Armin Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 04.04.2005, 17:11:18:
> and i dont think that the choice of a toolkit should get religious. i
> think the choice depends on what you want to accomplish. since i would
> like to target several platforms in the long run, using gtk might prove
> difficult
Gonzalo Diethelm wrote:
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 16:32 +0200, Armin Bauer wrote:
Hum... "wid" == "when it's done"? Anyway, here I could probably try and
help (GUIs are not my strong suit anyway); is there any documentation
for how to write or port a plugin? Is there a "dummy" plugin that one
can ba
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 16:32 +0200, Armin Bauer wrote:
> >Hum... "wid" == "when it's done"? Anyway, here I could probably try and
> >help (GUIs are not my strong suit anyway); is there any documentation
> >for how to write or port a plugin? Is there a "dummy" plugin that one
> >can base a design on?
Gonzalo Diethelm wrote:
Hi Armin, thanks for answering.
the syncengine itself already has almost all the functionality of 0.8X
(and even more on some parts). The only things that missing is to make
the gui fully working again (ie connect the selectors for the object
types to synchronize, filt
Hi Armin, thanks for answering.
> the syncengine itself already has almost all the functionality of 0.8X
> (and even more on some parts). The only things that missing is to make
> the gui fully working again (ie connect the selectors for the object
> types to synchronize, filters etc) and the p
Gonzalo Diethelm wrote:
After lurking for a while, I would like to know the approximate road map
for multisync. I understand 0.8 (the current version) is going the way
of the dodo, and 0.9 (AKA opensync + interfaces) is the future. Is there
an established road map for 0.9? It would be great to know
After lurking for a while, I would like to know the approximate road map
for multisync. I understand 0.8 (the current version) is going the way
of the dodo, and 0.9 (AKA opensync + interfaces) is the future. Is there
an established road map for 0.9? It would be great to know, for example:
* when 0
On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 23:29 +0100, Armin Bauer wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 03:57, Dan Sawyer wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > This is a request for roadmap information. I am currently running FC2,
> > Evo 1.4.x, multisync .82, and Zaurus opie 1.1.7. The plan is to move to
> > FC3 and Evo 2 however the
On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 03:57, Dan Sawyer wrote:
> All,
>
> This is a request for roadmap information. I am currently running FC2,
> Evo 1.4.x, multisync .82, and Zaurus opie 1.1.7. The plan is to move to
> FC3 and Evo 2 however the current multisync does not support Evo 2. When
> is the planned
All,
This is a request for roadmap information. I am currently running FC2,
Evo 1.4.x, multisync .82, and Zaurus opie 1.1.7. The plan is to move to
FC3 and Evo 2 however the current multisync does not support Evo 2. When
is the planned release of Multisync support for Evo 2?
Thanks,
Dan
---
10 matches
Mail list logo
