[Multisync-users] 100% CPU

2004-09-15 Thread Paul D. Eden
I am trying out multisync 0.82 on fedora core 2. I am using the evolution and the palm conduits/modules. I am using irda to sync. The connection goes fine and the initial gathering of changes seems to work, but after a while it pegs the CPU and then a little later the connection to the handheld

Re: [Multisync-users] 100% CPU

2004-09-16 Thread Paul D. Eden
On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 03:58, Armin Bauer wrote: > On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 23:38, Paul D. Eden wrote: > > I am trying out multisync 0.82 on fedora core 2. I am using the > > evolution and the palm conduits/modules. I am using irda to sync. > > > > The connection goes fin

Re: [Multisync-users] 100% CPU

2004-09-16 Thread Paul D. Eden
On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 11:22, Armin Bauer wrote: [... snip ...] > ok. how many contacts are you trying to sync? > I suspect that you are syncing quite a lot, since when you stoped it, it > was in the process of adding changes to evo. > > I guess that while it was working on the evo side it somehow

Re: [Multisync-users] 100% CPU

2004-09-17 Thread Paul D. Eden
Here is the last bit of the output (end of last vcard shown). END:VALARM END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR [local] INFORMATION: Archieved [local] INFORMATION: Found a deleted record on palm: uid-DatebookDB-8730988 [local] DEBUG: Ping: Mutex locked! [local] INFORMATION: Archieved [local] INFORMATION:

Re: [Multisync-users] 100% CPU

2004-09-17 Thread Paul D. Eden
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 09:18, Armin Bauer wrote: [... snip ...] > > can you please tell how long it needs to get from here > > > < Note it started to ped the CPU right about here. > > > > > [local] INFORMATION: Successfully opened ToDoDB > > [local] INFORMATION: Found a deleted record on palm: