Here's a little illustration:
http://zwizwa.be/rai/rai.html
( Racket's documentation facility is really nice. )
On 05/14/2013 12:11 PM, Tom Schouten wrote:
Is there anyone here interested in Functional Programming and C code
generation for DSP code?
I'm working on a system for DSP code
For those interested, a short list of theoretical and general
considerations, as of course some of you know I'm hardly fresh to all
this, and recognize some of my PhD level considerations from long ago,
which were about parallelizing (why does my spell check complain on this
word ?! :) )
On 05/15/2013 04:54 AM, Jamie Bullock wrote:
On 15 May 2013, at 00:42, Tom Schoutent...@zwizwa.be wrote:
Faust is amazing. it can compile to many different end targets and even has
it's own IDE in FaustWorks. Also, Albert Graf has embedded it (of sorts) into
Pd already (via Pure). very
On 05/14/2013 11:12 PM, Alan Wolfe wrote:
fwiw, i have a DAW I work on, and on my todo list is the ability to
export your creations to C++.
what DAW is that?
One option would do generic C++ so you could drop it into whatever
program you wanted (like, an fmod callback, or custom code etc).
Is there anyone here interested in Functional Programming and C code
generation for DSP code?
I'm working on a system for DSP code development based on the principle
of Abstract Interpretation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_interpretation
Basically, it will allow several
Good choice of project. A generatively programmed codebase get's more powerful
for the programmer over time. The beginning is the slower and more difficult
part. This approach to programming holds great promise.
On 14-May-2013, at 9:41 PM, Tom Schouten t...@zwizwa.be wrote:
Is there anyone
Interested -- yes. Time to do anything -- no.
But, I have long thought it would be interesting to implement a
virtual modular synth that was compiled on the fly. The UI would be
written in high-level Haskell, and would allow you to manipulate the
synth, patching cables, tweaking knobs, etc. When
On 05/14/2013 12:17 PM, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
Good choice of project. A generatively programmed codebase get's more powerful
for the programmer over time. The beginning is the slower and more difficult
part. This approach to programming holds great promise.
Indeed.
Moreover, there is a lot to
On 05/14/2013 12:44 PM, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
Interested -- yes. Time to do anything -- no.
But, I have long thought it would be interesting to implement a
virtual modular synth that was compiled on the fly. The UI would be
written in high-level Haskell, and would allow you to manipulate the
i'm presuming everyone in this thread knows Grame's FAUST and Cycling 74's GEN
? or maybe i'm missing something about what you want to do? if so apologies.
i'm actually just very interested in this subject myself. surely the first step
would be to appraise two of the excellent solutions already
pdowling wrote:
i'm presuming everyone in this thread knows Grame's FAUST and Cycling 74's GEN
? or maybe i'm missing something about what you want to do? if so apologies.
i'm actually just very interested in this subject myself. surely the first step
would be to appraise two of the excellent
On 05/14/2013 04:30 PM, pdowling wrote:
i'm presuming everyone in this thread knows Grame's FAUST and Cycling 74's GEN
? or maybe i'm missing something about what you want to do? if so apologies.
i'm actually just very interested in this subject myself. surely the first step
would be to
fwiw, i have a DAW I work on, and on my todo list is the ability to
export your creations to C++.
One option would do generic C++ so you could drop it into whatever
program you wanted (like, an fmod callback, or custom code etc).
The other option to be generating code for a VST plugin.
Just
13 matches
Mail list logo
