; but the modern software patent is a cash cow not
only for companies (pity the poor individual inventor indeed!) but also
de facto for government exchequers everywhere, and is I suspect here to
stay.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ
time are probably vanishingly small. No chip, no card, no plugin,
no new effect. No composer will be able to make use of it unless they
are veeerrry patient and abandon all thoughts of MIDI control. Don't
even ~think~ of implementing it in PD. Still, watch this space etc...
Richard Dobson
are relatively random, so peaks are less likely to reinforce each other.
And at the very least, it would mean that if you do decide to add
limiting or compression, it can be very much milder, and ~just possibly~
might not be noticed!
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list
a bit of aliasing if
pushed? (I haven't got one, so I can't try it).
Yes. Didn't take a huge amount of pushing. I thought that was supposed
to be part of its charm.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list
emulation complete with patches (poss in the Csound book;
not to hand right now).
Have we now reached the point where FM sounds are back in fashion?
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
and go beyond
to real-time interactive this and that. Expressions of interest are invited!
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http
plus crosstalk cancellation (some
techniques such as ambiophonics claim to be able to create the sense of
full surround using just the two speakers), or at some other more or
less sophisticated psycho-acoustic illusion, which as per usual will
likely not work for everyone.
Richard Dobson
On 07
either side of a round iMac (so hardly a
definitive or rigorous test!) I actually got the effect quite clearly.
If that was not yours, whose might it have been?
Richard Dobson
On 07/02/2012 20:59, Ralph Glasgal wrote:
Ambiophonics (actually Panambiophonics) requires four speakers to reproduce
. Breaks just about every
dsp/ee rule in the book, but nobody cares if it creates a cool sound,
preferably one where everyone asks how on earth did they do ~that~?
and where can I buy one?. And, inevitably, is it patented?.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website
or Wiimotes, or whatever.
The current version is 5.16, released this month:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/csound/files/csound5/
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http
the other day on a news bulletin the reference to James
Dyson as someone who had invented a new hoover.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music
On 26/02/2012 14:11, Brad Garton wrote:
On Feb 26, 2012, at 5:13 AM, Richard Dobson wrote:
It is rather more flexible than Max/MSP, say, because you can if
you want to run a single-sample vector, whereas MSP has always been
fixed to a 64-sample block size.
I don't think that's actually true
to learn any maths, do we?.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
but who think and compose algorithmically. What do we
call them? For nobody really exists until we can call them something.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http
them -- much.
Quite. We don't have to think about them at all, except for the times
when we do!
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http
is how I describe myself, because all the activities I engage in
are related to music one way and another. It remains to be seen, of
course, to what extent my sonifications amount to music - but they
have at least been used by musicians to make music with, so that makes
it OK.
Richard Dobson
On 28/02/2012 13:05, Andy Farnell wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:04:45AM +, Richard Dobson wrote:
So, one way and another, Computer music is so laden with
definitions and qualifications as to have lost all definition -
using it gives the listener no real information.
And yet, if I
possible criterion of goodness of a piece for it to qualify as HAA
(assuming of course HAA can itself be adequately defined). I am really
interested in what other paradigms of the compositional process could
also qualify for a HAA piece.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list
that to be more fertile ground to
plant this in.
Possibly also the sursound list; lots of interest there in soundfields,
acoustics, modelling etc.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
it more myself. The link to the Dahl dissertation is
very helpful.
And with respect to stupid' algorithms - musicians by and large simply
don't mind that much, if the results are (by whatever criteria) either
useful or cool.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list
different thing entirely - 480+ cores,
whereas a high-end general-purpose machine may sport 8.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http
has been added.
For Windows and OS X (Universal Binary) as usual.
Get it from:
http://people.bath.ac.uk/masrwd/mctools.html
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http
and decoding, and also
some HRTF opcodes for binaural encoding.
Richard Dobson
** http://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http
On 10/10/2012 20:33, Richard Dobson wrote:
..
offline solutions, also some plugins*).
*e.g.:
http://www.kvraudio.com/product/b_binaural_ambisonic_binaural_decoder_by_digenis
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive
easily mask higher frequencies.
The phase-shifted version of the pulse wave can be expected to have an
effect on resultant tones, due to the more or less random local
cancellation effects that may arise.
Richard Dobson
On 06/12/2012 12:13, Didier Dambrin wrote:
not at all (plus I never really
wheere the partials are all self-reinforcing. The rms levels are about
the same. So it is a multi-dimensional comparison.
Richard Dobson
On 07/12/2012 04:47, Didier Dambrin wrote:
I'm no psychoacoustician, but I do know that the ear doesn't
completely disregard phase on the scale of a few
Sorry - long post! feel free to delete!
On 20/02/2013 03:50, mathieu barthet wrote:
Dear Richard Dobson,
Please see comments below.
..
Stravinsky: music is powerless to express anything at all.
-- Yes he said it, but:
In 1962, he [Stravinsky] clarified what he meant – a little
grumpily
for all those lists of
emotions to be reclassified according to the above schema.
And so on...
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
emotions/moods in listeners. A large number of studies offer
empirical evidence in support of this assumption. The survey will
only make sense to you if you also support this assumption.]
Works for me!
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ
be anyway.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
On 20/02/2013 16:12, Richard Dobson wrote:
.. So were I to do
the survey, I fear I might be guilty of some mischief.
So in fact, I need not have worried - mischief is built into the system!
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ
] they value music primarily
because of the emotions it evokes.
If something is taken as axiomatic, which should better be a hypothesis
to be tested, confusion is an unsurprising result.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code
On 22/02/2013 05:33, mathieu barthet wrote:
May I...
On 20/02/2013 16:12, Richard Dobson wrote: .. So were I to do
the survey, I fear I might be guilty of some mischief.
So in fact, I need not have worried - mischief is built into the
system!
Richard Dobson
@Richard: If I understand
the Csound oscillator famously fast. There are
reasons enough to have conditional tests inside a per-sample loop, but
where they can be avoided, significant speedups can be achieved.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code
?
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
+1!
On 07/11/2013 17:30, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
+1
On 7 Nov 2013, at 17:16, Phil Burk philb...@mobileer.com wrote:
Dear Theo,
I found Andrew's postings to be very interesting and helpful.
Respectful disagreement is welcome. Insults are not. Please stop.
Thank you,
Phil Burk
--
) they will tend to focus on the feeling, rather than on the
information. Its a bit like trying to drive with the brakes on.
Richard Dobson
On 08/11/2013 21:12, Theo Verelst wrote:
Richard Dobson wrote:
-1.
..
Don't you feel that if I'm simply right, and refuse to subscribe to the
sort of crime
of the journey, not the end of it! So, yes, I agree that
modesty from a PhD is always good to see!
Richard Dobson
On 13/11/2013 16:54, Theo Verelst wrote:
I must say that where I received my (at the time) top level education,
the PhD's had much higher standards concerning human modesty and
theoretical
a possible or actual analogue circuit.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
to something first; they probably have even more
subscription fatigue than I do. They would for example need to be able
to install it on a school network without requiring each student to
subscribe to what is presumably an un-moderated forum not expressly
designed for youngsters.
Richard
for general audio dsp design, and of course
has a huge and ever expanding repertoire of opcodes, etc.
Richard Dobson
On 03/01/2014 01:40, Douglas Repetto wrote:
Well, the music-dsp list lives in New York City! And all of the
universities in the city have active computer music programs. Plus
++) {
out[i*2] = buffer[i];
out[i*2+1] = buffer[i];
}
HTH,
Richard Dobson
On 24/01/2014 16:49, Pablo Frank wrote:
After initializing psf_out2, initializing psfinfo_out to zero, and correcting
the if, as displayed below at (1), the code displayed below in (2) still
generates an empty stereo
First time I have seen Linux listed as a language. Interesting!
Richard Dobson
On 24/01/2014 17:48, Theo Verelst wrote:
Aren't there examples with the software the source is a part of? I hate
to be annoying, but in like Linux and C, long standing pro-languages,
...
--
dupswapdrop -- the music
On 25/01/2014 10:33, Richard Dobson wrote:
..
Also - that is a whole lot of computing stuff to, um, install, to try
out a sound with some detuned sinusoids. How about posting an example in
Csound? :-)
I decided to write it myself, in the end, so here it is, with I hope
sufficient comments
On 25/01/2014 14:22, Theo Verelst wrote:
Richard Dobson wrote:
On 25/01/2014 10:33, Richard Dobson wrote:
...
I decided to write it myself, in the end, so here it is, with I hope
sufficient comments in the code to disambiguate the subtle difference
between detuning a square-wave oscillator
(with suitably ultra-high sr) waveform from an analog synth doing hard
sync? What does the real thing actually look like?
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu
of measurement with
another, but is relatively uninformative in the absence of being able to
hear the before and after and make what inevitably will be an aesthetic
value judgement.
Richard Dobson
On 27/02/2014 10:05, Theo Verelst wrote:
The big graphs of signal processing are for things like mid
the subject line; but then it
wouldn't be the first time that has happened, either!
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http
makes the message 1001011001101 and not, say,
00100101100110100? There are two pairs of zeroes inside the message,
so it is at least plausible that it could begin and end with pairs of
zeroes. What role does ambiguity (and the avoidance thereof) play in
these entropy questions?
Richard Dobson
all
six, give a suitably quiet listening environment and an appropriately
generous overall playback level etc.
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu
not exceed the extent of the buffer at
either end. A slow modulation rate will then apply a respectable
vibrato, with pitch deviation approx equal above and below the source.
At least, that is how I have always done it...
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website
, of course!
Richard Dobson
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
only need to compute FFTs at those intervals (e.g.
triggered by a timer and reconciled with your main audio buffer), not
at the higher analysis frame rates associated with FFT overlapping.
Richard Dobson
On 11/06/2015 16:18, Phil Burk wrote:
Hello Connor,
If you just wanted to do a quick FFT
Ditto!
Richard Dobson
On 22/08/2015 16:50, Michael Gogins wrote:
Thank you, Douglas.
Regards,
Mike
___
music-dsp mailing list
music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
I think this might be a bit too restrictive; there have been many highly
informative exchanges here over the years, all well-considered, that
have exceeded this limit. The key is surely well-considered - and the
absence of egoic chest-beating!
Richard Dobson
On 22/08/2015 16:21, Douglas
ime-domain FIR, all to achieve the lowest possible latency.
But that was all a while ago now, has that patent not now expired? There
is a perfectly usable fixed-size partitioned convolution opcode in
Csound, among other things.
Richard Dobson
On 31/08/2015 03:15, Tom Duffy wrote:
...
Do
forget now, but I
think it was turned down for being "over-ambitious". Maybe they were
right, and it is just too much to take on unless you are a large company
with a big R budget. I would have liked to chance to try though!
Richard Dobson
On 22/12/2015 00:51, Michael Gogins wrote
This might not be possible if one is implementing e.g. a plugin to run
in a third-party host - where one does not have full control over the
host, nor indeed of fellow plugins. Whereas adding some ~very~ low level
TPDF dither to a signal should be close to minimum cost.
Richard Dobson
On 10
It is a most fascinating thread. The more one looks into it, the more
one has to marvel that the process works at all.
Richard Dobson
On 07/09/2017 07:16, Nigel Redmon wrote:
Somehow, combining the term "rat's ass" with a clear and concise
explanation of your viewpoint makes it
.
Richard Dobson
On 30/09/2017 17:03, Renato Fabbri wrote:
I am not finding this information clearly.
BTW. microphones capture amplitude or displacement
or it depends?
--
Renato Fabbri
GNU/Linux User #479299
labmacambira.sourceforge.net <http://labmacambira.sourceforge.
It might also be worth looking at Sonic Visualiser, which is open source:
https://www.sonicvisualiser.org/
Richard Dobson
On 10/07/2018 14:01, Patric Schmitz wrote:
Hi Raphaël,
you might consider additional spectral descriptors such as MFCC/BFCC,
cepstrum, spectral moments like centroid
, and
others from various Csound and similar conferences. If people are
interested, I can can probably find more details.
Richard Dobson
___
dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list
music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo
estimated
(back-of-an-envelope-style) demands of the order of 50GFlops. Of course
there remain many unanswered questions!
Richard Dobson
On 19/03/2020 16:18, Ethan Duni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 1:05 PM Richard Dobson <mailto:rich...@rwdobson.com>> wrote:
Our ICMC pape
sorry for the repeats - don't know how that happened!
___
dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list
music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
(but some transformations are pretty
cpu-intensive too!). The Bath Uni team said they were using a
"mid-range" graphic card (on a Linux workstation).
Richard Dobson
On 19/03/2020 17:45, Eric Brombaugh wrote:
Wow - interesting discussion.
I've implemented a real-time SDFT on an FPGA for use in
On 10/03/2020 19:45, Ethan Duni wrote:
On Mar 10, 2020, at 3:38 AM, Richard Dobson wrote:
You can have windows when hop size is 1 sample (as used in the sliding phase
vocoder (SPV) proposed by Andy Moorer exactly 20 years ago, and the focus of a
research project I was part of around 2007
66 matches
Mail list logo
