Hello Andrew.Yes as I already said I know the Mitra paper of the 75 but it
relates to linear networks. Of course I know the Italian guys (personally) and
to my knowledge they were the pioneers as far as the nonlinear systems are
concerned. I thought that there were references in the 70s t
Hi Andy,
Also, the purpose of a "reflection-free port" in wave digital filters
(WDF) was to eliminate delay-free loops. That probably goes back
earlier than 1975 since WDFs started in 1969.
- Julius
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Andrew Leary wrote:
> On Jul 25, 2015, at 12:25 AM, Marco Lo
On Jul 25, 2015, at 12:25 AM, Marco Lo Monaco wrote:
> Also you tell us that the delay free loop problem was initially faced in the
> 70s, which is something I didn't know. Do you have please any citation about
> it?
An important early reference is:
Szczupak, J. and Mitra, S.K., “Detection, Lo
Unless you consider the papers by Mitra et alias, but dealing only with linear
graphs computability…which are dated effectively in the 70s.
M.
Da: music-dsp [mailto:music-dsp-boun...@music.columbia.edu] Per conto di Marco
Lo Monaco
Inviato: sabato 25 luglio 2015 01:31
A: music-dsp@music.c
On 7/25/15 10:57 AM, Tom Duffy wrote:
You didn't change the bandwidth.
If the target signal is max 30Hz and you have a 192kHz sampler, you
low pass
at 2x your max frequency (60Hz, but lets say 100Hz for convenience) using
a brick wall digital filter (processed at 192kHz). Then you do a
down
You didn't change the bandwidth.
If the target signal is max 30Hz and you have a 192kHz sampler, you low pass
at 2x your max frequency (60Hz, but lets say 100Hz for convenience) using
a brick wall digital filter (processed at 192kHz). Then you do a
downsampling
of the signal from 192kHz to 10
On 25/07/2015, Peter S wrote:
> On 23/07/2015, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
>
>> depends on what we have available for sample rates. essentially we are
>> only limited by the laws in Information Theory. if i have a 192 kHz
>> system and i only need to measure a 30 Hz waveform, there is a lot i c
Okay, a few more thoughts:
On 23/07/2015, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> okay, since there is no processing, just passing the signal from A/D to
> D/A converter, there is only one quantization operation, at the A/D.
That's only true *if* it's a non-dithered converter (read: a converter
from the
