Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-05-16 Thread Wen Xue
: Monday, May 14, 2012 10:36 AM To: music-dsp@music.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis Hi, everyone, apologies for the delay...was on a short vacation ;) On 25 April 2012 02:22, Wen Xue mr.x@gmail.com wrote: Yes, it's very right that you can't recover a and b from a+b

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-05-16 Thread Charles Henry
. w.x. -Original Message- From: Domagoj Saric Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 10:36 AM To: music-dsp@music.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis Hi, everyone, apologies for the delay...was on a short vacation ;) On 25 April 2012 02:22, Wen Xue mr.x@gmail.com

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-05-14 Thread Richard Dobson
On 14/05/2012 10:45, Domagoj Saric wrote: .. If you don't mind an honest suggestion: having looked at the Csound source and mostly seeing the decades old C-style coding it would IMO probably be better if you try and skip reinventing as many wheels (e.g. CUDA, vectorization...) as possible with

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-24 Thread Earl Vickers
Thanks for the info about the presum code in pvoc.c. I tried this technique in Matlab, but I must be doing something wrong with the sinc windows - I got all the expected doubling and echoing. Any additional hints on making this work, without reverse-engineering the C code? It's too bad there's

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-24 Thread Charles Henry
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Domagoj Šarić dsar...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 April 2012 17:15, Charles Henry czhe...@gmail.com wrote: Don't let it bother you too much.  I can tell by looking at it--This is a stupid algorithm. I sort of regret those words--it just seems so basic in terms of

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-23 Thread Domagoj Šarić
On 20 April 2012 17:15, Charles Henry czhe...@gmail.com wrote: Don't let it bother you too much.  I can tell by looking at it--This is a stupid algorithm. It does seem strange and counterintuitive at first glance but it's hard to just simply dismiss it thus once you've seen it examined in

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-23 Thread Wen Xue
: Saturday, April 21, 2012 12:30 AM To: music-dsp@music.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis Alessandro Saccoia alessandro.sacc...@gmail.com wrote: http://web.archive.org/web/20060513150136/http://archive.chipcenter.com/dsp/DSP000315F1.html The images haven't been archived

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-23 Thread Domagoj Šarić
On 20 April 2012 19:30, Theo Verelst theo...@tiscali.nl wrote: Hi The theoretical background probably most appropriate for the FFT... snip Also, averaging the output of the IFFT is indeed some sort of a FIR low frequency filter which cannot exactly do what you'd normally want (a great smooth

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-23 Thread Domagoj Šarić
On 20 April 2012 23:50, Chris Cannam chris.can...@eecs.qmul.ac.uk wrote: Mark Dolson's CARL phase vocoder (http://www.crca.ucsd.edu/cmusic/cmusic.html) from 1984 uses window presum if the FFT is shorter than the window, and includes resynthesis. I suppose the idea is to reduce some of the

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-23 Thread Domagoj Šarić
On 21 April 2012 01:30, s...@sfxmachine.com wrote: This method is also discussed in Crochiere Rabiner's Multirate Digital Signal Processing book, but it didn't make sense to me there either - I'm assuming this is my problem, not theirs. Apparently this method windows the input with a window

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-23 Thread Domagoj Šarić
On 23 April 2012 12:20, Domagoj Šarić dsar...@gmail.com wrote: More importantly, yes, the code does have resynthesis and the way it avoids the flanging (or echo for larger frame sizes) artefacts (that you get from adding the frame-size-delayed copy of the signal to itself) is by applying a

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-23 Thread Richard Dobson
On 23/04/2012 11:28, Domagoj Šarić wrote: ... So Crochiere's book discusses synthesis? Unfortunately I don't have it... In any case, simple periodic extension and windowing didn't work for me (it produces echo/flanging as one might expect)... I'm afraid to try this, because it doesn't make

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-23 Thread Wen Xue
be observed, a similar illusion. -Original Message- From: Domagoj Šarić Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 11:40 AM To: A discussion list for music-related DSP Subject: Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis On 23 April 2012 10:52, Wen Xue mr.x@gmail.com wrote: Time-aliasing is just another

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-23 Thread Dave Hoskins
On 23/04/2012 11:49, Domagoj Šarić wrote: On 23 April 2012 12:20, Domagoj Šarićdsar...@gmail.com wrote: More importantly, yes, the code does have resynthesis and the way it avoids the flanging (or echo for larger frame sizes) artefacts (that you get from adding the frame-size-delayed copy of

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-23 Thread Theo Verelst
And for people with a lot of time on their hands, we added the Sliding DFT version (analysis frame updated every sample) a few years ago - including a simple instance of frequency domain convolution for the windowing. A real-time version of this was presented at ICMC last year, running on a GPU.

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-20 Thread Alessandro Saccoia
Hello, I haven't read your post in detail but ps. I've seen this article http://archive.chipcenter.com/dsp/DSP000315F1.html often being mentioned as explaining it all but unfortunately the site no longer exists… always check archive.org for pages that are gone...

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-20 Thread Charles Henry
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Domagoj Šarić dsar...@gmail.com wrote: ...but unfortunately all of these however seem to stop at the analysis stage (i.e. we've gotten a more precise spectrum and that's all we need). I've wraped my head around the idea itself and the analysis procedure, I

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-20 Thread Chris Cannam
On 20 April 2012 14:15, Domagoj Šarić dsar...@gmail.com wrote: ...but unfortunately all of these however seem to stop at the analysis stage (i.e. we've gotten a more precise spectrum and that's all we need). Mark Dolson's CARL phase vocoder (http://www.crca.ucsd.edu/cmusic/cmusic.html) from

Re: [music-dsp] Window presum synthesis

2012-04-20 Thread sfx
Alessandro Saccoia alessandro.sacc...@gmail.com wrote: http://web.archive.org/web/20060513150136/http://archive.chipcenter.com/dsp/DSP000315F1.html The images haven't been archived, but you could still find it a useful reference. This link includes the images: