On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 22:53, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl wrote:
Hello,
On 22/05/11 15:53, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
Before NGS I added some releases where both English and Chinese titles
appear on the cover. I created one release for each language.
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 20:45, Nikki aei...@gmail.com wrote:
Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
That sounds pretty good, but it wouldn't really be accurate for
karaoke tracks where the background singers are usually left in and
only the lead singer is left out. Perhaps a karaoke attribute would
work,
Hello,
On 24/05/11 09:28, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
Going forward, I think that it would be nice if perhaps recordings
could have aliases by language. Perhaps there should be some attribute
for official translations, if there is such a thing. With such a
scheme, we could get rid of lots of
Thanks. I voted for it, although I don't know if the votes are taken into
account.
2011/5/23 Nikki aei...@gmail.com
By the way, there's a ticket here
http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-684
Nikki
Brant Gibbard wrote:
Sorry, I mis-spoke. I was testing with the annotation, and I had
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:52, Dr Andrew John Hughes
gnu_and...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On 23 May 2011 07:21, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/22 Dr Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org
I really don't see why we want to retain all covers verbatim; I
thought
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:48, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl wrote:
Hello,
On 24/05/11 09:28, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
Going forward, I think that it would be nice if perhaps recordings
could have aliases by language. Perhaps there should be some attribute
for official translations, if there is
On 24/05/11 10:37, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:48, Kuno Woudtk...@frob.nl wrote:
Hello,
On 24/05/11 09:28, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
Going forward, I think that it would be nice if perhaps recordings
could have aliases by language. Perhaps there should be some
2011/5/24 Dr Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org
On 23 May 2011 07:21, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/22 Dr Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org
I really don't see why we want to retain all covers verbatim; I
thought MusicBrainz was a database, not
Hello
I just noticed that the link name for the AR to relate a (soundtrack)
release group to its movie's URL at IMDb has been somehow merged with
the AR to indicate a recording uses samples from a movie (by linking
to its IMDb URL). Was this intentional / discussed at a previous time?
Because
For a few reasons, I've been silent here for the past while. However, I
feel I have to at least comment on the change in guidelines that has taken
place. I may not be commenting on the list, but I do still at least skim
the style list to see what's happening. Thus, when I saw an edit note
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 14:34, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
For a few reasons, I've been silent here for the past while. However, I
feel I have to at least comment on the change in guidelines that has taken
place. I may not be commenting on the list, but I do still
http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14491791
azertus is asking if we should have a way to record the fact that a
disc is considered bonus. It does seem that this ability was lost in
the move to NGS, but I'm not sure I think it's important. Thoughts?
--
Philip Jägenstedt
I support the complete overhaul and that the normal process has been
circumvented. Most of the old guidelines don't make sense with NGS, and
doing such a big change by RFC/RFV would have been extremely painful. I
think we're much better off taking the rewrite and working from there.
I couldn't
2011/5/18 Lukáš Lalinský lalin...@gmail.com:
The original NGS documentation which was written by me [1] says that
works with different remixes should be merged together. The Work page
[2] however says that they should be kep separate. All people I've
discussed this with agree that they should
On 24 May 2011 13:34, Brian Schweitzer brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
For a few reasons, I've been silent here for the past while. However, I
feel I have to at least comment on the change in guidelines that has taken
place. I may not be commenting on the list, but I do still at least
I have tried to find some examples to work out what is wrong and what is right.
It seems that only the current release-group-URL IMDb AR is wrong.
See a summary at
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Azertus/Potential_IMDb_Relationship_Type_Problem
Of course, this might be just a bug?
azertus
On
2011/5/24 Philip Jägenstedt phi...@foolip.org
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 14:34, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
For a few reasons, I've been silent here for the past while. However, I
feel I have to at least comment on the change in guidelines that has
taken
place.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phi...@foolip.org wrote:
http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14491791
azertus is asking if we should have a way to record the fact that a
disc is considered bonus. It does seem that this ability was lost in
the move to NGS, but I'm not sure I think
Well, we could simply add it to the name of the bonus medium in the release?
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com ha scritto:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phi...@foolip.org wrote:
http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14491791 azertus is asking if we should have a
way
On 24 May 2011 15:38, Philip Jägenstedt phi...@foolip.org wrote:
snip..
I'll let nikki and kuno speak for themselves, but just wanted to note
that I support the complete overhaul and that the normal process has
been circumvented. Most of the old guidelines don't make sense with
NGS, and
2011/5/24 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phi...@foolip.org wrote:
http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14491791
azertus is asking if we should have a way to record the fact that a
disc is considered bonus. It does seem that this
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes
gnu_and...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Sorry, but a process taking time or being painful is not a reason to impose
the views of a few people on everyone else.
I don't think that the intent of the NGS guideline updates was to
impose someone's view
and IMHO it would have been impossible to get the guidelines right in
advance
I think it would have been possible, but we would still be waiting for
NGS two or three years down the line.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
On 24/05/2011 16:59, Philipp Wolfer wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes
gnu_andrew-igugqlvvqircv4ilt04...@public.gmane.org wrote:
Sorry, but a process taking time or being painful is not a reason to impose
the views of a few people on everyone else.
I don't think
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:13 PM, monxton musicbra...@jordan-maynard.org wrote:
On 24/05/2011 16:59, Philipp Wolfer wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes
gnu_andrew-igugqlvvqircv4ilt04...@public.gmane.org wrote:
Sorry, but a process taking time or being painful is not a
On 05/24/2011 08:02 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2011/5/18 Lukáš Lalinskýlalin...@gmail.com:
The original NGS documentation which was written by me [1] says that
works with different remixes should be merged together. The Work page
[2] however says that they should be kep separate. All
On May 24, 2011, at 8:04 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I couldn't agree more and I've raised this issue in at least one
discussion. I didn't expect NGS to be an excuse to change the
guidelines by dictate rather than discussion.
I'd like to remind folks that Nikki and Warp are your BDFLs
Hello,
So how did such a major and complete rewrite skip RFC/RFV, and become
official within 6 days of being announced (if you count nikki's May 10 email
as being the RFC, though not mentioned in the email's subject).
I think this misrepresents what nikki and I have done.
No major changes
I was surprised when I saw this was not on the list. We have lots of
those (see http://musicbrainz.org/tag/format-cd-r for a sample) and I
would say it is distinctive enough to have it as an option under CD
(or, if not, to have another way of indicating it).
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
On 24/05/11 19:50, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
I was surprised when I saw this was not on the list. We have lots of
those (see http://musicbrainz.org/tag/format-cd-r for a sample) and I
would say it is distinctive enough to have it as an option under CD
(or, if not, to have another way of
2011/5/22, caller#6 meatbyproduct-musicbra...@yahoo.com:
On 05/21/2011 03:34 PM, symphonick wrote:
First version of my research page for CSG release names artists.
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick/Unofficial_CSG_release_names
2. It seems to me (and I guess you agree) that
On 05/24/2011 02:29 PM, symphonick wrote:
2011/5/22, caller#6meatbyproduct-musicbra...@yahoo.com:
4. Where the liner gives the key in French / English / German, I'd use
French as the default, simply because it's a French label. Could that
logic be applied to the Release Group title? That
32 matches
Mail list logo
