspot.com/program/accepted_orgs/google/gsoc2009 > > Maybe next year. I don't know if they will be sending around a note > regarding why

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

So they posted the list of accepted projects and we are -not- on it for this year: http://socghop.appspot.com/program/accepted_orgs/google/gsoc2009 Maybe next year. I don't know if they will be sending around a note regarding why we were not selected to participate. If they do I will

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

Awesome; many thanks for carrying the baton over the finish line, Josh! On Mar 13, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Josh Hursey wrote: The application has been submitted. We find out on March 18 (3 pm) if we have been accepted. Link to timeline below:

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

You have to "module load osl merurial" in your shell startup files somewhere for hg to work on milliways. On Mar 13, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Ethan Mallove wrote: On Fri, Mar/13/2009 02:19:24PM, Josh Hursey wrote: > I just pushed a final draft to the repository. I'll probably plan on > submitting

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

The application has been submitted. We find out on March 18 (3 pm) if we have been accepted. Link to timeline below: http://socghop.appspot.com/document/show/program/google/gsoc2009/ timeline Cheers, Josh On Mar 13, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Josh Hursey wrote: I just pushed a final draft to the

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

I finished a first pass at cleaning up the Ideas page on the Wiki. All of the ideas were preserved, just some rewording and formatting. https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/mtt/wiki/MttNewFeaturesIdeas If you get a chance, read through this and make sure the text sounds ok (feel free to clean the

Re: [MTT devel] GSOC application

Jeff is going to take the first pass at the application. I am going to go through the Idea page on the wiki and polish a bit: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/mtt/wiki/MttNewFeaturesIdeas I'll let folks know when I'm done, and we can start iterating on drafts. Cheers, Josh On Mar 12, 2009, at

[MTT devel] GSOC application

I've created a quick-n-dirty hg to collaborate on the GSOC application. There's a web form to fill out to apply, so let's work on a .txt file in the hg to get it right. We have until 3pm US Eastern time tomorrow to submit. Here's the HG: ssh://www.open-mpi.org/~jsquyres/hg/gsoc/ I've