Re: [music-dsp] list archives not updating?

.edu/pipermail/music-dsp/ > > but apparently the real one is here in the email. > > maybe we should update that first link or something? not a biggie > though obviously :P > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Douglas Repetto > <doug...@music.columbia.edu> wrote: > > We s

Re: [music-dsp] list archives not updating?

We switched to a new server a year ago. The footer at the bottom of each email has the correct address for the archives: https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp best, douglas On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Alan Wolfe wrote: > It looks like it stopped

Re: [music-dsp] confirm a2ab2276c83b0f9c59752d823250447ab4b666

I get reports about this every couple weeks. Because it's a double opt-out no one is actually being unsubscribed from the list unless they want to be. So please ignore these bogus unsub messages. It's not worth spending time worrying about it. douglas On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Evan

Re: [music-dsp] Cheap spectral centroid recipe

Robert, On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 3:38 PM, robert bristow-johnson < r...@audioimagination.com> wrote: > geez, i wish i could cut and paste text without getting all of that HTML > crap in there. i dunno how this is going through majordomo or whatever > Douglas has running the list. That's a

Re: [music-dsp] confirm 2692e89dd013da35bd113d6f644fdcfa865054c3

We've had a couple of these in the last week. The list requires a confirmation email for unsub requests, so I don't think anyone has actually been removed. I'm not sure there's much to be done about this sort of thing. best, douglas On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:05 PM, robert bristow-johnson

Re: [music-dsp] [admin] list etiquette

and a deeply unfriendly atmosphere. PLEASE TRY HARDER. On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Bennett Dobni bdo...@gmail.com wrote: Wanker ___ dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list music-dsp@music.columbia.edu

Re: [music-dsp] unsubscribe

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:59 PM, b...@bobhuff.com wrote: To unsubscribe please see the list info page: https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp best, douglas ___ music-dsp mailing list music-dsp@music.columbia.edu

[music-dsp] [admin] list etiquette

Hi everyone, Douglas the list admin here. I've been away and haven't really been monitoring the list recently. It's been full of bad feelings, unpleasant interactions, and macho posturing. Really not much that I find interesting. I just want to reiterate a few things about the list. I'm loathe

Re: [music-dsp] Change in reply-to?

I've set it back to reply to list. best, douglas On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Phil Burk philb...@mobileer.com wrote: Oddly enough, replying to the sender is the default setting for Mailman. The music-dsp list recently moved to a new server, from music.columbia.edu to lists.columbia.edu.

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] list blurp

Hi everyone, Columbia is switching some servers around, so there may be a slight blip in the list sometime this week. Hopefully no big deal. The list address should stay the same, and the archives will be preserved. Everyone will be resubscribed to either normal or digest mode, although if you've

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

Re: [music-dsp] Calculating e^(i*phase) * (H + H')

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:07 PM, MF ukel...@gmail.com wrote: ps2. sorry I just by accident posted the same question without a subject an hour ago, is there a way to delete it from the archive? I can go in and edit the archive files. But I wouldn't worry about it! best, douglas -- dupswapdrop

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

Re: [music-dsp] job posting

Yes. On Oct 11, 2014 6:04 PM, Anthony Agnello aagne...@eventide.com wrote: Hi, We're looking for a DSP developer. Is it ok to email a description to music-dsp? Thanks, Tony Agnello -- dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website: subscription info, FAQ, source code archive,

[music-dsp] [admin] Re: #musicdsp expert warning

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Peter S peter.schoffhau...@gmail.com wrote: Uninteresting and inappropriate offtopic remark: Peter, the question of how the ear works is certainly relevant to music-dsp. Repeated use of profanity and criticism of other individuals and other message boards is

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [OT] Martin Hairer, Amadeus developer, wins Fields Medal!

http://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20140812-in-mathematical-noise-one-who-heard-music -- dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website: subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp links http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] Re: Simulating Valve Amps

Hi folks, This is generally a friendly, tolerant list. I feel like this conversation is getting a bit snippy, on all sides. Please consider letting it cool off for a bit to try and reset the tone. Let's give each other the benefit of the doubt and assume good intentions - - we're all here to

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

Re: [music-dsp] music-dsp mailing list digest settings

The digest doesn't go by number of messages, it goes by size. It was set at 10k to trigger a new digest, I just upped it to 10k. Let me know how that feels. best, douglas On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Kjetil Matheussen k.s.matheus...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Douglas and others, I wonder if it

Re: [music-dsp] music-dsp mailing list digest settings

That setting is a float, so who knows what == will return... (I meant 100k.) .d On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:08 PM, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com wrote: 10k 10k ? :-) On 3/27/14 10:51 AM, Douglas Repetto wrote: The digest doesn't go by number of messages, it goes

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

Re: [music-dsp] Hosting playback module for samples

PortAudio! http://www.portaudio.com best, douglas On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Mark Garvin mgar...@panix.com wrote: I realize that this is slightly off the beaten path for this group, but it's a problem that I've been trying to solve for a few years: I had written software for

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] Fwd: WACM

+ Summer 2014, University of California Santa Cruz Workshop Team: David Cope, Larry Polansky, Peter Elsea, Daniel Brown Workshop in Algorithmic Computer Music David Cope, author of Virtual Music and developer of Experiments in Musical Intelligence, will lead the Workshop team. *

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

Re: [music-dsp] Duplicate digests?

Hi Mike, What address have you been using to contact me? I haven't received anything from you. I'm sorry about the extra digests. No one else has mentioned it, which suggests it's a problem with your email provider or client. Resubscribing with a different address would be a good test. You could

Re: [music-dsp] DSP/Plug-in Developers in the Big Apple

Well, the music-dsp list lives in New York City! And all of the universities in the city have active computer music programs. Plus there are lots of freelance developers and several audio-oriented startups. I'd recommend checking out the various music hack days, hacker spaces, dorkbot,

Re: [music-dsp] DSP/Plug-in Developers in the Big Apple

There are all sorts of smaller venues that have strange/experimental music every night. Roulette and Issue Project Room, for example. best, douglas On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:20 PM, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com wrote: On 1/2/14 8:40 PM, Douglas Repetto wrote: Well

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

*** OBNOXIOUS WARNING THAT YOU CAN'T MISS: BEWARE: Messages containing HTML, rich text, or any type of attachment will be silently rejected from the list! This may change soon. But for now, BEWARE!!! *** Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the

Re: [music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Heh, I guess we don't need that WARNING anymore! On 11/15/13 7:00 AM, douglas repetto wrote: *** OBNOXIOUS WARNING THAT YOU CAN'T MISS: BEWARE: Messages containing HTML, rich text, or any type of attachment will be silently rejected from the list! This may change soon. But for now

[music-dsp] [admin] HTML test

This is an html email. If you're reading the list in a plaintext only client, please let me know if you can't read this message. (JOKE!) best, douglas -- ... http://artbots.org .douglas.irving http://dorkbot.org

[music-dsp] [admin] plain text test

I just sent a message to the list using HTML. If you use a plain text only client and could not read it, please let me know. best, douglas -- ... http://artbots.org .douglas.irving http://dorkbot.org

[music-dsp] [admin] another HTML test

Hi Dave, I have the list set to convert HTML mail to plain text. So it's a good sign that the email went through. I'm composing this in red text and changing fonts around. That should all disappear when this message arrives... Here's a list: 1. * taco 2. * truck Wheee! --

Re: [music-dsp] Your message to music-dsp awaits moderator approval

Okay, that's just because the message was too large. Note that the HTML is actually being stripped out, so crazy formatting will be removed. On 11/11/13 12:16 PM, STEFFAN DIEDRICHSEN wrote: I think, I stretched it … Steffan On 11.11.2013, at 18:15, music-dsp-boun...@music.columbia.edu

Re: [music-dsp] [admin] another HTML test

while I was out of town and found that it's impossible to send plain text email that way! best, douglas On 11/11/13 12:16 PM, douglas repetto wrote: Hi Dave, I have the list set to convert HTML mail to plain text. So it's a good sign that the email went through. I'm composing this in red

Re: [music-dsp] [admin] another HTML test

Oh, and I've turned on notification for bounced messages. Hopefully we won't clog up the server too much. In the past we've had thousands of robots hammering on the server 24/7. best, douglas On 11/11/13 12:16 PM, douglas repetto wrote: Hi Dave, I have the list set to convert HTML

Re: [music-dsp] [admin] another HTML test

Same with the stock Android mail client. On 11/11/13 12:20 PM, Dave Gamble wrote: Indeed, it appears to be +completely+ impossible to send non-multipart plaintext email from iOS using the Mail app there, or even the gmail app. Dave. On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:19 PM, douglas repetto doug

Re: [music-dsp] Fwd: [admin] another HTML test

: [music-dsp] [admin] another HTML test Date: 11. November 2013 18:20:14 MEZ To: A discussion list for music-related DSP music-dsp@music.columbia.edu Does this apply to rich text mails as well? That was the problem with Mail here. Steffan On 11.11.2013, at 18:19, douglas repetto doug

Re: [music-dsp] R: R: Trapezoidal integrated optimised SVF v2

Urs, I don't know if you're referring to music-dsp here, but this list is specifically not meant to be in the academic realm, but rather a place where people of all sorts with an interest in music and digital signal processing can chat. So I encourage you to share your results here! I'm

Re: [music-dsp] Analog versus digital systems

Theo, please stop with the insults. On 11/10/13 9:55 AM, Theo Verelst wrote: Of course I'm aware of it this work probably won't give m a (bit late) YUP existence in SanFrancisco or a well paid Berkeley professorship that I like, but at least I don't really run the risk of looking like a

Re: [music-dsp] Missing replies for the past year or possibly more

I've just added a new obnoxious warning to the reminder that goes out to the list 2x a month. We should obviously change this policy in some way, but I can't deal with it at the moment. I'll figure something out soon. Sorry for the missed messages and disrupted conversations. best, douglas

Re: [music-dsp] Test thanks to Douglas!

Ha, a reminder again that we still have a no attachments/html/richtext policy in place. At some point when my brain has more than 1 free cycle/day I'll look into revising that policy. best, douglas On 11/4/13 8:50 AM, STEFFAN DIEDRICHSEN wrote: Wow, it worked! Thanks to Douglas. On

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] Re: HTML

Hi list. I'm on the road, so a full response will have to wait awhile. A couple quick notes: * the HTML mail no bounce issue is specifically mentioned in the faq: http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp/musicdspFAQ.admin.html * there have been times when the list and server were being

Re: [music-dsp] note onset detection

Eric, it looks like you're sending HTML mail. The list only takes plain text. best, douglas On 8/7/13 3:01 PM, Eric Battenberg wrote: For the life of me, I can't get the list to stop ignoring my replies (I'm not even getting bounces), so just to be sure, I've CC'd everyone on the thread.

[music-dsp] [admin] Re: note onset detection

And FWIW, maybe it's time to change that. Spam filters have gotten a lot better in the last few years. This is an OLD list, and back in the day attachments/HTML caused lots of problems. What do you all think? Should we allow HTML/attachments? best, douglas On 8/7/13 3:34 PM, douglas

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

Re: [music-dsp] Starting From The Ground Up

And lots of semi-outdated DSP book reviews here: http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp/dspbooks.html On 1/21/13 10:28 AM, Russell McClellan wrote: From a more theoretical perspective, you can't go wrong with the free online books at https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/ These intro DSP books

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

Re: [music-dsp] Lerping Biquad coefficients to a flat response

This is cracking me up, keep going! We want more!!! Soon you'll have a one hour DSP comedy special! On 1/3/13 5:22 PM, Nigel Redmon wrote: sigh…hopefully my last post on this… Sorry, I looked at rbi's peak spec and it is symmetrical—I was thinking of his shelving filters, which need to be

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

Re: [music-dsp] need help with gnuplot and octave on my mac.

Robert, did you upgrade Mac OSX to 10.8? If so, it no longer supports PPC binaries via emulation, and it looks like you're using a PPC version of gnuplot... douglas On 10/26/12 2:51 PM, Andy Farnell wrote: Hi Robert, Not sure I can help because I am not a Mac user, but I do use Octave

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

Re: [music-dsp] ### Pointers for auto-classification of sounds?

On 6/11/12 2:26 PM, robert bristow-johnson wrote: i actually never really understood GAs except in the context of optimization when there are a zillion knobs to twist as an alternative to algorithms like Steepest Descent, with or without this annealing trick that jumbles up the variables (the

Re: [music-dsp] Pointers for auto-classification of sounds?

Phil, these are nice examples, but they really highlight the difficulty of using the evolution metaphor in a consistent way. What, exactly, is evolving? On 6/11/12 2:32 PM, Phil Burk wrote: On 6/11/12 10:36 AM, douglas repetto wrote: That's really why I mostly lost interest in that domain

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

[music-dsp] [admin] music-dsp FAQ

Hi, Just a reminder that if you are new to the list you should read the music-dsp FAQ. It contains answers to both technical _and_ adminstrative questions that often come up on the list. If your question appears in the FAQ it is safe to assume that it has been discussed on the list many times in

  1   2   >