Hello Rolf,
On 27/06/2018 11:31 PM, rolfsassin...@web.de wrote:
Now, I like to have an EQ with most probable flat response which is
adjustable in steepness and frequency.
[snip]
Is there an analytic function decribing this?
Check this one out:
Thomas Hélie, "Simulation of Fractional-Order
mited filters though?
> Regards Rolf
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2018 um 16:49 Uhr
> *Von:* "robert bristow-johnson"
> *An:* music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
> *Betreff:* Re: [music-dsp] EQ-building with fine adjustable steepness
> So with a one-pole LPF with its c
Original Message
Subject: Re: [music-dsp] EQ-building with fine adjustable steepness
From: rolfsassin...@web.de
Date: Fri, June 29, 2018 12:06 pm
To: music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
ow-johnson"
An: music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
Betreff: Re: [music-dsp] EQ-building with fine adjustable steepness
So with a one-pole LPF with its corner frequency set very low, you wI'll get a -6 sB slope, which is twice the slope that you desire for pink noise.if you follow that with a
ination is more important than knowledge."
Original message
From: rolfsassin...@web.de
Date: 6/27/2018 6:31 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
Subject: [music-dsp] EQ-building with fine adjustable steepness
Dear all, I registered new to the list for p
Dear all, I registered new to the list for private interest (building self programmable music gear as hobby). Since there was activity yet, I would like to ask my question regarding equalizer builing:
We know, classical EQs will work that way, that they decrease e.g 6dB/12dB/24dB per octave st