Okay, a few more thoughts:
On 23/07/2015, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com wrote:
okay, since there is no processing, just passing the signal from A/D to
D/A converter, there is only one quantization operation, at the A/D.
That's only true *if* it's a non-dithered converter
On 7/25/15 10:57 AM, Tom Duffy wrote:
You didn't change the bandwidth.
If the target signal is max 30Hz and you have a 192kHz sampler, you
low pass
at 2x your max frequency (60Hz, but lets say 100Hz for convenience) using
a brick wall digital filter (processed at 192kHz). Then you do a
You didn't change the bandwidth.
If the target signal is max 30Hz and you have a 192kHz sampler, you low pass
at 2x your max frequency (60Hz, but lets say 100Hz for convenience) using
a brick wall digital filter (processed at 192kHz). Then you do a
downsampling
of the signal from 192kHz to
Hi Andy,
Also, the purpose of a reflection-free port in wave digital filters
(WDF) was to eliminate delay-free loops. That probably goes back
earlier than 1975 since WDFs started in 1969.
- Julius
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Andrew Leary a...@korgrd.com wrote:
On Jul 25, 2015, at 12:25
Unless you consider the papers by Mitra et alias, but dealing only with linear
graphs computability…which are dated effectively in the 70s.
M.
Da: music-dsp [mailto:music-dsp-boun...@music.columbia.edu] Per conto di Marco
Lo Monaco
Inviato: sabato 25 luglio 2015 01:31
A:
On 25/07/2015, Peter S peter.schoffhau...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/07/2015, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com wrote:
depends on what we have available for sample rates. essentially we are
only limited by the laws in Information Theory. if i have a 192 kHz
system and i only need
