Am 29.09.2017 um 02:48 schrieb gm:
Another idea is to alter the Go method as follows
instead of
Na mod 1 = a/2
Na mod 1 = a*0.618... and Na mod 1 = 1- a*0.382... respectively
Some observations:
It's the same as 1/(1 + 0.382..) for N=2
This seems to do what Fibonacci does, it fills the line
Another idea is to alter the Go method as follows
instead of
Na mod 1 = a/2
Na mod 1 = a*0.618... and Na mod 1 = 1- a*0.382... respectively
to get rid of the detuning procedure
a quick listening test seems promising, but I haven't investigated it in
depth yet
Now back to the orginal question, why doesn't the scheme that follows
the lagged Fibonacci generator achieve better results then my "Go" method?
Somehow the analogy between the simplified model
+-> [AP Diffusor AP1] -> [AP Diffusor Ap2] -> [Delay D] ->
|
